바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

CBCT에서 관찰되는trifid mandibular canal

Trifid mandibular canal in Cone-Beam CT : A case report

Abstract

Trifid mandibular canal (TMC) is one of the anatomical variation of mandibular canal with clinical importance. An extra mandibular canal may explain inadequate anesthesis and be damaged causing paresthesia or bleeding during mandibular surgery. CBCT with high-level spatial resolution is an useful tool for the detection of mandibular canal and its variation. The aim of this report is to present a case of trifid mandibular canal with CBCT images and to give information on this anatomical variation of mandibular canal.

keywords
Mandibular Nerve, Anatomical Variation, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

참고문헌

1.

Han SS, Hwang YS. Cone beam CT findings of retromolar canals in a Korean population. Surg Radiol Anat 2014;36:871-876.

2.

Gamieldien MY, Van Schoor A. Retroolar foramen: an anatomical study with clinical considerations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:784-787

3.

Truong MK, He P, Adeeb N, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS, Iwanaga J. Clinical anatomy and significance of the retromolar foramina and their canals: a literature review. Cureus 9(10):e1781.

4.

Ossenberg NS. Temporal crest canal: case report and statistics on a rare mandibular variant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:10-12.

5.

Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, Choi HY, Lee SR, Oh SH, Choi YJ, Kim GT, Choi YS, H EH. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:53-60.

6.

Rashsuren O, Choi JW, Han WJ, Kim EK. Assessment of bifid and trifid mandibular canals using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:229-236.

7.

Mizbah K, Gerlach N, Maal TJ, Berge SJ, Meijer GJ. The clinical relevance of bifid and trifid mandibular canals. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;16:147-151.

8.

Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh M, Ariji Y, Izumi M, Kurita K, Ariji E. Implant Dent 2007;16(1):24-27.

9.

Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with conebeam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011;33:501-507.

10.

Allison JR, Carr A. A prevalence study of bifid mandibular canals using cone beam computed tomography. Oral surg 2017;10(1):1-7.

11.

Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, Yilmaz S. Trifid mandibular nerve canal. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2013;1(2):67-69.

12.

Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, Tantanapornkul W, Katakami K, Kurabayashi T. Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:235-239.

13.

Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. JADA 1985;110:923-926.

14.

Castro MAA, Lagravere-Vich MO, Amaral TMP, Abreu MHG, Mesquita RA. Classifications of mandibular canal branching: a review of literature. World J Radiol 2015;7(12):531-537.

15.

Ogawa A, Fukuta Y, Nakasato H, Nakasato S. Evaluation by dental cone-beam computed tomography of the incidence and sites of branches of the inferior dental canal that supply mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:1116-1120.

16.

Arx T, Hanni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein M. Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod 2011;37(12):1608-1612.

17.

Patil S, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Araki K, Okano T. Retromolar canals as observed on cone-beam computed tomography: their incidence, course, and characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med ORal Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115(5):692-699.

logo