바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

복합레진 2급 와동 직접수복에서 술후 과민증을 줄이기 위한 전략

Strategy for Reducing Postoperative Hypersensitivity in Class II Direct Restoration using Composite Resin

Abstract

One of the major causes of postoperative hypersensitivity following direct composite resin restoration is mi croleakage. Adequate adhesive technique, incremental filling, lining of elastic material, and regulation of light curing speed would be helpful for reducing microleakage via polymerization shrinkage. In proximal box res toration, pre-wedging, sectional matrix system, and proper resin applicator are recommended to form adequate proximal contact and contour.

keywords
class II cavity, direct restoration, postoperative hypersensitivity, composite resin

참고문헌

1.

1. Stanley, H. R., Going, R. E. & Chauncey, H. H. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 91, 817-825 (1975).

2.

2. Stanley, H. R. Pulpal responses to ionomer cements--biological characteristics. J Am Dent Assoc 120, 25-29 (1990).

3.

3. Pashley, D. H. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 16, 70-77 (1990).

4.

4. Meryon, S. D. The model cavity method incorporating dentine. Int Endod J 21, 79-84 (1988).

5.

5. Murray, P. E. et al. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity. Am J Dent 15, 41-46 (2002).

6.

6. Davidson, C. L. & Feilzer, A. J. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25, 435-440 (1997).

7.

7. Soares, C. J. et al. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements - What do we need to know? Braz Oral Res 31, e62 (2017).

8.

8. Feilzer, A. J., De Gee, A. J. & Davidson, C. L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66, 1636-1639 (1987).

9.

9. Price, R. B., Dérand, T., Andreou, P. & Murphy, D. The effect of two configuration factors, time, and thermal cycling on resin to dentin bond strengths. Biomaterials 24, 1013-1021 (2003).

10.

10. Davidson, C. L. & de Gee, A. J. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63, 146-148 (1984).

11.

11. Hirabayashi, S., Hood, J. A. & Hirasawa, T. The extent of polymerization of Class II light-cured composite resin restorations; effects of incremental placement technique, exposure time and heating for resin inlays. Dent Mater J 12, 159-170 (1993).

12.

12. van Dijken, J. W., Hörstedt, P. & Waern, R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 11, 165-172(1998).

13.

13. Unterbrink, G. L. & Liebenberg, W. H. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30, 249-257 (1999).

14.

14. Yap, A. U., Ng, S. C. & Siow, K. S. Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. Oper Dent 26, 260-266 (2001).

15.

15. Ritter, A. V. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry. (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2017).

16.

16. Van Landuyt, K. L. et al. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 34, 77-85 (2006).

17.

17. Peumans, M. et al. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step selfetch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 26, 1176-1184 (2010).

logo