바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 0376-4672

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

60권 5호

디지털 셋업 모형에서 제작된 jig를 이용한 두 가지 브라켓 간접 접착 방법의 정확성 비교

Comparison of accuracy of two indirect bonding methods using a jig fabricated from digital setup model

이종현 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실)
최동순 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실)
장인산 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실)
차봉근 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실)
대한치과의사협회지 / The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, (P)0376-4672; (E)2713-7961
2022, v.60 no.5, pp.258-268
https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2022.60.5.001
이종현, 최동순, 장인산, & 차봉근. (2022). 디지털 셋업 모형에서 제작된 jig를 이용한 두 가지 브라켓 간접 접착 방법의 정확성 비교. 대한치과의사협회지, 60(5), 258-268, https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2022.60.5.001

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of indirect bonding using a jig fabricated from the digital setup model. Materials and Methods: Total 120 bracket jigs for the maxillary teeth were fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) from 10 maxillary digital setup models. Brackets were bonded using the jigs on five models (Group 1), and using the jigs and additional vacuum tray on five models (Group 2). The models were scanned again and superimposed with each initial digital models for evaluation of bonding accuracy. Results: Indirect bonding using CAD/CAM jigs showed the average bonding error of ± 0.1 mm at linear measurement and ± 2.0°at angular measurement except labio-lingual inclination (3.36°) at the premolar of Group 1. The bonding accuracy were not statistically different between both groups. Conclusions: CAD/CAM jigs can transfer the bracket to the desired position regardless of whether additional vacuum tray is used or not, and this indirect bonding system provides clinically acceptable accuracy.

keywords
Accuracy, Bracket, Bonding, Digital model, Superimposition

참고문헌

1.

1. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly AA, Dietz VS. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod 1972;62(3):236–244.

2.

2. Kalange JT. Indirect bonding: A comprehensive review of the advantages. World J Orthod 2004; 5(4): 301-307.

3.

3. 차봉근. 교정용 브라켓의 간접 접착법. 대한치과의사협회지1999;37(7):530-535.

4.

4. Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2003;73(2):176-180.

5.

5. Moskowitz EM, Knight LD, Sheridan JJ, Esmay T, Tovilo K. A new look at indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 1996;30(5):277–281.

6.

6. Read MJF, O’Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98(3):259–262.

7.

7. Shiau JY, Rasmussen ST, Phelps AE, Enlow DH, Wolf GR. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique. Angle Orthod 1993;63(3):213–220.

8.

8. 차정열. CAD/CAM 기술을 활용한 최신 교정치료-교정진단에서 간접부착술식까지. 대한치과의사협회지 2014;52(1):17-26.

9.

9. Garino F, Garino GB. Computer-aided interactive indirect bonding. Prog Orthod 2005;6(2):214-623.

10.

10. Mayhew MJ. Computer-aided bracket placement for indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 2005;39(11):653-660.

11.

11. Redmond WJ, Redmond MJ, Redmond WR. The OrthoCAD bracket placement solution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125(5):645-646.

12.

12. Castilla AE, Crowe JJ, Moses JR, Wang M, Ferracane JL, Covell DA, Jr. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2014;84(4):607-614.

13.

13. Schmid J, Brenner D, Recheis W, Hofer-Picout P, Brenner M, Crismani AG. Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models. Eur J Orthod 2018;40(5):549-555.

14.

14. Son KH, Park JW, Lee DK, Kim KD, Baek SH. New virtual orthodontic treatment system for indirect bonding using the stereolithographic technique. Korean J Orthod 2011;41(2):138-146.

15.

15. Kim J, Chun YS, Kim M. Accuracy of bracket positions with a CAD/CAM indirect bonding system in posterior teeth with different cusp heights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153(2):298-307.

16.

16. Yun D, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK. Clinical application of an intraoral scanner for serial evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement:A preliminary study. Korean J Orthod 2018;48(4):262-267.

17.

17. Park JH, Choi JY, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Lee KJ, Nelson G. Threedimensional evaluation of the transfer accuracy of a bracket jig fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing to the anterior dentition: An in vitro study. Korean J Orthod 2021;51(6):375-386.

18.

18. Pottier T, Brient A, Turpin YL, Chauvel B, Meuric V, Sorel O, Brezulier D. Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(11):3889-3897.

19.

19. Jung YR, Park JM, Chun YS, Lee KN, Kim M. Accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners: Effects of the presence of orthodontic bracket. Int J Comput Dent 2016;19(3):203-215.

20.

20. Park GH, Son K, Lee KB. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121(5):803–810.

21.

21. Creekmore TD. Dr. Thomas D. Creekmore on torque. J Clin Orthod 1979;13(5):305-310.

22.

22. Dellinger EL. A scientific assessment of the straight-wire appliance. Am J orthod 1978;73(3):290-299.

23.

23. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr., Bills ED. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(5):589-599.

24.

24. Xue C, Xu H, Guo Y, Xu L, Dhami Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Ma J, Bai D. Accurate bracket placement using a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing-guided bonding device: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157(2):269-277.

25.

25. Grünheid T, Lee MS, Larson BE. Transfer accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane trays for indirect bonding. Angle Orthod 2016;86(3):468–474.

logo

논문 투고
OA 정책