Because they combine the two contradictory spheres called history and drama, the potential for debate is inherent in the historical dramas aired on TV. This study divides the fictionalization process through which a historical fact is rewritten as a drama into three tasks: ‘filling in spaces,’ ‘omission of historical facts,’ and the ‘modification of historical facts.’ The task of ‘filling in the spaces’ refers to the filling in of the empty spaces inherent in historical records with stories created based on the imagination of the writer. The ‘omission of historical facts’ refers to the act of omitting events and characters recorded in historical documents from a drama. The ‘modification of historical facts’ revolves around the changing of the temporal order, roles of characters, and relationship between facts in a manner that departs from what is found in the historical records. The plot is then used to comprehensively reorganize these three fictionalization methods. The analysis of Queen Seondeok based on these four factors revealed that this drama in fact incorporates complex and conflicting elements. Various events occur within the basic narrative structure that revolves around the conflict between Deokman, who represents the royal authority, and Misil, who stands as the symbol of the aristocracy. The drama exhibits a combination of two different plots: comedy and tragedy. The story of how Deokman is abandoned by the royal family only to return to Silla and ascend to the throne after having overcome Misil constitutes the ascending plot (of comedy). However, Deokman’s choice of the great causes of establishing the royal authority and unifying the three kingdoms actually pushes her to pursue austere discipline in her personal life. This helps to create the atmosphere of anguish and loss found in descending (tragic) plots. In turn, paradigmatic elements are established through a combination of reality and the ideal. As a result, the drama Queen Seondeok features the amalgamation of the small anguished modern ego and the ancient hero who pursues a big dream. To this end, the formulation of the past found in the historical drama Queen Seondeok can be regarded as an imaginary memory that reflects the desires of modern people.
Chung, Yeon-sik. 2009. Making Queen Seondeok’s Images. Hanguksa yeongu 147.
Ju, Bo-don. 2010. Hanguk godae sahoe sok yeoseongui jiwi (Woman’s status in ancient Korean society). Gyemyeong sahak 21.
Joo, Chang-Yun. 2004. The Formation of Historical Drama and Genre Blending. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 48-1.
Kim, Byeong-gon. 2009. Jinpyeongwangui jeukwiwa jijeungwanggye inmului donghyang (The enthronement of King Jinpyeong and the trends related to figures from the King Jijeung line). Hanguk godaesa yeongu 56.
Kim, Eung-Jong. 2011. The Concept of ‘Memory’ in Les Lieux de Mémoire by Pierre Nora. France sa yeongu (Journal of French History) 24.
Kim, Jong-seong. 2009. Reading History through Historical Drama. OhmyNews. June9 – December 28.
Kim, Seon-ju. 2009. Seondeok yeowangui jeukwi baegyeonggwa tongchijeok teukjing (The background of Queen Seondeok’s enthronement and the characteristics of her rule). Journal of Feminism 9.
Kim, Yeong-mok. 2003. Gieokgwa manggak saiui yeoksa dramawa gwageo guseong (Historical drama between memory and oblivion and the composition of the past). Choe, Mun-gyu. 2003. Gieokgwa manggak (Memory and Oblivion). Seoul: Chaeksesang Publishing.
Lee, Deok-il. 2001. Charari gongsang drama rago hara (Call it a fantasy drama). Magazine Mal 186.
Lee, Do-heum. 2000. The Aspects and Meaning of Shillarian world-view and loving. Gukje eomun 22.
Lee, Sang-gon. 2009. Heojunui seuseungeun yu uitaega anida (Yu Uitae is not Heo Jun’s master). Pressian July 29.
Lee, Jeong-suk. 2005. Junggogi sillaui jungang jeongchi chejewa gweollyeok gujo (The Silla central political system and power structure during the mid-ancient era). Silla munhwa 25.
Oh, Yoon-Ah. 2010. A Study on the Assistant Groups and the Meaning in a Drama Series <Queen Seondeok>. Master’s thesis. Graduate School of Education, Dankook University.
Park, Gwang-yong. 1989. TV sageuke munje itda (Issues related to the historical dramas aired on TV). Yeoksa bipyeong 8.
Park, Min-Ja. 2010. High School Students’ Acceptance and Modification of Historical Information through Historical Dramas. Master’s thesis. Graduate School of Education, Pusan National University.
Sohn, Byung Woo. 2007. Media Culture Critique. CNU Press.
Zoh, Borami. 2009. A Study on the Tension between Historical Fact and Imagination in Oh Taeseok’s Historical Drama. Hanguk hyeondae munhak yeongu. 28.
Eco, U. 1984 Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Southampton: Camelot Press.
Lowenthal, D. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Translated by Kim, Jong-won and Han, Myeong-suk. 2006. Gwageoneun natseon narada. Seoul: Gaema Gowon.
Paget, D. 2004. Codes and Convention of Dramadoc and Docudrama in R.C. Allen and A. Hill(eds) The Television Studies Reader. London: Routledge.
Riessman, C.K. 1993. Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Rhodes, G.D. and J.P. Springer (eds). 2006. Docufictions: Essays on the Intersection of Documentary and the Fictional Filmmaking. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Scholles, R. and R., Kellogg. 1966. The Nature of Narrative. Translated by Lim, Byeong-gwon. 2001. Seosaui bonjil. Seoul: Yerim Gihoek.
Williams, R. 1961(1984). The Long Revolution. Pelican Books.