open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Regardless of the type of implant, the loss of the implant crestal bone in the first year during post-implanttreatment and after functioning by prosthetic treatment is often greater than that of the following year. Possible causes for early implant bone loss include surgical trauma, occlusal overload, peri-implantitis, microgap, bio-logical width, and crest modules of the implant itself. Plaque index and Gingival index values were also found significantly higher for implants without KM(keratinized mucosa). KM of at least 2 mm should be maintained. Contour of implant restoration is known as one of the risk indicators of peri-implantitis. Prevalence of peri-implantitis was significantly greater in the bone-level group when the emergence angle was >30 degrees compared to an angle ≤30 degrees. Emergence angle of >30 degrees is a signific ianndti craistokr for peri-implantitis and convex profile creates an additional risk for bone-level implants, but not fo rtissuelevel implants. Biocom-patible materials should be used for all implant prosthetics, especially f otrhmeation of high polished surfaces with a reasonable appearance on the transmucosal part of the imp rlaensttorations. Bacterial products of the biofilm provoke an immune response in the gingival tissues. As btihoefilm maturesmore complex inter-reactions occur and bacteria with more virulent qualities apprpoevaork,ing a more complex immune system response. Inflammation and immune response cannot be resolved until the bacteria biofilm is removed. To minimize the incidence of complications, dental professionals should make great effort in choosing reliable components and materials for implant- supported FDPs and the patients should be placed in well-structured maintenance system after treatment.
1. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002;73(3):322-33.
2. Fransson C, Tomasi C, Pikner SS, Gröndahl K, Wennström JL, Leyland AH, et al. Severity and pattern of peri-implantitis-associated bone loss. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(5):442-8.
3. Thoma DS, Alshihri A, Fontolliet A, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE, Benic GI. Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(5):2111-9.
4. Page RC, Schroeder HE. Pathogenesis of inflammatory periodontal disease. A summary of current work. Lab Invest. 1976;34(3):235-49.
5. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89 Suppl 1:313-8.
6. Boynueğri D, Nemli SK, Kasko YA. Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(8):928-33.
7. Katafuchi M, Weinstein BF, Leroux BG, Chen YW, Daubert DM. Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis: A crosssectional radiographic analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(2):225-32.
8. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Salvi GE, Pjetursson BE. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:346-50.
9. Renvert S, Roos-Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):305-15.
10. Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of periimplantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):316-32.
11. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:22-38.
12. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Chuang SK, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(1):102-10.
13. French D, Naito M, Linke B. Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4325 implants: Distribution and incidence and the effect on bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(2):108-14.
14. Varthis S, Tarnow DP, Randi A. Interproximal Open Contacts Between Implant Restorations and Adjacent Teeth. Prevalence -Causes - Possible Solutions. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):806-10.
15. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Salvi GE, Pjetursson BE. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:346-50.