바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia / Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, (E)2383-9449
2014, v.13 no.1, pp.69-81
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2014.13.1.069
Jung, Kyujin
No, Won
Kim, Ji Won
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

While much in the field of public management has emphasized the importance of nonprofit advocacy activities in policy and decision-making procedures, few have considered the relevance and impact of leading actors on structuring diverse patterns of information sharing and communication through social media. Building nonprofit advocacy is a complicated process for a single organization to undertake, but social media applications such as Facebook and Twitter have facilitated nonprofit organizations and stakeholders to effectively share information and communicate with each other for identifying their mission as it relates to environmental issues. By analyzing the Australian Marine Conservation Society's (AMCS) Twitter network data from the period 1 April to 20 April, 2013, this research discovered diverse patterns in nonprofit advocacy by leading actors in building advocacy. Based on the webometrics approach, analysis results show that nonprofit advocacy through social media is structured by dynamic information flows and intercommunications among participants and followers of the AMCS. Also, the findings indicate that the news media and international and domestic nonprofit organizations have a leading role in building nonprofit advocacy by clustering with their followers.

keywords
Nonprofit Advocacy Leader, Social Media Use, Great Barrier Reef, Australian Marine Conservation Society

Reference

1.

Australian Marine Conservation Society. Australian marine conservation society annual report 2010.

2.

Australian Marine Conservation Society. About us and our work.

3.

Bird, D., Ling, M. & Haynes, K.. (2011). Flooding Facebook: the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 27-33.

4.

Boris, E. T., edited by Elizabeth Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle. Nonprofit orgniazations in a democarcy-roles and responsibilities. In Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict.

5.

Boris, E. T. & Krehely, J., edited by Lester A. Salamon. Civic participation and advocacy. In State of Nonprofit America.

6.

Boris, E. T. & Mosher-Williams, R.. (1998). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Assessing the definitions, classification, and data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 488. 10.1177/0899764098274006.

7.

Borgatti, S., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L.. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.

8.

Borgatti, S.. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55-71. 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008.

9.

Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T.. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317-319. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002.

10.

Bresciani, S. & Schmeil, A.. Social media platforms for social good.

11.

Burby, R. J., Deyle, R. E., Godschalk, D. R., & Olshansky, R. B. (2000). Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 99-106. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99).

12.

Burt, R. S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition.

13.

Douvere, F. & Badman, T. MISSION REPORT Reactive monitoring mission to Great Bbarrier Reef (Australia) 6th to 14th March 2012 Saint Petersburg.

14.

Burt, R. S.. Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital.

15.

Ciszek, E.. (2013). Advocacy and amplification: Nonprofit outreach and empowerment through participatory media. Public Relations Journal, 7(2), 187-213.

16.

Chun, A. & Reyes, L. F. L.. (2012). Social media in government. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 441-445. 10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.003.

17.

Finn, P. G., Udy, N. S., Baltais, S. J., Price, K., & Coles, L.. (2010). Assessing the quality of seagrass data collected by community volunteers in Moreton Bay Marine Park, Australia. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 83-89. 10.1017/S0376892910000251.

18.

Golbeck, J., Grimes, J., & Rogers, A.. (2010). Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1612-1621.

19.

Green, S. J., White, A. T., Christie, P., Kilarski, S., Meneses, A. T., Samonte-Tan, G., ... & Claussen, J. D.. (2011). Emerging marine protected area networks in the Coral Triangle: Lessons and way forward. Conservation and Society, 9(3), 173. 10.4103/0972-4923.86986.

20.

Greenberg, J., & MacAulay, M.. (2009). NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition, 2, 63-88.

21.

Greenpeace. Boom Goes the Reef: Australia's coal export boom and the industrialisation of the Great Barrier Reef.

22.

Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A.. Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world.

23.

Khan, G. F. & Park, H. W.. (2013). The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 182-193. 10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.003.

24.

Hopkins, B. R.. Charity, advocacy, and the law.

25.

Hopley, D., Smithers, S. G., & Parnell, K. E.. The geomorphology of the Great Barrier Reef: development, diversity and change.

26.

Hsu, C. & Park, H. W. (2012). apping online social networks of Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 169-181. 10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.009.

27.

Leroux, K. & Goerdel, H. (2009). Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic management explanation. Public Performance and Management Review, 32(4), 514-536. 10.2753/PMR1530-9576320402.

28.

Lin, N.. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action.

29.

Littman, R., Willis, B. L., & Bourne, D. G.. (2011). Metagenomic analysis of the coral holobiont during a natural bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 3(6), 651-660. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00234.x.

30.

Lovejoy, K. & Saxton, G. D.. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 337-353. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x.

31.

Mejias, U.. (2011). The twitter revolution must die. International Journal of Learning and Media, 2(4), 3-5.

32.

Mertig,A. G., Riley, E. D., & Denton, E. M., edited by Riley E.. The environmental movement in the United States, In Handbook of Environmental Sociology;Dunlap and William Michelson.

33.

O'Reilly, R.. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns of business models for the next generation of sofeware. Communication and Strategies, 1, 17.

34.

Nah, S. & Saxton, G. D.. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294-313. 10.1177/1461444812452411.

35.

Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning provides. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 5-21. 10.1177/0899764006291778.

36.

Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150. 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6.

37.

Pinho, J. C. & Macedo, I. M.. (2006). The Benefits and Barriers Associated with the Use of the Internet Within the Non-Profit Sector. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 16(1), 171-193. 10.1300/J054v16n01_09.

38.

Pope, J. A., Isely, E.S., & Asamoa-Tutu, F. (2009). Developing a Marketing Strategy for Nonprofit Organizations: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 21(2), 184-201. 10.1080/10495140802529532.

39.

Randolph, J.. Environmental Land Use Planning and Management.

40.

Reid, E. J., 2nd ed.. Advocacy and the challenges it presents for nonprofits. In Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict.

41.

Rothwell, D. & Stephens, T.. Global climate change, the Great Barrier Reef and our obligations. On Line Opinion.

42.

Smith, M. A., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Rodrigues, E. M., Barash, V., Dunne, C., & Gleave, E.. (2010). Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL . Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies.

43.

Shih, C. The Facebook era: Tapping online social networks to market, sell and innovate.

44.

Scott, J.. Social Network Analysis: A handbook.

45.

Solis, B. & Breakenridge, D.. Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR.

46.

The International Ecotourism Society. Queensland's Draft Ecotourism Plan Now Open for Public Comment.

47.

The State Government of Queensland. Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2013-2020.

48.

Townsend, K.. Project Manta.

49.

United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Great Barrier Reef - UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

50.

Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications.

51.

Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J.. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102-106. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia