- P-ISSN1229-0076
- E-ISSN2773-9351
- SCOPUS, ESCI
Korean History Education in the United States
Abstract
This article was written as a part of a project to design an introductory Korean history course conducted in English for foreign students. Normally, the lectures would have been tailored to accommodate the students’ background knowledge in Korean history. Because of the diversity of the student population, however, it was difficult to measure their background knowledge in Korean history as a group. Therefore, we decided to focus on the way Korean history is taught in the U.S. public education system. I picked the U.S. since it is the nation where Korean studies is most advanced outside Korea. Since the educational reform of the 1980s, the U.S. education system has emphasized importance of history education. Another part of the reform was the attempt to improve the quality of education by standardizing textbooks and evaluative methods. In addition, the debate on what should be taught in history classes offered by public schools began to attract more attention as the debate on how to structure the standard history textbooks intensified. Putting aside the political agendas, at the center of the debate was the position of European history in world history. In other words, the main disagreement was on whether world history should be centered on European history as it was traditionally done or be restructured to better accommodate the kind of global perspective that springs from cultural relativism. The debate is still alive and will continue to be relevant as research in history continues to advance. Analysis of history education standards for K-12 in three relatively large U.S. states (California, Texas, and Florida) indicates that there is not enough time allocated for world history, with the exception of California. Again with the exception of California, Korean history also takes up only a miniscule part of world history education. As shown in the examples of three U.S. universities with good Korean studies programs (UCLA, Harvard University, Columbia University), education in Korean history in U.S. universities is very much inferior compared with that of Chinese or Japanese history. An exception is UCLA which offers many more classes in Korean studies than others. The courses that they offer also tend to focus on social or cultural history rather than the more traditional forms of courses that focus on political, institutional, or economical history.
- keywords
- world history education, Korean history, education reform, standards-based education, Korea-related courses
참고문헌
Adams, Thomas. 2000. Miguk kelifoniaju yoksa-sahoegwahak gyoyuk gwajeongwi gujo mik hakmunjeok naeyonggijun sokwi Asia (Structure of the History-Social Science Framework and Asia in its content standards). Yoksa Gyoyuk 75:207-215.
Ankeney, Kirk. 2000. Miguk nae hanguk gyoyuke deahan jeonmang (The prospect of Korean studies education in the United States). Yoksa Gyoyuk 75:168-173.
Baker, Don. 2005. Needed: A cultural history of modern Korea. In Current trends and future objectives of Korean studies, 3-9. Proceedings of the International Forum on Korean Studies. International Center for Korea Studies and Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University. Seoul: Korea University.
Bradley Commission on History in Schools. 1989. Building a history curriculum: Guidelines for teaching history in schools. History Teacher 23(1): 7- 35.
Burstein, Stanley M. 2004. History in the age of standards. Social Studies Review 43:5-7.
California State Board of Education. 1998. History-Social Science Content Standards for California Public schools. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/histsocscistnd.pdf.
Center for Korean Research. Korean Studies at Columbia. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ckr/koreanstudies.html.
Choi, Jeonghee. 2007. Miguk junggodeunghakgyo segyesa gyogwaseowi hangukgwanryeon naeyong bunseok (Analysis of Korea-related narratives in the world history textbooks used in U.S. middle and high schools). Academy of Korean Studies. Unpublished.
Columbia College. 2009a. Columbia College Bulletin 2009-2010. http://www.college.columbia.edu/bulletin.
Columbia College. 2009b. Major Cultures Approved Course List 2009-2010. http://www.college.columbia.edu/sites/college/files/Major%20Cultures%20Approved%20Course%20List%202009-2010.pdf.
Columbia College. 2010. The Core Curriculum. http://www.college.columbia.edu/core/.
Columbia University Registrar, 2010. Columbia University Directory of Classes. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/bulletin/uwb/.
Duncan, John. 2003. Summary report on the UCLA Korean studies program. http://www.kf.or.kr/.
Gluck, Carol. 1994. Dialogue: History according to whom? Let the debate continue. New York Times, November 19, p.23.
Florida Department of Education. 2008. Next Generation Sunshine State Standards for Social Studies. http://www.floridastandards.org/downloads.aspx.
Haboush, JaHyun Kim. 2003. Korean studies at Columbia: History and future vision. http://www.kf.or.kr/.
Haboush, JaHyun Kim. 2006. Challenges and strategies of Korean studies of arts and sciences in North America. In International Korean Studies Encyclopedia, 300-307. Seoul: Korea Foundation.
Han, Shinil, Youngsin Kwon, and Jungheun Joo. 2003. Migukdaehakwi gyoyanggwajeong bibyo bunseok (Comparative analysis of general education of America’s top ten national universities 2002). Bigyo Gyoyuk Yeongu 13 (1): 91-119.
Harvard University. 2008. Introduction to the core curriculum. http://my. harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=core&pageid=icb.page43827.
Harvard University. Harvard University Course Catalog. http://coursecatalog. harvard.edu/icb/icb.do.
Harvard University FAS Registrar’s Office. 2009. Handbook for Students 2009-2010. Massachusetts: The Office of the Dean of Harvard College. http://webdocs.registrar.fas.harvard.edu/ugrad_handbook/current/ugrad_handbook_single.pdf.
History-Social Science Curriculum Framework and Criteria Committee. 1988. History-social science framework for California public school: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
History-Social Science Curriculum Framework and Criteria Committee. 2005. History-social science framework for California public school: Kindergarten through grade twelve. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/documents/histsocsciframe.pdf.
Jackson, Kenneth T. 1989. The Bradley commission on history in schools: a retrospective view. History Teacher 23 (1): 73-78.
Kang, Sunjoo. 2004. Migukwi segyesa gyeogwaseo naeyoung bunseok (Three world history textbooks: central themes and organization). Sahoigwa Gyoyuk 43 (2): 137-166.
Kang, Sunjoo, and Sanhoon Choi. 2005. Miguk segyesa gyeogwaseoe natanan nanguk (Korea in world history textbooks widely adopted in the United States). Hanguk Yeoksa Gyoyuk Yeongu 1:1-39.
Kang, Sunjoo. 2007. Migukwi yeosagyoyuk yeongu hyenhwang (Recent research on history teaching and learning in the United States). Yeosa Gyoyuk Ronjib 38:151-189.
Kim, Jeom Sook. 2006. Haebang ihu miguk jishikinwi hanguk insik (Understanding of Korea after its independence in U.S. scholarship: Centering on Far Eastern Quarterly, Far Eastern Survey, Pacific Affairs). Yeoksawa Hyeonsil 58:149-181.
Kim, Jongho. 2004. Miguk sahoigwa gyoyukwi choigwen donghang (A study on the contemporary trend of social studies education in the U.S.A.). Hanguk Chodeung Gyoyuk 48:131-151.
Korea Foundation. The Current Status of Korean Studies Worldwide. http: //www.clickkorea.org/koreanstudies/.
Korea Institute, Harvard University. http://korea.fas.harvard.edu/about-korea-institute-harvard-university.
Lee, Kilsang, and Jeonghee Choi. 2006. Miguk sahoigwa gyogwaseowi hangukgwanryeon naeyong bunseok (Analysis of Korea-related narratives in social studies textbooks published in the United States). Academy of Korean Studies. Unpublished.
National Center for History in the Schools. 1996. National Standards for History Basic Edition. http://nchs.ucla.edu/standards/.
National Center for History in the Schools. 2010a. About the National Standards for History. http://nchs.ucla.edu/ standards.html.
National Center for History in the Schools. 2010b. What is the National Center for History in the Schools? http:// nchs.ucla.edu/about-catalog.html.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington D.C: U.S. Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html.
Official Registrar of Harvard University. 2009. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Courses of Instruction, 2009-2010. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ ~korea/courses/fas.html.
Office of the FAS Registrar. 2009. Handbook for Students 2009-2010. http://webdocs.registrar.fas.harvard.edu/ugrad_handbook/current/ugrad_handbook_single.pdf.
Patrick, John J. 1989. The Bradley Commission in the Context of 1980s Curriculum Reform in the Social Studies. History Teacher 23 (1): 37-48.
Peterson, Mark. 2008. Miguki bon hanguk: gyogwaseoe natanan ganguk (American perceptions of Korea: How Korea appears in U.S. textbooks). In Hangukeul Baraboneun Tajawi Sigak (Overseas perspectives toward Korea), 157-162. Seongnam: Academy of Korean Studies.
Peterson, Mark. 2009. Korean Studies in America. Korean Studies in the World: Present and Future, 69-78. International Conference Proceedings held 2009 by the Academy of Korean Studies, Seongnam: Academy of Korean Studies.
Symcox, Linda. 2002. Whose History? The Struggle for National Standards in American Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Texas Education Agency. 2000. Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Social Studies. http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter113/index.html.
UCLA Center for Korean Studies. Center Mission. http://international.ucla.edu/korea/mission.asp.
UCLA Registrar’s Office. 2009. College of Letters and Science General Education Requirements. http://www.registrar.ucla.edu/ge/GE-LSFr 09-10.pdf.
UCLA Registrar’s Office. Schedule of Classes. http://www.registrar.ucla.edu/schedule/schedulehome.aspx.
U.S. Department of Education. 1994. Progress of Education in the United States of America―1990 through 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education. 2008. A Nation Accountable: Twenty-five Years After A Nation at Risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/accountable/.
Zilversmit, Arthur. 1989. The Bradley Commission and American history. The History Teacher 23 (1): 49-51.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수