바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • E-ISSN2383-9449
  • SCOPUS

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia / Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, (E)2383-9449
2014, v.13 no.2, pp.57-68
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2014.13.2.057
Banerjee, Vasabjit

Abstract

How do party organizations respond to newly evolving social groups? Research on Indian party organizations reveals that in multiethnic societies with uneven modernization between social groups, internally competitive parties respond better to newly evolving groups. Moreover, it is claimed: the same dynamic works vis-<TEX>$\grave{a}$</TEX>-vis homogenous societies with cleavages based on economic differences; and, the pattern holds regardless of differences in electoral institutions. This study examines these claims by testing whether factional competition correlated with recruitment into Japan's Liberal Democratic Party in 1972 and 1983. Japan had a single-nontransferable-vote system with multi-member districts, while the research on India assumes a first-past-the-post system with single-member districts. This study conducts a difference of means test on the population of new and old politicians in the LDP in 1972 and 1983 with a pooled variance adjustment to account for differences in populations' size. The findings show that intra-party competition and recruitment are not correlated in Japan, thus tentatively rejecting both claims.

keywords
Multiethnic, Party, Japan, India, Electoral Institutions

Reference

1.

Lipset, Seymour M., and Stein Rokkan, Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan (eds.). Cleavage Structures, Party systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction;Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives.

2.

Mainwaring, Scott P., and Timothy R. Scully, Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully (eds.). Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America;Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America.

3.

Maisrikrod, Surin, John Hsieh and David Newman (eds.). Political Reform and the New Thai Electoral System: Old Habits Die Hard?;How Asia Votes.

4.

McAllister, Ian. (2007). Social Structure and Party Support in the East Asian Democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(2), 225-249.

5.

Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior.

6.

Okimoto, Daniel I.. Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology.

7.

Pempel, T.J., T. J. Pempel (ed.). Introduction;Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes.

8.

Ramseyer, J. Mark and Frances M. Rosenbluth F. Japan's Political Marketplace.

9.

Reed, Steven R.. Japan Election Data: House of Representatives, 1947-1990.

10.

Reed, Steven R.. (1994). Democracy and the Personal Vote: A Cautionary Tale from Japan. Electoral Studies, 13(1), 17-28. 10.1016/0261-3794(94)90004-3.

11.

Reed, Steven R. and John M. Bolland, Bernard Grofman, et al. (eds.). The Fragmentation Effect of SNTV in Japan;Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution.

12.

Reed, Steven R. (2007). Duverger's Law is Working in Japan. Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies, 22, 96-106.

13.

Richardson, Bradley. Japanese Democracy: Power, Coordination, and Performance.

14.

Riker, William H. The Theory of Political Coalitions.

15.

Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Vol. 1.

16.

Schlesinger Jacob M. Shadow Shoguns: The Rise and Fall of Japan's Postwar Political Machine.

17.

Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Shugart. Seats and Votes.

18.

Varshney, Ashutosh. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India.

19.

Wang, Yeh-lih. (1996). The Political Consequences of the Electoral System: Single Nontransferable Voting in Taiwan. Issues & Studies, 32(8), 85-104.

20.

Wolferen, Karel V.. The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Political in a Stateless Nation.

21.

Wilkinson, Steven I.. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India.

22.

Baerwald, Hans, and Akira Hashimoto. (1983). Japan in 1982: Doing Nothing is Best?. Asian Survey, 23(1), 53-61. 10.2307/2644326.

23.

Baerwald, Hans. Party Politics in Japan.

24.

Bogaards Matthew. (2004). Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party Systems in Africa. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 173-197. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00150.x.

25.

Bouissou, Jean-Marie. (2001). Party factions and the politics of coalition: Japanese politics under the "system of 1955". Electoral Studies, 20(4), 581-602. 10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00050-0.

26.

Cox, Gary W., and Frances Rosenbluth. (1993). The Electoral Fortunes of Legislative Factions in Japan. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 577-589. 10.2307/2938737.

27.

Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald Stokes. The American Voter.

28.

Chandra, Kanchan. (2000). Elite Incorporation in Multiethnic Societies. Asian Survey, 40(5), 836-865. 10.2307/3021179.

29.

Chandra, Kanchan. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India.

30.

Cox, Gary W.. Marking Votes Count: Strategic Co-ordination in the World's Electoral Systems.

31.

Cox, Gary W., Frances McCall Rosenbluth and Michael F. Thies. (1999). Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party. British Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 33-56. 10.1017/S0007123499000022.

32.

Cox, Gary W., Frances M. Rosenbluth and Michael F. Thies. (2000). Electoral Rules, Career Ambitions, and Party Structure: Comparing Factions in Japan's Upper and Lower Houses. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 115-122. 10.2307/2669297.

33.

Dalton, Russell J. and Steven Weldon. (2007). Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization. Party Politics, 13(2), 179-196. 10.1177/1354068807073856.

34.

Di Palma, Giuseppe,T. J. Pempel (ed.). Establishing Party Dominance;Uncommon Democracies: The One Party Dominant Regimes.

35.

Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State.

36.

Hsieh, John F. (2009). The Origins and Consequences of Electoral Reform in Taiwan. Issues & Studies, 45(2), 1-22.

37.

Eisenstadt, Todd A. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategic and Electoral Institutions.

38.

Flanagan, Scott, Shinsaku Kohei, Ichiro Miyake, and Bradley Richardson. The Japanese Voter.

39.

Fukui, Haruhiro, Gail L. Bernstein and Haruhiro Fukui (eds.). Electoral Laws in the Japanese Party System;Japan and the World.

40.

Kabashima, Ikuo and Yoshito Ishio. (1998). The Instability of Party Identification Among Eligible Japanese Voters: A Seven-Wave Panel Study, 1993-1996. Party Politics, 4(2), 151-176. 10.1177/1354068898004002002.

41.

Kohno, Masaru. (1992). Rational Foundations for the Organization of the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan. World Politics, 44(3), 369-397. 10.2307/2010543.

42.

Krauss, Ellis S. and Robert Pekkanen. (2004). Explaining Party Adaptation to Electoral Reform: The Discreet Charm of the LDP?. Journal of Japanese Studies, 30(1), 1-34. 10.1353/jjs.2004.0021.

43.

Krauss, Ellis S. and Robert J. Pekkanen. The Rise and Fall of Japan's LDP: Political Party Organizations as Historical Institutions.

44.

Leiserson, Michael. (1967). Factions and Coalitions in One-Party Japan: An Interpretation based on the Theory of Games. American Political Science Review, 62(3), 770-787.

45.

Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia