- P-ISSN1229-0076
- E-ISSN2773-9351
- SCOPUS, ESCI
Perception of August 15 Remembered in and Forgotten from Korean Textbooks
Abstract
There seems to be a significant variation in the memory of August 15, 1945, between the nation and individuals despite the fact that this memory is historicization of shared experiences, i.e., collective memory. This can be seen by examining the memories at the national level. South Korea remembers August 15 in terms of defeat, liberation, and restoration, whereas North Korea remembers this event in connection with victory and liberation, Japan with end of war or defeat, China with victory and liberation, and Taiwan with end of war and restoration. South Korea and North Korea at first remembered this day as “Liberation Day,” but the name of this day changed after independent governments were established in each nation. South Korea changed the name of this day to “Independence Day,” whereas North Korea called it “Memorial Day for National Liberation.” This division in names represents a giant barrier as great as the division of the system, and the rift in the two different celebrations of the same memory became wider, aggravated by the asymmetric development of economics and exclusiveness between the two nations. Especially in the case of South Korea, August 15 has been remembered as a mixture of the day of liberation and restoration, but it became firmly established as Independence Day in the 1970s, which continued to the present. On the other hand, the term liberation has been strictly excluded as being a derogatory leftist word. Transformation in the memory of the process of liberation or restoration is apparent now that socialism has fallen, the Cold War system has been dismantled in recent years, and confrontation between the North and South Koreas have been mitigated. This will soon lead to a transformation in the memory of August 15.
- keywords
- Memory, liberation, restoration, theory on the legitimacy ofKorean provisional government, textbook., Memory, liberation, restoration, theory on the legitimacy ofKorean provisional government, textbook.
참고문헌
Byeon Tae Seob. 1968. High School National History for General HighSchools. Seoul,
______. 1973. High School National History for General High Schools. Seoul,
TheSocial Life Subject for Middle School Students and the Subject of NationalHistory,
. Eulyu MunhwasaHanguk Yeoksa Yeongu-hoe ed. Hanguksa gyogwaseo-ui himang-eul chajaseo80 The Review of Korean Studies Searching for Hope in Korean Textbooks,
Ministry of Education,
.Approval in 1962 and published in 1964. Seoul,
(2003) Korean Modern and Contemporary History. , Seoul:Jungang Gyoyuk Jinheung Yeonguso.
The Changes in the National History textbooks after Liberation Critical Review of History,
(2003) Korean Modern and Contemporary History, Seoul:Geumseong Chulpansa.
(2003) Haebang ihu guksa gyogwaseo-ui‘ jeongtongseong’ insik iljae gangjeomgi minjok undongsa seosuleul jungsimeuro” (The Perception of ‘Legitimacy’ Reflected in National History Textbooks after the Liberation: Reviewing the Historical Description of the Nationalist Movements during the Japanese Occupation):Yeoksa gyoyuk. March 1985,
The History of Joseon,
(______.1947.joseonyeoksa) The History of Joseon,
. Revised in 1950 and 1951 reprinted in 1952 and 1955. Seoul,
Lee Weon Sun. 1973. High School National History for General High Schools.Seoul,
Ministry of Education. 1955. Decree of the Ministry of Education Item 45,
(1997) enacted and declared on 1955.8.1 Middle School Education CurriculumStandards for Society and National History Subjects in Elementary,
Perception of August 15 Remembered in and Forgotten from Korean Textbooks 81______. 1968. National History for Industrial High Schools.,
(1997) ______. 1969. Decree of the Ministry of Education Item 251 revised anddeclared on 9.4 Standards for Society and National History Subjects inElementary, Middle, and High Schools
(1997) Standards for Society and National History Subjects in Elementary Ways to Publish National History,
(1997) Textbooks under the Approval System.,
______. 1976. “Ways to Ensure Freedom.”,
(1997) Middle School Education Curriculum, Decree of the Ministry of Education Item 442 (revised and issued on December 31,,
(1996) High School National History,
(2001) Education Curriculum Documents ,
The Lost 12 Years of National History Classes CriticalReview of History,
(1999) High School National History for General High Schools. Seoul, Gwangmyeong Chulpansa.
(2002) Jeohang, geurigo hyeongsang-hwawa gyoyuk gwajeong,
Yeoksa Munjae Yeongusoand National Board of History Teachers.Shin Seok Ho. 1948.,
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수