바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2765-6934

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.6 No.4
Citation Share

The Determinants of Human Resource Information System Success in Japanese Manufacturing Companies

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2016, v.6 no.4, pp.27-34
MdLazim Mohd Zin (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
Hadziroh Ibrahim (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
Zuraidah Hassan (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
MdLazim, M. Z. , Hadziroh, I. , & Zuraidah, H. (2016). The Determinants of Human Resource Information System Success in Japanese Manufacturing Companies. Asian Journal of Business Environment, 6(4), 27-34.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Purpose - The study sought to examine the relationship between individual characteristics and system features and Human Resource Information System (HRIS) success in Japanese manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Research Design, Data, and Methodology – This study adopt quantitative approach to investigate the relationship between individual characteristics and system features and HRIS. Toward this objective, a total of 700 questionnaires were mailed to a representative of the organization. A total of 187 questionnaires were returned, and only 145 were usable for further analysis, representing a response rate of 20.71%. Result - Results indicated that individual characteristics and two dimensions of system characteristics (ease of use and training) were significantly related to HRIS success. Unexpectedly, the results showed that the third dimension of system features (documentation) was unrelated to HRIS success. Conclusions - The results partially support the underlying arguments that individual characteristics and system characteristics have significant influences on HRIS success. The finding suggests that HRIS success in the organization can be generated as a result of good implementation of system support and employees’ readiness to apply HRIS in their jobs.

keywords
Human Resource Information System (HRIS), Ease of Use, Training, Documentation, Computer Understanding.

Reference

1.

Ball, K. (2001). The use of human resource information Systems: A survey. Personnel Review, 30(6), 677-693.

2.

Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29, 530-545.

3.

Bondarouk, T. V., & Ruel, H. J. M. (2008). HRM systems for successful information technology implementation: evidence from three case studies. European Management Journal, 26, 153-165.

4.

Broderick, R., & Boudreau, J. W. (1992). Human resource management, information technology, and the competitive edge. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 7-17.

5.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.

6.

Davis, K. A., & Songer, A. D. (2009). Resistance to IT change in the AEC Industry: Are the stereotypes true? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 135(12), 1324-1333.

7.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-90.

8.

Doll, W. J., & Ahmed, M. U. (1985). Documenting information systems for management: A key to maintaining user satisfaction. Information & Management, 8, 221-226.

9.

Foong, S. Y. (1999). Effect of end-user personal and systems attributes on computer-based information system success in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 81-87.

10.

Fuerst, W. L., & Cheney, P. H. (1982). Factors affecting the perceived utilization of computer-based decision support systems in the oil industry. Decision Sciences. 13(4), 554-569.

11.

Gemoets, L. A., & Mahmood, M. A. (1990). Effect of the quality of user documentation on user satisfaction with information systems. Information and Management. 18, 47-54.

12.

Gupta, A., & Saxena, S. (2010). Assessing employees perception regarding EHRM in service organisations. Management Insight, 7(2), 1-21

13.

Haines, V., & Petit, A. (1997). Conditions for successful human resource information systems. Human Resource Management, 36(2), 261-275.

14.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Resarch method for business. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

15.

Hosnavi, R., & Ramezan, M. (2010). Measuring the effectiveness of a human resource information system in National Irani Oil Company: An empirical assessment. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(1), 28-39.

16.

Huo, Y. P., & Kearns, J. (1992). Optimizing the job person match with computerized human resource information systems. Personnel Review, 21(2), 3 18

17.

Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984). User involvement and MIS Success: A review of research. Management Science, 30(5), 586-603.

18.

Jurizan, A. (2002). A study on factors influencing the successful implementation of a HRIS. Working Paper, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

19.

Kovach, K. A., & Cathcart, C. E. (1999). Human resource information systems: Providing business with rapid data access, information exchange and strategic advantage. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 275-282.

20.

Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., & Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 237-256.

21.

Mohd, Y., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Factors influencing attitude towards using electronic HRM. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2ndICBER2011), 1510-1520.

22.

Mohd, Y., Ramayah, T., & Ibrahim, H. (2010). E-HRM: A proposed model based on technology acceptance model. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 3309-3045.

23.

Mohamed S., Suraya M., & Zainal A., (1999). Factors contributing to the success of HRIS in malaysian manufacturing firms. Paper presented at School of Management, UniversitiSains Malaysia.

24.

Norazuwa, M., Daratul Ambia, C. M., &Ruslan, R. (2000). The implementaion of HRIS in Malaysia. Paper presented at School of Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia.

25.

Raymond, L. (1988). The impact of computer training on the attitudes and usage behavior of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management. 26(3), 8-13.

26.

Rezaei, A., Asadi, A., Rezvanfar, A., & Hassanshahi, H. (2009). The impact of organizational factors on management information system success: An investigation in the Iran’s agricultural extension providers. The International Information & Library Review, 41, 163-172.

27.

Sanayei, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2008). Designing a model for evaluating the effectiveness of E_HRM (Case study : Iranian Organizations). International Journal of Information Science and Technology. 6(2), 79-98.

28.

Seddon, P. B., & Kiew, M. Y. (1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada (ICIS 94), pp.99-110.

29.

Tannenbaum, S. I. (1990). Human resource information systems: User group implications. Journal of Systems Management, 41(1), 27-32, 36.

30.

Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review. 44, 57-65.

31.

Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.

32.

Zmud, R. W. (1979). Individual differences and MIS success: Are view of the empirical success. Management Science, 25(10), 966-979.

Asian Journal of Business Environment

e-Submission OA Policy