open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the Cone-beam computed tomograghy(CBCT) scan of endodontically treated maxillary first molars and investigate how second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal is treated, how the prognosis of mesiobuccal (MB) root is different compared to other roots and the prognosis factor on apical periodontitis. Methods: Subjects were endodontically treated maxillary first molars whose were collected from CBCT scans taken from January 2018 until December 2019. A total of 525 maxillary first molars were analyzed by an endodontist to determine the presence of the MB2 canal, the quality of the root canal filling, and the presence of apical periodontitis. The chi square test and Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the relationship between each variable. Results: MB2 canals were found in 46.3%, of which 76.5% were not treated. The more main canal of mesiobuccal root (MB1 canal) was well filled, the more significantly MB2 canal was well filled (p<0.001). The apical periodontitis of MB root was not related to the filling quality of MB1 canal (p=0.370) and was related to the filling quality of MB2 canal (p=0.004). The apical periodontitis of MB root was related to the quality of canal filling of MB2 canal and the apical periodontitis of DB and P root. Conclusions: It was found that the majority of MB2 canals were not treated. The apical periodontitis of MB root was analyzed to be related to the quality of canal filling of MB2 canal. The apical lesion of the MB root was not correlated with the treatment of the MB1 canal, but it was significantly related to the quality of filling of MB2 canal.
1. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod 2006;32:813–21.
2. al Shalabi RM, Omer OE, Glennon J, et al. Root canal anatomy of maxillary first and second permanent molars. Int Endod J. 2000;33:405-14.
3. Eriksen HM, Kirkevang LL, Petersson K. Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome: general considerations. Endod Topics 2002;19:1–9.
4. Kirkevang LL, Horsted-Bindslev P. Technical aspects of treatment in relation to treatment outcome. Endod Topics 2002;2:89–102.
5. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;30:297–306.
6. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995;28:12–8.
7. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spangberg LS. A prognostic model for assessment of the outcome of endodontic treatment: effect of biologic and diagnostic variables. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:342–52.
8. Nikoloudaki GE, Kontogiannis TG, Kerezoudis NP. Evaluation of the Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Permanent Molars and the Incidence of the Second Mesiobuccal Root Canal in Greek Popu-lation Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Open Dent J 2015;9:267–72.
9. Estrela C, Rabelo LE, de Souza JB, et al. Frequency of Root Canal Isthmi in Human Permanent Teeth Determined by Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod 2015;41:1535–9.
10. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, et al. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008;34:273–9.
11. Karabucak B, Bunes A, Chehoud C, et al. Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis in Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars with Untreated Canal: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study. J Endod. 2016;42:538-41
12. Martins JNR, Marques D, Silva EJNL, et al. Second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars-A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies using cone beam computed tomography. Arch Oral Biol 2020;113:104589.
13. Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999;25:446–50.
14. Hartwell G, Appelstein CM, Lyons WW, et al. The incidence of four canals in maxillary first molars: a clinical determination. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1344–6.
15. Coelho MS, Parker JM, Tawil PZ. Second mesiobuccal canal treatment in a predoctoral dental clinic: A retrospective clinical study. J Dent Educ. 2016;80:726–30.
16. Guo J, Vahidnia A, Sedghizadeh P, et al. Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2014;40:635–9.
17. Jing YN, Ye X, Liu DG, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography was used for study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2014;46:958–62.
18. Naseri M, Safi Y, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, et al. Survey of anatomy and root canal morphology of maxillary first molars regarding age and gender in an Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography. Iran Endod J 2016;11:298–303.
19. Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AJ, et al. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study. J Endod 2014;40:173–6.
20. Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod 2012;38:1063–8.
21. Martins JNR, Alkhawas MAM, Altaki Z, et al. Worldwide analyses of maxillary first molar second mesiobuccal prevalence: A multicenter cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 2018;44:1641-9.
22. Bauman R, Scarfe W, Clark S, et al. Ex vivo detection of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions. Int Endod J 2011;44:752–8.
23. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, et al. Efficacy of cone beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars:a pilot study. J Endod 2010;36:867–70.
24. Vizzotto MB, Silveira PF, Arus NA, et al. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling. Int Endod J 2013;46:870–6.
25. Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, et al. A 5 yr clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars. J Endod 2005;31:262–4.
26. Costa FFNP, Pacheco-Yanes J, Siqueira JF Jr, et al. Association between missed canals and apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 2019;52:400-6.
27. Baruwa AO, Martins JNR, Meirinhos J, et al. The influence of missed canals on the prevalence of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth: A cross-sectional study. J Endod. 2020;46:34-39.e1.
28. Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Reibel J, et al. Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20170210.
29. Burry JC, Stover S, Eichmiller F, et al. Outcomes of primary endodontic therapy provided by endodontic specialists compared with other providers. J Endod 2016;42:702-5.
30. Marques MD, Moreira B, Eriksen HM. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and results of endodontic treatment in an adult, Portuguese population. Int Endod J 1998;31:161-5.
31. Segura-Egea JJ, Jimenez-Pinzon A, Poyato-Ferrera M, et al. Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in an adult Spanish population. Int Endod J 2004;37:525-30.