바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

  • P-ISSN1229-0076
  • E-ISSN2773-9351
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Leaderless Political Opposition: The 2008 Candlelight Protests and Changing Face of Korean Democracy

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2013, v.16 no.1, pp.89-119
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2013.16.1.003

Abstract

The recent examples of the protests of the so-called “Arab Spring” and the Occupy Wall Street Movement have shown the potential for mobile communication devices and networks over the internet to be turned into potent tools for political mobilization and activism. In light of these developments, this article seeks to reinterpret the 2008 candlelight protests against the import of U.S. beef in South Korea to demonstrate the potential of mobile communication technology and internet-based networks as tools of political resistance in South Korea. The 2008 candlelight protests suggest that this form of political opposition fostered by the internet is a “leaderless” opposition in that it lacks a central hierarchical leadership. The candlelight protests was a ‘multitude’ composed of various different participating groups that lacked a single, unifying collective identity enforced by a leadership. In the absence of such a unifying collective identity, the common was constructed through communication across pre-existing networks on the internet. Furthermore, it was a ‘self-organizing’ movement that lacked a central organization directing action. The protesters, however, were able to execute coordinated resistance through ‘swarm intelligence’ which, again, relied on mobile communication devices and the internet to facilitate rapid communication between the participants. Finally, the candlelight protests, though fueled by numerous and various grievances against the Lee Myung-bak government, presented a coherent opposition to the Lee Myung-bak government. This analysis concludes that, while traditional political institutions seem to have dominated cyber-electioneering, the internet remains a space for potential political resistance in South Korea.

keywords
multitude, candlelight protest, online activism, collective action, democratic participation

Reference

1.

Aleman, Jose. 2005. “Protest and Democratic Consolidation: A Korean Perspective.” International Journal of Korean Studies 9 (1): 71-90.

2.

Amnesty International. 2008. Policing the Candlelight Protests in South Korea. London: Amnesty International Publications.

3.

Anderson, Chris. n.d. “The Long Tail in a Nutshell.” Long Tail (blog). Accessed August 25, 2012 http://www.thelongtail.com/about.html.

4.

Bimber, Bruce, Cynthis Stohl, and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2009. “Technological Change and the Shifting Nature of Political Organization.” In Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, edited by Andrew Chadwick and Philip N. Howard, 72-85. New York: Routledge.

5.

Bonabeau, Eric, Marco Dorigo, and Guy Theraulaz. 1999. Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

6.

Canetti, Elias. 1962. Crowds and Power. Translated by Carol Stewart. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.

7.

Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.

8.

Chadwick, Andrew. 2007. “Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity.” Political Communication 24: 283-301.

9.

Chae, Songmu. 2008. “‘Yumocha budae’ geomchal josa nokko yeoya nollan” [Ruling and opposition parties debate prosecution office’s ‘Baby Stroller Brigade’ report]. Inews24, October 6. http://news.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_serial=362638&g_menu=050300.

10.

Chae, Suhong and Soojin Kim. 2010. “The Candlelight Protest and the Politics of the Baby Stroller Brigades.” Korea Journal 50 (3): 71-99.

11.

Chang, Woo Young (Jang Uyeong). 2010. “Network gaeinjuui-wa siminjeohang: 2008 nyeon chotbulsiwi-reul saryearo” [Networked Individualism and Civil Protest: The Case of Candlelight Protest 2008]. Hanguk jeongchi yeongu 19 (3): 25-55.

12.

Chang, Woo Young (Jang Uyeong). 2012. “Online gongnonjang-gwa jeongchi-chamyeo: 2008 nyeon chotbulsiwi-eseoui ‘Agora’” [Online Public Sphere and Political Participation: The Case of ‘Agora’ in 2008 Korean Candlelight Demonstration]. Hanguk jeongchi yeongu 21 (1): 1-26.

13.

Cho, Kisuk. 2009. “2008 chotbul-jiphoe chamyeoja-ui inyeomjeok jeonghyang: chinbuk-banmi-jwapa hogeun ban-sinjayu-juui?” [The Ideological Orientation of 2008 Candlelight Vigil Participants: Anti-American, pro-North Korean Left or Anti-Neoliberalism?]. Hanguk jeongchi hakhoebo 43 (3): 125-48.

14.

Gamson, William A. 1992. “The Social Psychology of Collective Action.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller, 53-76. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

15.

Gang, Ihyeon. 2008. “Lee Myung-bak jeongbu-neun ‘gwangubyeong peurendeulli’ jeongbu” [The Lee Myung-bak government is ‘a mad-cow-disease-friendly’ government]. Pressian, April 21. http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=60080421140437&Section=.

16.

Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Back Bay Books.

17.

Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360-80.

18.

Han, Bohui. 2009. “Hapbeop, bulbeop, mubeop geurigo beop eopsido sal saramdeul-i saneun beop” [Legality, illegality, lawlessness and the law for those people who live without the law]. In Geudae-neun wae chotbul-eul kkeusyeonnayo [Why did you put out your candles?], edited by Dangdae Bipyeong Gihoek Wiwonhoe, 247-69. Seoul: Sanchaekja.

19.

Han, Do-hyun. 2010. “Contemporary Korean Society Viewed through the Lens of the Candlelight Vigils of 2008.” Korea Journal 50 (3): 5-13.

20.

Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press.

22.

Hong, Sung-gi. 2010. “A Look at the Changes in Debate Structure in Korea through the Candlelight Vigils.” Korea Journal 50 (3): 100-27.

23.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies.” The American Political Science Review 65 (4): 991-1017.

24.

Kellerman, Barbara. 2012. The End of Leadership. New York: Harper Collins Publishers,.

25.

Kelly, Kevin. 1998. New Rules for the New Economy. New York: Viking.

26.

Kennedy, James, Russell C. Eberhart, with Yuhui Shi. 2001. Swarm Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

27.

Kim, Chul-kyoo and Hae-jin Lee. 2010. “Teenage Participants of the 2008 Candlelight Vigil: Their Social Characteristics and Changes in Political Views.” Korea Journal 50 (3): 14-37.

28.

Kim, Ji-young. 2007. “Cyberculture of Postmaterialism and Political Participation.” The Review of Korean Studies 10 (4): 291-320.

29.

Kim, Kyung-mi and Youn-min Park. 2011. “New Form of Citizen Participation in South Korea: 2008 Candlelight Protest and ‘Convergence Participation’.” Korean Journal of Sociology 45 (3): 155-70.

30.

Kim, Sangmin, Gukhui Bak, and Suyeon Sin. 2010. “‘Gwangubyeong chotbul’ 2 nyeon… geuttae geusaramdeul-eun jigeum” [Two years after the mad cow candlelight… that time, those people now]. Chosun Ilbo, May 10.

31.

Kim, Seonghwan. 2008. “Eoreundeul ‘10 daedeul-e bukkeureowo nawatta’” [Adults, ‘I came because the teens made me feel ashamed’]. Hankyoreh, May 18.

32.

Kim, Sunhyuk. 2002. “Civil Society and Democratization in South Korea.” In Korean Society: Civil Society, Democracy and the State, edited by Charles K. Armstrong, 53-72. New York: Routledge.

33.

Kim, Won. 2005. “Sahoeundong-eui saeroun guseongbangsik-e daehan yeongu: 2002 nyeon chotbulsiwi-reul jungsim-euro” [A Study of New Construction of Social Movement: A Case of Candle Demonstration in 2002]. Damnon 201 8 (2): 131-58.

34.

Kim, Young Ok. 2010. “Understanding the Candlelight Demonstration and Women’s Political Subjectivity through the Perspective of Changing Publicity.” Korea Journal 50 (3): 38-70.

35.

Klandermans, Bert. 1992. “The Social Construction of Protest and Multiorganizational Fields.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller, 77-103. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

36.

Kwak, Ki-sung. 2012. Media and Democratic Transition in South Korea. New York: Routledge.

37.

Lee, Sook-jong. 2005. “Democratization and Polarization in Korean Society.” Asian Perspective 29 (3): 99-125.

38.

Lim, Hyun-chin and Joonkoo Lee. 2010. “Mobile Communication, Political Participation and the Public Sphere: South Korea’s Experiences.” Media Asia 37 (4): 244-56.

39.

Lim, Merlyna and Mark E. Kann. 2008. “Politics: Deliberation, Mobilization, and Networked Practices of Agitation.” In Networked Publics, edited by Kazys Varnelis, 77-108. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

40.

Machiavelli, Niccolo. (1531) 1997. Discourses on Livy. Translated by Julia Conaway Bondanella and Peter Bondanella. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

41.

MBC News. 2012. “Minjuhwa-undong, chotbul-shiwi-do jongbuk?... gyoyungnyong DVD nollan” [Democratization movement and candlelight protests pro-North Korea?... an educational DVD draws criticism]. News Desk, October 22. http://imnews.imbc.com/replay/nwdesk/article/3164606_5780.html.

42.

Min, Kyung Bae. 2008. “Analog Government, Digital Citizens.” Global Asia 3 (3): 94-103.

43.

Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.

44.

Nickels, Joel. 2012. The Poetry of the Possible: Spontaneity, Modernism, and the Multitude. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

45.

Oliver, Pamela E. and Gerald Marwell. 1992. “Mobilizing Technologies for Collective Action.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller, 251-72. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press..

46.

O’Reilly, Tim. 2005. “What is Web 2.0?: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” O’Reilly Media, September 30. Accessed April 28, 2013. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.

47.

Park, Kimuck. 2012. “The Life Cycle of Newspaper Coverage of a Public Issue: Candlelight Protests against U.S. Beef Imports in South Korea.” The Korean Journal of Policy Studies 27 (1): 41-56.

48.

Park, Sangpyo. 2008. “‘Jigeum-eun gollanhada, gidaryeo dalla’” [‘It’s not possible now, get them to wait’]. Pressian, July 22. http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=60080722104240&Section=.

49.

Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody. New York: Penguin Books.

50.

Shirky, Clay. 2010. Cognitive Surplus. New York: Penguin Books.

51.

Taylor, Verta and Nancy E. Whittier. 1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller, 104-30. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

52.

Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow and Company.

53.

Varnelis, Kazys. 2008. “Conclusion: The Meaning of Network Culture.” In Networked Publics, edited by Kazys Varnelis, 145-64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

54.

Virno, Paulo. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

55.

Yi, Jaemyeong and Juhwan Im. 2008. “(Hyeonjang) ‘uriga moimyeon hal su itta’ ‘10 il sicheong-euro’” [(On Scene) ‘We can do it if we come together’ ‘to city hall on the 10th’]. Hankyoreh, June 8. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general /292166.html. Accessed May 31, 2013.

56.

Yun, Seongyi. 2003. “The Internet and the 2002 Presidential Election in South Korea.” Korea Journal 43 (2): 209-29.

57.

Yun, Seongyi and Woo Young Chang. 2010. “New Media and Political Socialization of Teenagers: The Case of the 2008 Candlelight Protests in Korea.” Asian Perspective 35 (1): 135-62.

58.

Yun, Young Min. 2003. “An Analysis of Cyber-Electioneering: Focusing on the 2002 Presidential Election in Korea.” Korea Journal 43 (3): 141-64.

The Review of Korean Studies