바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

Export Performance Analysis of Indonesian Processed Seaweed to The Seven Main Destination Countries from 2010 to 2019

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2022, v.12 no.3, pp.13-22
Isna Aissatussiri ASSHIDIQ (Statistics Indonesia)
Neli AGUSTINA (Politeknik Statistika STIS)

Abstract

Purpose: The research aims to analyze the export performance of processed seaweed, its competitiveness, and determinants on seven main destination countries. Research design, data and methodology: The study uses data of seven main destination countries of Indonesian processed seaweed from 2010 to 2019. For competitiveness analysis, the study uses Revealed Comparative Advantage, Export Product Dynamics, and X-Model of Potential Export Product. Results: The study reveals that the export performance has decreased on all five countries except for Japan and USA. The X-Model analysis shows that the market classification has increased or been stable in every country except for Germany and France. GDP per capita of each destination country and competitiveness index have positive and significance effect while other factors have negative and significance effect. Conclusions: In 2019, Indonesia’s processed seaweed market in Japan, United States, and France are on potential market, while Singapore and Italy are on optimistic market. In the future, Indonesia’s processed seaweed export can be focused more on countries that have a good market potential. To improve the export volume, GDP per capita of destination country, and competitiveness index of Indonesian processed seaweed should be higher, while export price, economic distance, and real exchange rate should be lower.

keywords
Indonesia Export Seaweed, RCA, EPD, X-Model, Panel Data Regression Analysis

참고문헌

1.

Basith, Abdul. (2018). Kenaikan Harga Rumput Laut Mengerek Nilai Ekspor. https://industri.kontan.co.id/news/kenaikan harga-rumput-laut-mengerek-nilai-ekspor

2.

Bustami, B. R., & Hidayat, P. (2013). "Analisis Daya Saing Produk Ekspor Provinsi Sumatera Utara". Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan 2(1): 56-71.

3.

Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales. (2020). Geodesic Distances. http://www.cepi.fr/distance/dist_cepii.zip

4.

Denantica, D. P. (2019). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ekspor Rumput Laut dan Kajian Trend Volume Ekspor Rumput Laut Indonesia ke China (Periode Tahun 1999-2011). Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute.

5.

Esterhuizen. (2006). Measuring and Analyzing Competitiveness in The Agribusiness Sector: Methodological and Analytical Framework. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

6.

Fitzsimons, E., Hogan, V., & Neary, J.P. (1999). "Explaining the Volume of North-South Trade in Ireland: A Gravity Model Approach". Dublin: Department of Political Economy College Dublin.

7.

Greene, William H. (2012). Econometric Analysis. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

8.

Hasibuan, A. M., R, Nurmalina, & A., Wahyudi. (2012). "Analisis Kinerja dan Daya Saing Perdagangan Biji Kakao dan Produk Kakao Olahan Indonesia di Pasar Internasional". Buletin RISTI, 3(1): 57-70.

9.

Indonesian Trade Ministry. (2017). Kementerian Perdagangan RI:Negara Tujuan Ekspor 10 Komoditas Potensial. Jakarta:Indonesian Trade Ministry.

10.

Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. (2020). Data Produksi Rumput Laut Nasional. Jakarta: Publication of Statistics and Infographics of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

11.

K., Li, L., Song, & X., Zhou. (2008). "Component Trade and China's Global Economic Integration". UNU-WIDER Research Paper 101: 1-23.

12.

Kanaka, S., & M, Chinadurai. (2012). "A Study of Comparative Advantage of Indian Agricultural Exports". Journal of Management and Science 2(3): 1-9.

13.

Kotler, Philip., & Armstrong, Gary. (2008). Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran. (Bob Sabaran, Translator). Jakarta: Erlangga.

14.

Krugman, Paul R., & Obstfeld, Maurice. (1994). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Boston: Pearson.

15.

Krugman, Paul R. (2009). "The Increasing Returns Revolution in Trade and Geography". American Economic Review, 99(3):561-71.

16.

Mankiw, N. G. (2006). Makroekonomi Edisi Keenam. (Hardani W, Barnadi D, & Saat S, Translator). Jakarta: Erlangga.

17.

Rahardja, P., & Manurung. (2010). Teori Ekonomi Makro Suatu Pengantar Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Publishing Institute of the Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia.

18.

Safitri, Viola R., & Kartiasih, F. (2019). Daya Saing dan Faktor Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ekspor Nanas Indonesia. Jurnal Hortikultura Indonesia 10(1), 63–73.

19.

Simanjuntak, S. B. (1992) Analisis Daya Saing dan Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah terhadap Daya Saing Perusahaan Kelapa Sawit Indonesia. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute Postgraduate Program.

20.

Statistics Indonesia. (2020). Buletin Statistik Perdagangan Luar Negeri Ekspor Menurut HS Desember 2019. Jakarta: Statistics Indonesia.

21.

Statistics Indonesia. (2021). Buletin Statistik Perdagangan Luar Negeri Ekspor Menurut HS Desember 2020. Jakarta: Statistics Indonesia.

22.

United Nation Statistics. (2021). United Nations Commodity Trade (COMTRADE) Statistics Database. http://www.unctad.org

23.

Wahyudi, S.T., & Anggita, R.S. (2015). The Gravity Model of Indonesian Bilateral Trade. International Journal of Social and Local Economic Governance (IJLEG), 1(2): 153-156.

24.

World Bank. (2021). World Bank Open Data. http://data.worldbank.org

Asian Journal of Business Environment