바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

A Study of mechanical properties of oxide layer removed Co-Cr-Mo abutments

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the oxide layer removal process in the Co-Cr-Mo (CCM) abutment after casting procedure on the prosthesis settlement and screw stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CCM abutments of four different interface conditions (CCM-M; machined, CCM-O; oxide layer formed, CCM-B; blasted, CCM-P; polished after blasted) and gold abutment (Gold-C; Cast with type III Gold alloy) were used. The initial settling values of abutments were evaluated according to the difference of implant-abutment length when the tightening torques were applied at 5 Ncm and 30 Ncm, and the settling values of abutments caused by loading were evaluated according to the difference of implantabutment length before and after loading with 250 N, 100000 cycle. The loss ratios of removal torque for abutment screws were evaluated according to the difference in value of removal torques under 30 Ncm tightening torque applied before and after cyclic loading. RESULTS: The CCM-P and CCM-B group showed a higher initial settling value compared with the Gold-C group (P<.05), while the Gold-C group showed the highest settling values caused by loading (P<.05) and no significant differences were observed for between CCM groups (P>.05). The loss ratio of removal torque values for the CCM-B, CCM-P groups did not differ significantly from that of the Gold-C group (P>.05). CONCLUSION: Even though the oxide layer was removed by different methods, CCM abutment with internal conical connection structure showed lower abutment settling and similar screw loosening after cyclic loading compared with gold abutment.

keywords
UCLA abutment, Gold abutment, CCM abutment, Oxide layer, Settling: Screw loosening

참고문헌

1.

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Br?nemark P, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:347-59.

2.

2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Br?nemark P. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387-416.

3.

3. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jmet T, Harris D, Krogh PHJ, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Hewwmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 5-year multicenter styudy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:450-55.

4.

4. Lekholm U, Grondahl K, Jmet T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 8:178-86.

5.

5. Jömeus L, Jmet T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:353-59.

6.

6. Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:834-39.

7.

7. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cementretained versus screw-retained implant restorations:A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:719-28.

8.

8. Lewis S, Beumer J, Moy P. The "UCLA" abutment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3:183-89.

9.

9. Barbosa G, Simamoto Junior P, Fernandes neto A, Mattos M, Neves F. Prosthetic laboratory influence on the vertical misfit at the implant/UCLA abutment interface. Braz Dent J 2007; 18(2): 139-43.

10.

10. Binon P, Mchuge M. The effect of elinimating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9:511-19.

11.

11. Duncan A, Labeed H, Abel L, Kamali A, Watts F. Effects of thermal treatments on protein adsorption of Co-Cr-Mo ASTM- F75 alloys. J Master Sci;Master Med 2011; 22:1455-464.

12.

12. Caicedo S, Desai R, McAllister K, Reddy A, Jacobs J, Hallab J. Soluble and particulate Co-Cr-Mo alloy implant metals activate the inflammasome danger signaling pathway in human macrophages: A novel mechanism for implant debris reactivity. J Orthop Res 2009; 27:847-54.

13.

13. Proussaefs P, Lozada J. Evaluation of two Vitallium blade- form implants retrieved after 13 to 21 years of function: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:412-17.

14.

14. Teigen K, Jokstad A. Dental implant suprastructures using cobalt-chromium alloy compared with gold alloy framework veneered with ceramic or acrylic resin : a retrospective cohort study up to 18years. Clin Oral Implant Res 2012; 23:853-60.

15.

15. Kenneth J. Philllips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. Charm yun. Co., 2003, korean Ver., p. 336-7, p. 575-6.

16.

16. Stüker RA, Teixeira ER, Beck JC, da Costa NP. Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screw for single standing implant restoration. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16(1):55-8.

17.

17. Shin HM, Jung CM, Jeon YC, Yun MJ, Yoon JH. Influence of tightening torque on implant-abutment screw joint stability. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008; 46:396-408.

logo