바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Podcasting and Politics in Singapore: An Experimental Study of Medium Effects

Podcasting and Politics in Singapore: An Experimental Study of Medium Effects

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia / Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, (E)2383-9449
2009, v.8 no.2, pp.27-43
https://doi.org/10.17477/JCEA.2009.8.2.027
Marko M.
Clarice
Han Teck
Pam
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

A ban on political podcasting during the General Elections 2006 in Singapore was justified by the Singaporean government on the grounds that the new medium had a greater power to influence voters than traditional modes of political discourse. A between-subjects controlled experiment was conducted to test whether podcasts of political speeches had a greater power to influence voters' evaluations of political candidates and likelihood of voting for them than online text-based transcripts of the same speeches. The study also examined whether mere exposure to political speeches online, irrespective of the modality, had an effect on voters' more general political preferences, i.e. the likelihood of support and voting for the opposition. The findings suggest that political podcasts were no more persuasive than text-based websites and that the effects on political preferences, if any, were likely due the exposure to political content online, not because of the nature of the medium. The implications of the findings are discussed.

keywords

참고문헌

1.

Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N.. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election; Divided they blog.

2.

Advisory Council on the Impact of New Media on Society (AIMS). Engaging New Media: Challenging Old Assumptions.

3.

Becker, L., & Whitney, D. C.. Effects of media dependencies: Audience assessment of government.

4.

Berry, R. Will the iPod kill the radio star? Profiling podcasting as radio.

5.

Bimber, B., & Davis, R.. Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections.

6.

Black, D. A.. Internet radio: A case study in medium specificity.

7.

Bositis, D. A., & Steinel, D.. A synoptic history and typology of experimental research in political science.

8.

Brock, T. C.. Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production.

9.

Brown, K.. A comparison of factual recall from film and print stimuli.

10.

Carr, D.. How Obama tapped into social networks' power, New York Times.

11.

Chaffee, S., & Frank, S.. How Amercians get political information: Print versus broadcast news.

12.

Chaffee, S., & Tims, A. R., M. Burgoon (Ed.). News media use in adolescence: Implications for political cognitions;Communication Yearbook 6.

13.

Chaffee, S., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G.. Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992.

14.

Cheong, J.. Pod luck; Read me...now hear me - after blogs, podcasting is the next big thing as more Singaporeans jostle to be heard on the Internet, Straits Times.

15.

Chia, S.-A.. Singapore: Govt explains ban on political podcasts, Straits Times.

16.

Chia, S.-A., Low, A., & Luo, S.. Oppositional parties slam podcast ban rule; Mixed reactions among bloggers here, but guidelines clearer now, Straits Times.

17.

Chua, H. H.. Singapore's blog-happy teenagers; Survey to assess how netsavvy people are find half of teens have online blogs of podcast, Straits Times.

18.

Clark, R.. Reconsidering research on learning from media.

19.

Cohen, E. L., & Willis, C.. One nation under radio: digital and public memory after September 11.

20.

Cohen, J.. A power primer.

21.

Coleman, S.. Blogs and the new politics of listening.

22.

Culbertson, H., & Stempel, G. H. I.. How media use and reliance affect knowledge level.

23.

Dalrymple, K. E., & Scheufele, D. A.. Finally informing the electorate? How the internet got people thinking about presidential politics in 2004.

24.

DeLys, S., & Foley, M.. The exchange. A Radio-Web Project for Creative Practitioners and Researchers.

25.

Dorning, M.. Political web sites get personal: Candidates let backers write blogs, network.

26.

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change.

27.

Eldersveld, S. J. Theory and method in voting behavior research.

28.

Eldersveld, S. J.. Experimental propaganda techniques and voting behavior.

29.

Eveland, W. P. J., & Dunwoody, S.. An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the web versus print.

30.

Eveland, W. P. J., Seo, M., & Marton, K. Learning from the news in campaign 2000: An experimental comparison of TV news, newspapers, and online news.

31.

Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. Effects of time of day and medium of presentation on immediate recall of violent and non-violent news.

32.

Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Green, A.. Remembering science: The recall of factual information as a function of the presentation mode.

33.

George, C. The internet's political impact and the penetration/participation paradox in Malaysia and Singapore.

34.

Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment.

35.

Gonsell, H. F., & Gill, N. H. An analysis of the 1932 presidential vote in Chicago.

36.

Government's response to the recommendations made by the advisory council on the impact of new media on society (AIMS) in the report "engaging new media - challenging old assumptions.

37.

Hammersley, B. Audible Revolution, Media Guardian.

38.

Heim, J., Asting, T., & Schliemann, T.. Medium effects on persuasion.

39.

iDA. Infocomm usage - Households & Individual.

40.

Just, M., & Crigler, A. Learning from the news: Experiments in media, modality, and reporting about star wars.

41.

Kozma, R. B.. Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.

42.

Lee, L.. Party flouts rules with Chee's podcast on its website, Straits Times.

43.

Lewicki, D., & Ziaukas, T.. The digital tea leaves of Election 2000: The Internet and the future of presidential politics.

44.

Lewin, J.. How Barrack Obama beat John McCain with new media.

45.

Lowry, D. T.. Demographic similarity, attitudinal similarity, and attitude change.

46.

MacDonald, J. F., Marsden, M. T., & Geist, C. D. Radio and television studies and American culture.

47.

Malone, J.. Obama's online organizing far outpaces competitors.

48.

McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G.. Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes.

49.

McLuhan, M.. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man.

50.

McLuhan, M.. The medium is the message.

51.

Media watchdog slams podcast ban, The Straits Times.

52.

Miller, M. M., Singletary, M. W., & Chen, S.. The roper question and television vs newspapers as sources of news.

53.

Miskin, S., & Grant, R. Political advertising in Australia.

54.

Nah, S., Veenstra, A. S., & Shah, D. V. The Internet and anti-war activism: A case study of information, expression, and action.

55.

Norris, P., & Sanders, D.. Message or medium? Campaign learning during the 2001 British general election.

56.

OFCOM. Radio-preparing for the future.

57.

Paolino, P., & Shaw, D. R. Can the Internet help outside candidates win the presidential nomination?.

58.

Patterson, T. E., & McClure, R. The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national elections.

59.

Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T., D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables;The handbook of social pscyhology, Vol. 1.

60.

Reese, S. D., Rutigliano, L., Hyun, K., & Jeong, J.. Mapping the blogosphere: Professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena.

61.

Rodan, G.. The Internet and political control in Singapore.

62.

Rubin, D. B.. Teaching statistical inference for causal effects in experiments and observational studies.

63.

Schramm, W.. Big media, little media.

64.

Schulman, G., & Worrall, C. Salience patterns, source credibility, and the sleeper effect.

65.

Singapore Statutes Online. (n.d.). Parliamentary Elections Act.

66.

Smith, A. The Internet's role in campaign 2008.

67.

Stauffer, J., Frost, R., & Rybolt, W. Recall and learning from broadcast news: Is print better?.

68.

Stelter, B. The facebooker who friended Obama, New York Times.

69.

Sternthal, B., Phillips, L. W., & Dholakia, R. The persuasive effect of source credibility: A situational analysis.

70.

Stromer-Galley, J.. On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it.

71.

Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J.. Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites.

72.

Sundar, S. S., Narayan, S., Obregon, R., & Uppal, C.. Does web advertising work? Memory for print vs. online media.

73.

Sung-Ki, J.. Web users back opposition party, Korea Times.

74.

Tae-gyu, K.. UCC looms as national priority, Korea Times.

75.

Tannebaum, D. A., & Kerrick, J.. Effects of newscasts' items leads upon listener interpretation.

76.

Terdiman, D.. You, Too, Can Be a Podcaster.

77.

Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. L. Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper.

78.

Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N.. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge.

79.

Trammell, K. D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J., & Sapp, A. M. Rzeczpospolita blogow [Republic of blog]: Examining polish bloggers through content analysis.

80.

Trammell, K. D., Williams, A. P., Postelnicu, M., & Landreville, K. D.. Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate web sites and blogs through text and technical features.

81.

Tremayne, M., Zheng, N., Lee, J. K., & Jeong, J.. Issue publics on the web: Applying network theory to the war blogosphere.

82.

Vella, M. John Edwards, the e-candidate; The presidential hopeful's web efforts show the benefits and limits of using emerging media to gain an early edge in the '08 campaign.

83.

Wall, T.. The political economy of Internet radio.

84.

Wilson, C. E. The effect of medium on loss of information.

85.

Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients access to attitude-relevant information in memory.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia