Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1010-0695
  • E-ISSN 2288-3339

Evaluation of Tongue Coating by Digital Tongue Diagnosis System between Halitosis and Non-Halitosis Patients.

Journal of Korean Medicine / Journal of Korean Medicine, (P)1010-0695; (E)2288-3339
2010, v.31 no.1, pp.23-29










  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective, case-controlled study was to assess the difference of the amount of tongue coating between halitosis and non-halitosis patients using a digital tongue diagnosis system (DTDS). Methods: Sixty-five patients complaining of oral malodor were recruited for the study. The level of volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) in the oral cavity of the patients was measured by a portable gas chromatography. All patients were then divided into two groups, the halitosis group (H2S 1.5ng/10ml, or CH3SH 0.5ng/10ml) and the non-halitosis group (H2S<1.5ng/10ml and CH3SH<0.5ng/10ml), according to the VSC level criteria published by Tonzetich. Tongue images of the two groups were acquired and analyzed by DTDS, followed by the analysis of the tongue coating scores. Results: The tongue coating scores of the halitosis group were significantly higher than of the non-halitosis group (P=0.033). Furthermore, the difference of the posterior tongue coating between the two groups was more significant (P=0.000). Conclusions: Halitosis patients were shown to have a thicker tongue coating than those in the non-halitosis group. Moreover, the posterior dorsum of the tongue should be observed more cautiously when dealing with halitosis patients. Also, the progress and state of the patient’s symptom of halitosis as diagnosed objectively by the portable gas chromatography could also possibly be analyzed instead by the DTDS tongue coating score.

keywords
halitosis, tongue coating, digital tongue diagnosis system, portable gas chromatography.


Reference

1

Tangerman A. Halitosis in medicine: a review. International Dental Journal. 2002;52(3):201-6.

2

Bosy A. Oral malodour: philosophical and practical aspects. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 1997;78(9):521-4.

3

Meskin LH. A breath of fresh air. Jornal of the American Dental Association. 1996;127(9):1282-6.

4

Miyazaki H, Arao M, Okamura K, Kawaguch Y, Toyofuku A. Hoshi K, et al. Tentative classification of halitosis and its treatment needs. Niigata Dental Journal 1999;32:7-11.

5

Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Examination, classification and treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000;66:257-61.

6

Tonzetich J, Ng S, Sc B. Reduction of malodor by oral cleansing procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;42:172-81.

7

Waler SM. On the transformation of sulfurcontaining amino acids and peptides to volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) in the human mouth. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:534-7.

8

Kim JS, Ryu BH. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Halitosis. J Koran Oriental Med 2007;28(2);13-21.

9

Shimizu T, Ueda T, Sakurai K. New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(6):442-7.

10

Lee CH, Kho HS, Chung SC, Lee SW, Kim YK. The relationship between volatile sulfur compounds and major halitosis-inducing factors. JPeriodontol. 2003;74(1):32-7.

11

Winkel EG, Roldan S, Van Winkelhoff AJ, Herrera D, Sanz M. Clinical effects of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, cetylpyridunium chloride and zinc-lactate on oral halitosis. A dual-center, double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(4):300-6.

12

Kim JS, Jung YJ, Park KM, Park JW. A Digital Tongue Imaging System for Tongue Coating Evaluation in Oral Malodour Patients. Oral Diseases. in press

13

Choe YS, Lee CS, Youn JY. Standalone breath analyzer for measuring halitosis. Breath 2009 International Conference on Breath and Breath Odor Research. Book of Abstracts. 2009:88.

14

Eo YH, Yoo HS, Kim JY, Park KM. Quantative Study on Tongue Images according to Exterior, Interior, Cold and Heat Patterns. J Korean Oriental Med 2006;27(2):134-44

15

Kim KR, Hong S, Kang HJ. The Literary Study on The History of ‘Fur of Tongue’. the Korean Society for Oriental Internal Medicine. 1999;20 (2):306-22.

16

Bosy A, Kulkarni GV, Rosenberg M, McCulloch CAG. Relationship of oral malodor to periodontitis: evidence of independence in discrete subpopulations. J Periodontol 1994;65:37-46.

17

Miyazaki H, Sakao S, Katoh Y, Takehara T. Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds certain oral health measurements in the general population. J Periodontol 1995;66:679-84.

18

Gomez SM, Danser MM, Sipos PM, Rowshani B, van der Welden U, van der Weijden GA. Tongue coating and salivary bacterial counts in healthy/gingivitis subjects and periodontal patients. J ClinPeriodontol 2001;28:970-8.

19

Shimizu T, Ueda T, Sakurai K. New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status. J OralRehabil 2007;34:442-7.

20

Rosenberg M, Kozlovsky A, Gelernter I, Cherniak O, Gabbay J, Baht R, et al. Self-estimation of Oral Malodor. J Dent Res. 1995;74(9): 1577-82.

21

Rosenberg M, McCulloch C. Measurement of Oral Malodor : Current Method and Future Prospects. J Periodontol. 1992;63:776-82.

22

Furne J, Majerus G, Lenton P, Springfield J, Levitt DG, Levitt MD. Comparison of Volatile Sulfur Compound Concentrations Measured with a Sulfide Detector vs. Gas Chromatography. J Dent Res 2002;81(2):140-3.

23

Yaegaki K, Calenic B, Takatoshi M. A portable gas chromatography for detecting VSCs in human breath air. Breath 2009 International Conference on Breath and Breath Odor Research. Book of Abstracts. 2009:89.

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
  • 0KCI Citations
  • 0WOS Citations

Other articles from this issue

Recommanded Articles

상단으로 이동

Journal of Korean Medicine