바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Political Discourse Among Key Twitter Users: The Case Of Sejong City In South Korea

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia / Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, (E)2383-9449
2013, v.12 no.1, pp.65-79
https://doi.org/10.17477/JCEA.2013.12.1.065


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper examines communication patterns of key Twitter users by considering the socially and politically controversial Sejong City issue in South Korea. The network and message data were drawn from twtkr.com. Social network-based indicators and visualization methods were used to analyze political discourse among key Twitter users over time and illustrate various types of Tweets by these users and the interconnection between these key users. In addition, the study examines general Twitter users' participation in the discussion on the issue. The results indicate that some Twitter profiles of media outlets tend to be very dominant in terms of their message output, whereas their Tweets are not likely to be circulated by other users. Noteworthy is that Twitter profiles of individuals who are geographically affiliated with the issue are likely to play an important role in the flow of communication.

keywords

Reference

1.

Ache, K. A., & Wallace, L. S. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube.

2.

Agarwal, N., Liu, H., Tang, L., & Yu, P. S. Identifying the influential bloggers in a com-munity.

3.

Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. The emerging viewertariat: Explaining Twitter responses to Nick Griffin's appearance on BBC Question Time.

4.

Bentivegna, S, L. A. Lievrouw, & S. Livingstone (ed.). Politics and new media, Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs.

5.

Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Hiltz, S. R., Noll, J., Preece, J., Stohr, E. A., Turoff, M., & Van de Walle, B. Toward virtual community knowledge evolution.

6.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis.

7.

Brown, J., & Reingen, P. H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior.

8.

Burt, R. S. The social capital of opinion leaders.

9.

Card, J. Korea's four rivers project: Economic boost or boondoggle?; Yale Environment 360.

10.

Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. P. Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy.

11.

Chin, A., & Chignell, M. A social hypertext model for finding community in blogs.

12.

Chung, C., & Park, H. W. Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents.

13.

Cision, & Bates, D. 2009 Social Media & Online Usage Study.

14.

Garg, R., Telang, R., Smith, M., Krackhardt, D., & Krishnan, R. Peer influence and information diffusion in online networks: An empirical analysis.

15.

Gladwell, M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things can make a Big Difference.

16.

Hsu, C.-L., & Park, H. W. Sociology of hyperlink networks of Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: A case study of South Korea.

17.

Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope.

18.

Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. Micro-blogging as online word of mouth branding.

19.

Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities.

20.

Kang, K.. Twitter is the only global SNS that has been successful in Korea.

21.

Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P. P., & Sarvary, M. Network effects and personal influences: Diffu-sion of an online social network.

22.

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. Personal Influence: The Part played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications.

23.

Keller, E. All media are social: The unique roles of TV, print and online in driving word of mouth.

24.

Kim, I. K. Socioeconomic concentration in the Seoul metropolitan area and its implications in the urbanization process of Korea.

25.

Kong, H. J., Park, H. W., & Han, S. K. S. The talkative, the popular, and the influential Korean Twitter users.

26.

Kwon, Y. S., Kim, S. W., Park, S., Lim, S. H., & Lee, J. B. The information diffusion model in the blog world.

27.

Leavitt, A., Burchard, E., Fisher, D., & Gilbert, S. 'The influentials: New Approaches for analyzing influence on Twitter', 2 September 2009.

28.

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.

29.

Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life.

30.

Milstein, S., Chowdhury, A., Hochmuth, G., Lorica, B., & Magoulas, R. Twitter and the micro-messaging revolution: Communication, connections, and immediacy-140 characters at a time.

31.

O Riordan, N., Adam, F., & O’Reilly, P. Innovation in virtual worlds: Social structure and diffusion.

32.

Palmiter, A. Live streaming video jumps 600% in past year.

33.

Park, H. W., & Lee, Y. O. A mixed text analysis of user comments in a portal site: 'BBKgate' in the 2007 presidential election of South Korea.

34.

Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L.. Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text.

35.

Park, N., Jeong, J. Y., & Han, J. H. Who are the power bloggers as potential target public in PR?: Public issue involvement-production of messages model.

36.

Park, S. J., Lim, Y. S., Sams, S., Nam, S. M., & Park, H. W. Networked politics on Cyworld: The text and sentiment of Korean political profiles.

37.

Parker, E. B. Implications of new information technology.

38.

Pettey, C., & Stevens, H. Gartner highlights four ways in which enterprises are using Twitter.

39.

Rheingold, H.. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution.

40.

Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations.

41.

Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A.. Influence and passivity in social media.

42.

Rosen, D. Flock theory: Cooperative evolution and self-organization of social systems.

43.

Shapiro, M. A., So, M., & Park, H. W. Quantifying the national innovationsystem: Interregional collaboration networks in South Korea.

44.

Sunstein, C. R. On Rumours: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Them, What Can Be Done.

45.

Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., and Wellman, B. Geography of Twitter Networks.

46.

Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders.

47.

Wincorea1. In Twitter.

48.

Yang, J., & Counts, S. Comparing information diffusion structure in weblogs and microblogs.

49.

Yang, L., Fam, K.-S., & Harris, P. Culture influence on information diffusion in onine communities: A conceptual model.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia