바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Online Social Support: Which Posts Were Answered?

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia / Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, (E)2383-9449
2009, v.8 no.1, pp.31-46
https://doi.org/10.17477/JCEA.2009.8.1.031

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to find out which posts were answered in a text-based computer-mediated social support group. Specifically, the present study examined the effects of two variables on support-seeking behaviors: support-seeking strategies and gender. A revised typology of support-seeking strategies originally proposed in the Sensitive Interaction Systems Theory (SIST) model was employed for the study. Data were collected from the PTT psychosis discussion group, the largest BBS in the Chinese-speaking community, for a period of 30 months from February 2004 to July 2006. In general, the results indicated that posts with more asking, less crying and less hinting were answered more than posts with more hinting, more crying and less asking. However, although different support-seeking strategies did affect support-seeking behaviors, gender did not have an impact on which posts were answered.

keywords

Reference

1.

Albrecht, T. L., Burleson, B R., and Goldsmith, D., M. L. Knapp and G.R. Miller (eds.). Supportive communication.;Handbook of interpersonal communication.

2.

Barbee, A. P., and Cunningham, M. R., B.R. Burleson (ed.). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. In Communication yearbook 18.

3.

Barbee, A. P., Rowatt, T. L., and Cunningham, M. R., P. A. Anderson and L. K.Guerrero (eds.). When a friend is in need: Feelings about seeking, giving, and receiving social support.;Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, application, and contexts.

4.

Basow, S. A., and Rubenfeld, K.. "Troubles talk": Effects of gender and gendertyping.

5.

Bauer, M., M. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds.). Classical content analysis: A review. In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound.

6.

Bertero, C. M. Types and sources of social support for people afflicted with cancer.

7.

Biddle, L., Gunnell, D., Sharp, D., and Donovan, J. L.. Factors influencing help skking in mentally distressed young adults: A cross-sectional survey.

8.

Braithwaite, P. O., Waldron, V. R., and Finn, J. Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities.

9.

Burleson, B. R., and MacGeorge, E. L., M. L Knapp and J. A. Daly (eds.). Supportive communication.;Handbook of interpersonal communication.

10.

Chang, H. J.. Faculty members' external networks: the interaction between academic and political networks.

11.

Chang, H. J., and Tseng, I. (forthcoming). A cross-cultural analysis of social network sites in Taiwan and U.S.A.: Comparisons between Wretch and My Space.

12.

Colvin, J., Chenoweth, L., Bold. M., and Harding, C.. Caregivers of older adults: Advantages of internet-based social support.

13.

Coulson, N. S.. Receiving social support online: An analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome.

14.

Cutrona, C. E., and Suhr, J.A.. Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors.

15.

Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., Oldfield III, E. C., and Barbee, A. P.. Close relationships and social support in coping with HIV: A test of sensitive interaction systems theory.

16.

Eichhorn, K. C.. Soliciting and providing social support over the Internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups.

17.

Franzen, E.. Does the Internet make us lonely?.

18.

Galagher, J., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S.. Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups.

19.

Goldsmith, D.J., and Dun, S.A. Sex difference and similarities in the communication of social support.

20.

Goldsmith, D.J.. Communicating social support.

21.

Gulley, M. R.. Sequential analysis of social support elicitation and provision behaviors.

22.

Hall, E. T. Beyond Culture.

23.

Herring, S. C.. Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications.

24.

Herring, S. C.. Content analysis for new media: Rethinking the paradigm.

25.

Hofstede, G.. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values.

26.

Jones, S.. Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net.

27.

Kunkel, A W., and Burleson, B.R.. Assessing explanations for sex difference in emotional support: A test of the difference cultures and skill specialization accounts.

28.

Ley, B. L.. Vive les roses!: The architecture of commitment in an online pregnancy and mothering group.

29.

MacGeorge, E. L.. Gender differences in attributions and emotions in helping contexts.

30.

Mann, C., and Stewart, F.. Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online.

31.

Mickelson, K. D., S. Kiesler (ed.). Seeking social support: Parents in electronic support groups. In Culture of the internet.

32.

Miyata, K., and Kobayashi, T.. Causal relationship between Internet use and social capital in Japan.

33.

Plickert, G., Cote, R. R., and Wellman, B. It's not who you know. It's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom?.

34.

Robinson, J. D., and Turner, J.. Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal social support: Cancer and older adults.

35.

Shaw, L. H., and Gant, L. M.. In defense of the internet: The relationship between internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support.

36.

Tidwell, L. C., and Walther, J.. Computer-mdiated communication effects on disclosure, depressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time.

37.

Tichon, J. G., and Shapiro, M. The process of sharing social support in cyberspace.

38.

Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., and Meyers, J.. Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support.

39.

Walther, J. B., V. Manusov, and M.L. Patterson (eds.). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication or :( and the net :('s with you, :) and you :) alone. In the Sage Handbook of Nonverbal Communication.

40.

Walther, J. B., and Boyd, S.. Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses, C. A. Lin and D. Atkin (eds.).

41.

Walther, J.B., and D'Addario, K. P. The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication.

42.

Walther, J. B., and Park, M. R., M. L. Knapp and G.R. Miller (eds.). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In Handbook of interpersonal communication.

43.

Wright, K.. Social support satisfaction, on-line communication apprehension, and perceived life stress within computer-mediated support groups.

44.

Wright, K. Computer-Mediated Social Support, Older Adults, and Coping.

45.

Xie, B.. Multimodal computer-mediated communication and social support among older Chinese Internet users.

46.

Ye, J.. Traditional and online support networks in the cross-cultural adaptation of Chinese international students in the United States.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia