ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

논문 상세

Home > 논문 상세
  • P-ISSN 1010-0695
  • E-ISSN 2288-3339

부부간의 사상체질 분포

Study on the Sasang Constitutional Difference between Married Men & Women

대한한의학회지 / Journal of Korean Medicine, (P)1010-0695; (E)2288-3339
2009, v.30 no.4, pp.59-63
김달래 (경희대학교)
김선형 (경희대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Objective:This study examined the distribution of married couples’ Sasang constitutions. Method:This study was researched clinically using medical records of 206 married couples who visited the Kyung Hee University East-West neo medical center in Seoul between May of 2006 and June of 2008. Results: 1.When a man is So-yangin, his wife’s Sasang constitutional type is So-yangin 7.7%, Tae-eumin 53.8%, So-eumin 38.5%. A Tae-eumin wife is significantly more common than the other two groups. 2.When a man is Tae-eumin, his wife’s Sasang constitutional type is Tae-yangin 0.9%, So-yangin 53.9%, Tae-eumin 8.7%, So-eumin 36.5%. Proportion of So-yangin wife is significantly higher than the other three groups. 3.When a man is So-eumin, his wife’s Sasang constitutional type is So-yangin 61.5%, Tae-eumin 29.2%, So-eumin 9.2%. A So-yangin wife is found at a significantly higher rate than the other two groups. Conclusion:A So-yangin man is most likely to marry a Tae-eumin woman. A Tae-eumin man is most likely to marry a So-yangin woman. A So-eumin man is most likely to marry a So-yangin woman.

keywords
Marriage, Sasang constitutional medicine, yin-yang


참고문헌

1

Ko BH. Ku DM, Kim KY, Kim DR, Park SS, Song IB etal. Sasang Medicine. jipmoondang. Seoul. 2005:418.

2

Kim SJ. Daesan. The book of changes -the second volume . Daeyuhakdang. Seoul. 2001:89-105.

3

Ko JH. Kim MY. The Relations among Personality Similarity, Reciprocity, Understanding and Liking in Adolescent Pairs. Korea Youth Consulting institute. 2004;12(1):53-64.

4

Jo HD, Jang KY. Korean College Students’ Evaluation of Self, Partner, and Preferred Types in Love Relationships Using MALPS. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2007;20(1):39-54.

5

Ko JH, Pack YH. The effects of self and Spouse’s Self-seteem, Communication Pattern, and Conflict Coping Behaviors on Marital Satisfaction. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2005;19(1):65-83.

6

Acitelli LK. Kenny DA. The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2001;8:167-185.

7

Yun HK, Lee SH. The relationships among spouse’s similarity of MBTI psychological types and marital communication, marital satisfaction. Journal of the Korea academy of sychological type. 2000;7:1-21.

8

Keirsey D, Marilyn B. My style and My face. Institute of psychological tests. Seoul. 1999.

9

Ko JH, Jun MJ. The Relation between Spouse Similarity and Marital Satisfaction An Analysis on Profile Similarity. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2003;17(3):1-16.

10

Kim DR. The interesting story of Sasang Constitution. Central life cycle. Seoul. 2002:232-240.

11

Baek YG. Sajujungsul. Myeongmundang Seoul. 1996:182-189.

12

Hirsh S. Kummerow J. The type of personality type and life. Korea Institute of psychological tests. 1997.

상단으로 이동

대한한의학회지