바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

  • P-ISSN1229-0076
  • E-ISSN2773-9351
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Critical Analysis of Chongryon Secondary English Textbooks Published between 1968 and 1974

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2019, v.22 no.2, pp.177-204
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2019.22.2.008
(University of Queensland)
(The University of Queensland)

Abstract

This article investigates the Chongryon (a pro-North Korean organisation in Japan) English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks published for Japanese-speaking ethnic Koreans between 1968 and 1974 by using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The Chongryon established Korean ethnic schools, known as Joseonhakgyo, in Japan using educational grants from North Korea. The study’s findings show that a significant proportion of the textbooks were influenced by North Korean ideology. The textbooks encouraged students to identify themselves as North Koreans, to perceive North Korea as their homeland, to admire Kim Il Sung as their real leader, and to live harmoniously as a unified single community in Japan. The textbooks promoted the belief that South Koreans “suffering” under the US occupation could be liberated by Kim Il Sung, who was described as a saviour for all Koreans. Such findings demonstrate that Joseonhakgyo EFL education was employed as a tool to lead Chongryon students to follow North Korea’s rule and Chongryon ideology. This implies that today’s Chongryon community has had a complex history with North Korea, and demonstrates the scope of change that has occurred within the organisation’s education and social system.

keywords
Chongryon organisation, EFL education, Korean minority in Japan, ideology, North Korea

Reference

1.

Bell, M. 2018. “Patriotic Revolutionaries and Imperial Sympathizers: Identity and Selfhood of Korean-Japanese Migrants from Japan to North Korea.”Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 7 (2): 237-65.

2.

Bramley, N. R. 2001. “Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in the Construction of ‘Self’ and ‘Other’ in Political Interviews.” PhD diss., Australian National University.

3.

Burke, C., J. Copenhaver, and M. Carpenter. 2004. “Animals as People in Children’s Literature.” Language Arts 81 (3): 205-13.

4.

Chapman, D. 2006. “Discourses of Multicultural Coexistence and the ‘Oldcomer’Korean Residents of Japan.” Asian Ethnicity 7 (1): 89-102.

5.

Cho, M. H. 2017. “Multilingual Ability of Koreans Living in Japan: Focusing on Korean and English Textbooks.” Paper presented at Australian Symposium on Korean Language Learning and Teaching 2017, University of South Australia Business School, Adelaide, November 20.

6.

Curdt-Christiansen, X. R. 2017. “Language Socialization through Textbooks.”In Language Socialization, Encyclopedia of Language and Education, edited by P. A. Duff and S. May, 195-210. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

7.

Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd edition. Oxon: Routledge.

8.

Fairclough, N. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 177-97.

9.

Fang, Z., and M. Schleppegrell. 2010. “Disciplinary Literacies across Content Areas: Supporting Secondary Reading through Functional Language Analysis.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53 (7): 587-97.

10.

Fitzgibbon, L. 2013. “Ideologies and Power Relations in a Global Commercial English Language Textbook Used in South Korean Universities: A Critical Image Analysis and a Critical Discourse Analysis.” PhD diss., University of Queensland.

11.

Geerdts, M., G. Van De Walle, and V. LoBue. 2016. “Using Animals to Teach Children Biology: Exploring the Use of Biological Explanations in Children’s Anthropomorphic Storybooks.” Early Education and Development 27 (8): 1237-49.

12.

Jin, H. G. 1999. “The Study on Relations of Chongryun (North Koreans in Japan) and North Korea.” International Society for Korean Studies in Seoul 1999 (1): 576-604.

13.

Kim, Y. H. 2006. “Narrative Education in North Korea.” Korean Language Education Research 17: 381-426.

14.

Lee, D. B. 2000. “The Ideological Construction of Culture in Korean Language Textbooks: A Historical Discourse Analysis.” PhD diss., University of Queensland.

15.

Lee, D. B. 2006. “Analysis of North Korean Language Textbooks: Altered Juchism Ideology.” Korean Language Research 27 (December): 399-435.

16.

Lee, D. B. 2017. “Chongryon Identity as Represented in Chongryon Korean Language Textbooks.” Humanity and Social Sciences Studies 18 (2): 247-66.

17.

Lee, J. H. 2009. “A Study on SLA Theories Reflected in the Korean English Curricula.” MA diss., Sungkyunkwan University.

18.

Lee, M. 2014. “South Korea’s Democratization Movement of the 1970s and 80s and Communicative Interaction in Transnational Ecumenical Networks.” International Journal of Korean History 19 (2): 241-70.

19.

Lim, J. 2015. Leader Symbols and Personality Cult in North Korea: The Leader State. Oxon: Routledge.

20.

Machin, M., and A. Mayr. 2015. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London:SAGE Publications Ltd.

21.

Mizuno, N., and G. Mun. 2015. Zainichi Chosenjin: reskishi to genzai [Zainichi:History and Present Day]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

22.

Motani, Y. 2002. “Towards a More Just Educational Policy for Minorities in Japan: The Case of Korean Ethnic Schools.” Comparative Education 38(2): 225-37.

23.

Ryang, S. 1997. North Korean in Japan: Language, Ideology and Identity. Colorado: Westview Press.

24.

Ryang, S. 2000. “The North Korean Homeland of Koreans in Japan.” In Koreans in Japan: Critical Voices from the Margin, edited by S. Ryang, 32-54. Oxon:Routledge.

25.

Song, J. M. 2011. “Curricular Changes of Chongryun Korean Schools in Japan:Focused on Korean Textbooks.” Journal of Korean Language Education 22(1): 145-78.

26.

Venezky, R. L. 1992. “Textbooks in School and Society.” In Handbook on Research on Curriculum, edited by Phillip W. Jackson, 436-61. New York:Macmillan Publishing Co.

The Review of Korean Studies