Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1010-0695
  • E-ISSN 2288-3339

A Comparative Study on Traditional Medicine in Korea and China : Administrative Structure, Role and Function

Journal of Korean Medicine / Journal of Korean Medicine, (P)1010-0695; (E)2288-3339
2008, v.29 no.4, pp.13-29




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Because of the changes of a variety of aspects of disease theory alternative to standard medicine, demand for traditional medicine has increased. This study was undertaken to grasp and compare traditional-medicine administrative structure, functions and role between Korea and China. According to our research, both nations promote policy related to traditional-medicine, yet there are various differences because of each nation's scale, political structure, medical system, etc. Especially, compare to the Korean government, the Chinese government not only has paid more attention to traditional medicine but also established and promoted a synthesis development strategy for a long time. Additionally, there is weakness in Korea's traditional medicine policy compared to the Chinese’s Synthetic development-strategy, which is the Oriental-policy Department and Korea Food&Drug administration. Therefore, to make up for the weakness, they will have to organize their role better and make a long-term development-strategy plan for traditional medicine.

keywords
Traditional medicine, policy, administrative structure, Korea and China, Traditional medicine, policy, administrative structure, Korea and China


Reference

1

1. WHO. Alma-Ata 1978, Primary health care, Report of the international conference on primary health care, Alma-Ata, USSR 6-12 September 1978. WHO. Geneva. 1979(“Health for All” Series, No.1).

2

2. WHO western pacific region. Regional strategy for traditional medicine in the Western Pacific. WHO. Geneva. 2002

3

3. WHO. National policy on traditional medicine and regulation of herbal medicines. WHO. Geneva. 2005

4

4. WHO western pacific region. Development of National Policy on Traditional Medicine. WHO. Geneva. 2000

5

5. 최용민. 한국 한방의료제도와 정책의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 동국대학교 박사논문. 1995 : p95

6

6. 성현제. 중국의 한의학 정책 및 현황. 한국한의학연구원. 1997:81-96

7

7. 최환영. 중국 정부의 중의학 세계화 전략에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 박사논문. 2005: 180-205

8

8. 신종오. 역대 한방정책관(직제와 인사). 민족의학신문. 게재일 2004.03.29

9

9. 보건복지부. 2000년 보건복지백서. 보건복지부. 2000

10

10. 보건복지부홈페이지. 조직도 [Internet] 2008 [cited Oct 12, 2008]. Available from: http://www.mw. go.kr

11

11. 식품의약품안전청 홈페이지. 조직도[Internet] 2003 [cited Oct 12, 2008]. Available from:http:// www.kfda.go.kr/index.html

12

12. 보건복지부 및 관계부처합동. 한의약육성발전 5개년종합계획(2006 ~ 2010). 보건복지부. 2005

13

13. 呂嘉戈. 挽救中医. 中國. 广西师范大学出版社. 2006: 157-181(611)

14

14. 국가중의약관리국(国家中医药管理局) 홈페이지. 각부문직능[Internet] 2006 Dec [cited Oct 12, 2008]. Available from:http://www.satcm.gov.cn /jgzn/20061226/115702.shtml

15

15. 국가식품약품감독관리국(国家食品药品监督管理局) 홈페이지. 전담업무[Internet] 2000 [cited Oct 12, 2008]. Available from:http://www.sfda. gov.cn/WS01/CL0001

16

16. 국가중의약관리국(国家中医药管理局). 중의약사업발전“십일오”계획(中医药事业发展“十一五”规划) 2007 Mar 8 [cited Oct 12, 2008]. Available from:http://www.satcm.gov.cn/zhuanti /lh/zyyzs/20070312/152544_4.shtml

17

17. 신용애. 보건인력에 대한 한방공공보건사업 인식조사와 한방공공보건 직무교육과정 개발. 한국보건복지인력개발원. 2006:40

18

18. 성현제. 한국과 동양 3국의 한의학 정책 비교연구. 한국한의학연구원. 1997:36-50

19

19. 법률법규(法律法規) 国家中医药管理局办公室、人事部办公厅、 卫生部办公厅印发 ≪采取紧急措施做好老中医药专家学术经验继承工作的实施细则≫ 的通知[Internet] 2003-2008[cited Oct 12, 2008]. Available from:http://law.lawtime.cn/d60 2665607759.html

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
  • 0KCI Citations
  • 0WOS Citations

Other articles from this issue

Recommanded Articles

상단으로 이동

Journal of Korean Medicine