open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
For successful surgery-first approach, accurate prediction of skeletal and dental changes following orthognathic surgery is essential. With recent development of digital technology using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, attempts to provide more predictable orthodontic/orthognathic treatment have been made through 3D virtual surgery and digital tooth setup. A clinical protocol for the surgery-first orthognathic approach using virtual surgery is proposed. A case of skeletal Class III patient with facial asymmetry treated by the surgery-first approach using digital setup and virtual surgery is presented. Advantages and limitations of applying CAD/CAM technology to orthognathic surgery are discussed.
Zingler, Sebastian et al. “Surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: Psychological and biological aspects – A prospective cohort study “Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2017 , Volume 45 , Issue 8 , 1293 – 130.
Maria A. Peiro-Guijarro, Raquel Guijarro-Martinez, Federico Hernandez-Alfaro, Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of the literature, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Volume 149, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 448-462.
Im J, Kang SH, Lee JY, Kim MK, Kim JH. Surgeryfirst approach using a three-dimensional virtual setup and surgical simulation for skeletal Class III correction. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2014;44(6):330-341. doi:10.4041/kjod.2014.44.6.330.
Dan Grauer and William R. Proffit Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:433-43.
Heon Jae Cho (2007) Long-Term Stability of Surgical Mandibular Setback: e Angle Orthodontist:September 2007, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 851-856.
Yang HJ and Hwang SJ ; Contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment as a relapse factor after mandibular setback with saittal split ramus osteotomy: J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2014 Jun;42(4):e57-63.
Arnett G. A redefinition of bilateral sagittal osteotomy(BSO) advancement relapse ;AJODO1993;104(5):506-15.
Shin SH, Kim SS, Sandor GK, Kim YD, Roh et al;Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy: J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2014 Dec;42(8):1958-63.
Kim BH ; Minimum presurgical orthodontic treatment: The influence of the postsurgial occlusal stability on postsurgical mandibular changes in class III malocclusion: The Journal of Korean Dental Association 50(2), 2012.2, 64-71.
Kobayashi T, Watanabe I, Ueda K, Nakajima T. “Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism.”J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986 Sep;44(9):693-7.
Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C. “The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension.”Head Face Med 2007 Apr 30;3:21.
Giampietro F et al. “Three-Dimensional Virtual Treatment Planning: Presurgical Evalusation Journal of Craniofacial surgery 2018.
Matthew W.Brown, LorneKoroluk, Ching-ChangKo, KaiZhangd, MengqiChen, TungNguyen,:Effectiveness and efficiency of CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system ; Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:1067-74.
Timothy J. Alford,W. Eugene Roberts, James K. Hartsfield Jr, George J. Eckert, Ronald J. Snyder :Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the Suresmile method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy ; Angle Orhod . 2011;81-383-388.
Alexander Pauls, Manuel Nienkempe, Rainer Schwestka-PollyDirk Wiechmann : Therapeutic accuracy of the completetly customized lingual appliance, Journal of Orofacial orthopedics ;2017;78;1:52-61.