Integrating Interest, Aptitude, Personality, and Work Value for Career Coaching

탁진국

doi:10.51457/kjcp.2017.06.1.1.27

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30

사전등록 바로가기

오늘 하루 그만보기

권한신청
ENGLISH
P-ISSN2586-0755
E-ISSN2799-8444
KCI

홈으로

전체 논문 목록

논문 상세

Home > 논문 상세

P-ISSN 2586-0755
E-ISSN 2799-8444

논문 투고

1권 1호

Citation Share

흥미, 적성, 성격 및 직업가치를 통합한 커리어코칭

Integrating Interest, Aptitude, Personality, and Work Value for Career Coaching

한국심리학회지: 코칭 / KOREAN JOURNAL OF COACHING PSYCHOLOGY, (P)2586-0755; (E)2799-8444

2017, v.1 no.1, pp.27-45

https://doi.org/10.51457/kjcp.2017.06.1.1.27

탁진국 (광운대학교)

탁진국. (2017). 흥미, 적성, 성격 및 직업가치를 통합한 커리어코칭. 한국심리학회지: 코칭, 1(1), 27-45, https://doi.org/10.51457/kjcp.2017.06.1.1.27

복사

다운로드 수
조회수

PDF 다운로드

초록

본 논문은 피코치의 다양한 심리특성(흥미, 적성, 성격, 및 직업가치)을 측정한 뒤 각 검사에서 나타난 결과들을 통합하여 피코치에게 가장 적합한 진로나 직업 정보를 제공하는 방법을제시하는 데 목적이 있다. 다양한 특성 가운데 가장 기본이 되는 흥미검사 결과를 토대로매 단계마다 적성검사, 성격검사, 그리고 직업가치 검사 결과를 차례대로 통합하여 최종적으로 개인에게 적합한 직업정보를 제공하는 방법에 대해 설명하고 이에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords: 커리어코칭, 흥미, 적성, 성격, 직업가치, 통합

Abstract

This research was intended to propose a career coaching technique which integrates results of assessments of interest, aptitude, personality, and work value. Previous studies on relationships among these four traits were reviewed. Then the integration procedures of the results of the assessments of each of these traits were proposed and discussed.

keywords: Career coaching, Interest, Aptitude, Personality, Work value, Integration

참고문헌

박 경, 강문희 (2000). MBTI 성격유형과 Holland의 직업적 유형과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료. 12, 109-125.

박동건, 김성훈, 허영운 (1999). Holland 흥미모형과 5요인 성격 모형간의 관계에 대한 경험적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 12, 95-112.

안창규 (1996). 진로 및 적성 탐색검사의 해석과 활동. 한국가이던스.

조지연 (2012). 긍정심리기반 강점중심 코칭프로그램이 대학생들의 자기효능감, 진로의사결정 및 진로결정수준에 미치는 영향. 광운대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

탁진국 (2003). 직업안내를 위한 흥미와 성격의 통합: Strong 흥미검사와 MBTI를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16, 59-74.

탁진국, 정 현 (2004). 직업흥미와 가치와의 관계. 디지털경영연구, 10, 291-303. 광운대학교디지털경영연구소.

Ackerman, P. L. (2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence:gf/gc, personality and interest correlates. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55B(2), 69-84.

Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2002). Intelligence personality, and interests in the career choice process. Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 205-218.

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1977). Intelligence, personality, and interests:Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.

ACT (1999). Research support for DISCOVER assessment components. Iowa City, IA: Author.

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analyses of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland's occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45-74.

Busch, J. C. (1995). Review of the Strong Interest Inventory, Fourth edition. In J. C. Conoley &J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 997-999). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological measurement, 62, 590-602.

Carless, S. A. (1999). Career assessment: Holland's vocational interests, personality characteristics, and abilities. Journal of Career Assessment, 7, 125-144.

Crites, J. O. (1981). Career counseling: Models, methods, and materials. McGraw-Hill.

Dillon, M., & Weissman, S. (1987). Relationship between personality types on the Strong-Campbell and Myers-Briggs Instruments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 68-79.

Downes, M., & Kroeck, K. G. (1996). Discrepancies between existing jobs and individual interests: An empirical application of Holland's model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 107-117.

Gati, I., Fassa, N., & Mayer, Y. (1998). An aspect-based approach to person-environment fit: A comparison between the aspect of structure derived from characteristics of occupation and that derived from counselees'preferences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 28-43.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.

Graff, R. W., Larrimore, M., Whitehead, G. I., & Hopson, N. W. (1991). Career counseling practices: A survey of college/university counseling centers. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

Hammer, A. L., & Kummerow, J. M. (2001). Strong and MBTI: Career development guide. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Strong Interest Inventory:Applications and technical guide. Stanford, CA:Stanford Univ. Press.

Harvey, R. J. (1996). Reliability and validity. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (pp. 5-29). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NF:Prentice-Hall.

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices (3rd ed.). odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Katz, L., Joyner, J. W., & Seaman, N. (1999). Effects of joint interpretation of the Strong Interest Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in career choice. Journal of Career Assessment, 7, 281-297.

Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analysis of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217-239.

Littman-Ovaldia, H., Lazar-Butbul, V., & Benjamin, B. A. (2014). Strength-based career counseling: Overview and intial evaluation. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(3), 403-419.

Lofquist, L. H., & Dawis, R. V. (1991). Essentials of person-environment correspondence counseling. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lowman, R. L. (1991). The clinical practice of career assessment: Interests, abilities, and personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual:A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.

Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1989). Manual:A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologist Press.

Nevill, D. D., & Kruse, S. J. (1996). Career assessment and the values scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 383-397.

Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.

Prediger, D. J. (2002). Abilities, interests, and values: their assessment and their integration via the World-of-Work map. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 209-232.

Prediger, D. J., Swaney, K., & Mau, W-C. (1993). Extending Holland's hexagon: Procedures, counseling applications, and research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 422-428.

Provost, J. A., & Anchors, S. (1988). Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in higher education. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Rounds, J. B. (1990). The comparative and combined utility of work value and interest data in career counseling with adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 32-45.

Rounds, J. B., Jr., Henly, G. A., Dawis, R. V., Lofquist, L. H, & Weiss, D. J. (1981). Manual for the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire: A measure of needs and values. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN: Vocational Psychology Research.

Sample, J. A., & Hoffman, J. L. (1986). The MBTI as a management and organizational development tool. Journal of Psychological Type, 11, 47-50.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the structure and content of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL:Academic Press.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.

Soh, S., & Leong, F. T. L. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of Holland's theory in Singapore:Beyond structural validity of RIASEC. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 115-133.

Super, D. E (1995). Values: Their nature, assessment, and practical use. In D. E. Super and B. Sverko (Eds.), Life roles, values, and careers: International findings of the Work Importance Study (pp. 54-61). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

Swaney, K. B (1995). Technical manual: Revised unisex edition of the ACT interest inventory(UNIACT). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.

Swaney, K., & Prediger, D. J. (1985). The relationship between interest-occupation congruence and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 13-24.

Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1986). Construct validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 174-195.

Tischler, L. (1994). The MBTI factor structure. Journal of Psychological Type, 31, 24-31.

Tokar, D. M., & Swanson, J. L. (1995). Evaluation of the correspondence between Holand's vocational personality typology and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 89-108.

Tracey, T. J. G., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Correspondence of interest and abilities with occupational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 178-189.

Watkins, C. E., Jr., Campbell, C. L., & Nieberding, R. (1994). The practice of vocational assessment by counseling psychologists. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 115-128.

Worthen, B. R. (1995). Review of the Strong Interest Inventory, Fourth edition. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 999-1002). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.