open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
It had been a common belief that the primary cause of failure of endodontically treated teeth depends on the quality of the root canal treatment. Disinfection of root canals via cleaning and shaping is the most important to resolve the periapical lesion, however, following coronal restoration of endodontically treated teeth is also considerably significant to rehabilitate the teeth, and to prevent the re-infection of root canal system. In the clinical situation, the importance of post-endodontic restoration including the removal of residual caries and unfavorable previous restoration, and following adequately performed dentin adhesion and core restoration seems to be passed over because it did not show the immediate complications of postoperative hypersensitivity. A post-endodontic coronal restoration aims to prevent micro-leakage and subsequent bacterial ingress and contamination of the root canal complex. Thus, the choice of materials and methods, and the quality for post-endodontic restoration may influence the durability and prognosis of the teeth. In this article, the various considerations in the management of post-endodontic restoration and recent advance in restorative materials will be reviewed.
1. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37(7):895-902.
2. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18(7):332-335.
3. Schwartz RS. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system—the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod 2006;32(12):1125-1134.
4. Perdigao J, Swift Jr E, Denehy G, Wefel J, Donly K. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994;73(1):44-55.
5. Chersoni S, Acquaviva GL, Prati C, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Pashley DH, et al. In vivo fluid movement through dentin adhesives in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 2005;84(3):223-227.
6. Jang JH, Jeon BK, Mo SY, Park M, Choi D, Choi KK, et al. Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of HEMAfree universal dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J 2019;38(1):101-106.
7. Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2014;30(10):1126-1135.
8. Maktabi H, Ibrahim M, Alkhubaizi Q, Weir M, Xu H, Strassler H, et al. Underperforming light curing procedures trigger detrimental irra-diance-dependent biofilm response on incrementally placed dental composites. J Dent 2019;88:103110.
9. Pitout E, Oberholzer TG, Blignaut E, Molepo J. Coronal leakage of teeth root-filled with gutta-percha or Resilon root canal filling material. J Endod 2006;32(9):879-881.
10. Suh B. Principles of ahdesion Dentistry. Well publisher; 2013.
11. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5(1):27-40.
12. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5(2):91-105.
13. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-Fill Composites: A Review of the Current Literature. J Adhes Dent 2017;19(2):95-109.
14. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Invest 2013;17(1):227-235.
15. Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A, Ioppolo P, Pedulla E, Bedini R, et al. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs. J Endod 2017;43(6):995-1000.
16. Moore B, Verdelis K, Kishen A, Dao T, Friedman S. Impacts of Contracted Endodontic Cavities on Instrumentation Efficacy and Biomechanical Responses in Maxillary Molars. J Endod 2016;42(12):1779-1783.
17. Neelakantan P, Khan K, Hei Ng GP, Yip CY, Zhang C, Pan Cheung GS. Does the Orifice-directed Dentin Conservation Access Design Debride Pulp Chamber and Mesial Root Canal Systems of Mandibular Molars Similar to a Traditional Access Design? J Endod 2018;44(2):274-279.
18. Jiang Q, Huang Y, Tu X, Li Z, He Y, Yang X. Biomechanical Properties of First Maxillary Molars with Different Endodontic Cavities: A Finite Element Analysis. J Endod 2018;44(8):1283-1288.
19. Zhang Y, Liu Y, She Y, Liang Y, Xu F, Fang C. The Effect of Endodontic Access Cavities on Fracture Resistance of First Maxillary Molar Using the Extended Finite Element Method. J Endod 2019;45(3):316-321.
20. Ozyurek T, Ulker O, Demiryurek EO, Yilmaz F. The Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation Design on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Traditional Versus Conservative Preparation. J Endod 2018;44(5):800-805.