바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2765-6934

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.5 No.4
Citation Share

The Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Creativity: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2015, v.5 no.4, pp.73-81
Joo-Seok Chae (Chungbuk National University)
Nam-Gyum Lee (Chungbuk National University)

Soon-Young Park (HR & Training Ambassador Hotel)
Joo-Seok, C. , Nam-Gyum, L. , & Soon-Young, P. (2015). The Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Creativity: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy. Asian Journal of Business Environment, 5(4), 73-81.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigated the effects of leaders of national universities on faculty creativity. The study examined transformational leadership and creativity theories and investigated self-efficacy, the parameter between transformational leadership and creativity, to examine its moderating effect and provide policy implications for national universities. Research design, data, and methodology – This study built four hypotheses based on the literature review, and tested these using a survey methodology. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 15.0. Result – At the national universities, the results were as follows: charisma of leaders had a positive influence on member creativity; intellectual stimulus of leaders had a positive influence on member creativity; and, individual consideration of leaders had a positive influence on member creativity. Therefore, leaders’ transformational leadership had a positive influence on member creativity. Conclusion – Creativity is thought to be important for organizational survival and continuous development at rapidly changing education administrations. Educational administration leaders should exercise transformational leadership to develop member creativity. Member self-efficacy, which had a mediating effect on creativity, requires leadership to develop it.

keywords
Transformational Leadership, Self-Efficacy, Creativity.

Reference

1.

Amabile, T. M (1983). The social Psychology of creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.

2.

Amabile, T. M (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167

3.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

4.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. NY: Free Press.

5.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The Implications of Transactional and Transformational Leadership for Individual, Team, and Organizational Development. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Passmore (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

6.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1987). Transformational Leadership:A Response to Critiques, in M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (eds.), Leadership Theory and Research:Perspectives and Directions. San Diego, Cal.: Academic Press.

7.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1988). Transformation Leadership, Charisma, and Beyond, In Hunt, J, G., Baglia, E, R., Dacher, H, P., & Schrieshemim, C, A.(Eds.), Emerging Leadership Vistas (pp.29-50), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

8.

Baik, Ki-Bok (2002). Organizational Behavior. Seoul, Korea:Changminsa.

9.

Burns, J, M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row. Isaksen, S, G., Stein, M, I., Hilla, D, A., & Gryskiewicz, S, S.

10.

(1983). A Proposed Model for the Formulation of Creativity Research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 67-75.

11.

Jo, Gil-Hwan (2014). The Influence of Positive Psychological Capital on Job Attitudes, and the Roles of Affect and Work-Family Conflict/Enrichment in the Relationship. Department of Business Administration Graduate School, Chungbuk National University.

12.

Kim, Ah-Young., & Cha, Jung-Eun (2003). Multi-level Analysis of the Effects of Teacher-efficacy and Students` Academic Self-efficacy on Academic Achievement. Korean Educational Psychologr Journal, 17(2), 25-43.

13.

Lee, Il-Woo (2004). Study on the Influence of Leadership Pattern on the Employee’s Creativity and Innovative Activity. School of Business, Hanyang University.

14.

Lee, Chang-Won, Park, Hee-Bong., & Adler, R. W. (2003). Transformational Leadership Behaviors and Leadership Effectiveness of Chief Executive in Local Governments. The Korean Association for Public Administration, 37(1), 19-36.

15.

Mumford, M, D., & Gustafson, S, B. (1988). Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application and Innovation, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, No.1, pp.27-43.

16.

Nunnally, J, C. (1967). Psychometric Theory, New York :McGraw-Hill.

17.

Shalley, C. E. (1991). Matching Creativity Requirements and the Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.43, No.2, pp.215-223.

18.

Waldman, D, A., & Bass, B, M. (1987). Leadership and Outcomes of the Performance Appraisal Process. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 177-186.

19.

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management review, 18(2), 293-321.

20.

Zhou, J., George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction leads to Creativity : Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696.

Asian Journal of Business Environment

e-Submission OA Policy