open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
The meta-evaluation of dental education evaluation and accreditation was conceptualized as 'evaluating the evaluation and accreditation system' in order to improve the quality of evaluation. In order to perform meta-evaluation of dental education evaluation and accreditation, which seeks improvement directions by comprehensively and systematically evaluating and analyzing dental education evaluation and accreditation, the development of evaluation criteria should be preceded. The purpose of this study is to redefine the direction of dental education evaluation and accreditation and to establish improvement plans by developing criteria for meta-evaluation and confirming its validity. In this study, the meta-evaluation criteria and sub-evaluation system for evaluation and accreditation by Korean Institute of Dental Education Evaluation (KIDEE) were developed. In order to confirm the validity and reliability of the meta-evaluation criteria and sub-evaluation system, a questionnaire was conducted targeting the self-evaluation members of the evaluation target institutions with a high understanding of evaluation and the evaluation and accreditation members of KIDEE. The developed meta-evaluation criteria and subsystem for evaluation and accreditation should be used for the purpose of introducing a quality improvement system for evaluation and accreditation. It is expected that the meta-evaluation of KIDEE will be conducted regularly as a meta-evaluation criteria and sub-system faithfully to this purpose.
1. 김순남. 대학평가의 메타평가 준거개발. The Journal of Educational Administration, 2006;24(2):371-402.
2. Orata, PT. Evaluating Evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 1940;33(9): 641-661.
3. Scriven M. Meta-Evaluation Revisited. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, 2009;6(11):3-8.
4. Tacketti S, Grant J, Mmari K. Designing an evaluation framework for WFME basic standards for medical education. Medical Teach 2016;38(3):291-296.
5. 김성훈, 김신영, 서민원, 양길성. 교육 프로그램 메타평가 기준개발. 교육평가연구, 2009;22(3):557-585.
6. 서인혜, 공계순. 메타분석연구에서 나타난 프로그램 구성요소의 실태:증거기반 프로그램 개발의 관점에서. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 2018;49(3):247-275.
7. 조옥경, 최금진. 공학교육인증 평가체제의 메타평가 준거 개발. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 2013;16(3):28-41.
8. 한국의학교육평가원. 의과대학 인증평가의 메타평가. 2012.
9. 한국행정연구원. 정부업무평가에 대한 메타평가 및 개선방안 연구. 2012.
10. Crampton P, Mehdizadeh L, Page M, Knight L, Griffin A. Realist evaluation of UK medical education quality assurance. BMJ open. 2019;9(12):1-9.
11. Larkins SL, Preston R, Matte MC, Lindemann IC, Samson R, Tandinco FD, Buso D, Ross SJ, Palsdottir B, Neusy AJ. Measuring social accountability in health professional education:Development and international pilot testing of an evaluation framework. Med Teach, 2013;35(1):32–45.
12. Ross SJ, Preston R, Lindemann IC, Matte MC, Samson R, Tandinco FD, Larkins SL, Palsdottir B, Neusy AJ. The Training for Health Equity Network Evaluation Framework: A Pilot Study at Five Health Professional Schools. Education for Health, 2014;27(2):116-126.
13. WFME. Criteria for establishment of a new medical school:Guidance for governments, regulators and universities. 2017.
14. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 1975;28:563-575.
15. 김각균, 김윤진, 이재일, 신제원. 제1주기 인증평가결과분석. 한국치의학교육학회지, 2013;6(1):17-25.
16. 김경년, 김윤진, 이재일, 신제원(2013). 제1주기 치의학 교육 인증평가에 대한 의견조사. 한국치의학교육학회지, 2013;6(1):26-31.