ISSN : 1229-0076
This article examines several major arguments regarding the issue of nationalism that appeared during the era of the so-called “Greater East Asia Co- Prosperity Sphere.” Differences in opinions appeared in discussions and debates among scholars who were engaged in studies of themes related to the concept of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere after the end of the war. Against the backdrop of the Japanese reappearance in Southeast Asian countries after the war and the normalization of Korean-Japanese diplomatic relations, these scholars continued their studies while considering the new role Japan should assume in the region. The conservative approach has increasingly gained momentum, which contains sharp differences from the atmosphere of Western and other East Asian scholars. Japanese imperialists devised and established a hierarchical structure that placed Japan at the top and other countries at lower levels through this concept of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. This hierarchical structure was seemingly intended to negate the Western concept of “colonialism” and “self-determination of nations.” However, it actually shows the typical principle of divide and rule that encouraged discrimination and misconception within East Asia. The countries that were split by mutual control and opposition were bound together by the same goal of opposing the U.S. and the Western world. The case of Joseon and Taiwan, which were at once colonies and regarded as extensions of Japanese imperialism, clearly shows the contradictions inherent in this idea.
Akashi Yoji, (1995) Kaidai" Daitoa kensetsu shingikai,
edited by Kikakuin and Daitoa Kensetsu,
(19421995) Daitoa Kensetsu Shingikai.,
edited by Kikakuin,
Peter, (1992) Imperialism without Colonies The Vision of a Greater East,
Gerow, Aaron, (2002) Tatakau kan kyaku--daitoa kyoeiken no nihon eiga to ,
(1977) Daitoa kyoeiken no rinen to jittai,
Kikakuin, (1995) Daitoa kensetsu,
Kim Keong-il, (2003) Ilje-ui singminjibaewa donghwajuui(Colonial,
Domination and Assimilation of Imperial Japan,
Study of the History of Korean Thought,
Minagawa Masaki, (2000) ‘Daitoa kyoeiken’ shiso no ronri to sonokiketsu-seijigakusha,
(1940) Kokka no mokuteki to tairiku keiei,
edited by Keijo Teikoku Daigaku,
(1992) Daitoa kyoeiken to tojo seiken,
Okazaki Hisahiko, (2000) Daitoa kyoeiken-ajia no dokuritsu o jitsugen subeku,
昭和精神史のこころみ-16-大東亞共榮圈,
Ono Ken’ichi, (1992) Daitoa kyoeiken no koso to kyobo--Keishoshitewa,
Ozaki Hotsumi, (2004) Nanpomondai to shinamondai(南方問題と支那,
December, Reprinted in Yonetani Masafumi ed,
(2004) Toa kyoeiken no kiteiniyokotawaru juyo mondai(東亞共,
Reprinted in Obi Toshito ed,
Mark R, (1988) The Rise and Fall of the Japanese in,
(1885-1945) University of Hawaii Press,
Takeuchi Yoshimi et al, (1963) Daitoa kyoeiken no rinen to genjitsu,
Yamamoto Yuzo, (1996) Daitoa kyoeiken koso to sonokozo?‘daitoa kensetsu,
Furuya Tetsuo, edited by Furuya Tetsuo,
Yun Hwi-tak, (2001) Manjugugui 2deung gung(gong)min(Second-Class,