open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
The osseointegrated implants react biomechanically in a different pattern to occlusal force, due to lack of the periodontal ligament unlike the natural teeth. The implants show markedly less movement and limited tactile sensitivity compared with the natural teeth. The implant occlusion concept aims to avoid overloading on the implants and to direct occlusal loads along the longitudinal axis of the implants, in order to compensate for the different biomechanics of the implants. Although many guidelines and theories on implant occlusion have been proposed, few have provided strong supportive evidence. Moreover, the outcome of treatment often quite successful in spite of different concepts of occlusion and there is an increasing tendency to doubt about the strict theoretical implant-specific occlusion concept. The purpose of this article is to review the previous reports about the concept of implant occlusion and discuss clinical occlusal considerations in implant rehabilitations.
1. Misch CE, Bides MW. Implant-protected occlusion. Int J Dent Symp 1994;2(1):32-37.
2. Kim Y, Oh T, Misch C, Wang H. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale.
3. Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, Santana U. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses. A review. Int Dent J 2008;58(3):139-145.
4. Sekine H, Komiyama Y, Hotta H. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixturesupporting systems. In van steeberghe D, editor: Tissue integration in oral maxillofacial reconstruction, Amsterdam, 1986. Excerpta Medica 1986:326-332.
5. Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant dentistry 1998;7(4):277-285.
6. Falk H. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses. Swed Dent J Suppl 1990;69:1-40.
7. Lundgren D, Laurell L, Falk H, Bergendal T. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58(2):197-203.
8. Klineberg I, Murray G. Osseoperception: sensory function and proprioception. Advances in dental research 1999;13(1):120-129.
9. Carlsson GE. Dental occlusion: modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics. Odontology 2009;97(1):8-17.
10. Schulte W. Implants and the periodontium. International dental journal 1995;45(1):16-26.
11. Parfitt GJ. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. Journal of Dental Research 1960;39(3):608-618.
12. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparison between implantsupported prostheses and teeth regarding passive threshold level. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1993;8(5).
13. Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Mericske E, Bürgin W. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(3):345-353.
14. Baek Y-W, Lim Y-J, Lee J-H, Ryu H-S. Restoration of a partially edentulous patient with an implant-supported removable partial denture: A case report. Quintessence International 2014;45(4).
15. Wie H. Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system. Clinical oral implants research 1995;6(1):47-53.
16. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Biomechanical aspects of fixed bridgework supported by natural teeth and endosseous implants. Periodontology 2000 1994;4(1):23-40.
17. Jörnéus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1992;7(3):353-359.
18. Kim K, Lim Y, Kim M, Kwon H, Yang J, Lee J, Yim S. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clinical oral implants research 2011;22(8):834.
19. Kim KS, Han JS, Lim YJ. Settling of abutments into implants and changes in removal torque in five different implant-abutment connections. Part 1: Cyclic loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(5):1079-1084.
20. Seol H-W, Heo S-J, Koak J-Y, Kim S-K, Kim S-K. Axial displacement of external and internal implant-abutment connection evaluated by linear mixed model analysis. International Journal of Oral &Maxillofacial Implants 2015;30(6).
21. Misch C. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses. Contemporary implant dentistry 1999:609-628.
22. Weinberg LA. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part II: Therapeutic differential loading. Journal of Oral Implantology 2001;27(6):302-310.