Triple Helix and the Circle of Innovation
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
This paper positions the triple-Helix as a meso-level notion, an epicycle in a grander circle of technological change, institutional change, and psychological change. Because of the differing speeds of these several kinds of change, speed is proposed as a high-level system metric. This implies that what we commonly call bridging agencies or facilitators - lawyers, venture capitalists, incubators, etc. - are better called buffering agencies, as they help to engage entities changing at different speeds. They use human judgment as well as information technologies to choose feasible timing for these engagements. The paper highlights implications for thinking about innovation diffusion: The grand cycle of socio-technical change means we should, rather, think in terms of innovation reinforcement, or a circle of innovation.
- keywords
- Triple-Helix, Knowledge-based economic development, Innovation, Social Change
참고문헌
H. Aldrich. Organizations Evolving.
Jose Alberto Sampaio Aranha, D.S. Oh & F. Phillips (Eds). Arrangement of Actors in the Triple Helix Innovation;Technopolis: Best Practices for Science and Technology Cities.
Jonathan Bard, Boaz Golany and Fred Phillips. (1999). Bubble Planning and the Mathematics of Con-sortia . Third International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation.
Frank Bass. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215-227. 10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215.
A. Charnes, S. Littlechild and S. Sorensen. (1973). Core-stem Solutions of N-person Essential Games. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., I, 649-660.
W.W. Cooper, D.V. Gibson, F. Phillips, S. Thore and A. Whinston (eds). IMPACT: How <TEX>$IC^2$</TEX> Research Affects Public Policy and Business Markets.
Wilfred Dolfsma, Loet Leydesdorff. (2009). Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(7), 932-941. 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.02.004.
Larry Downes and Paul Nunes. The Faster a New Technology Takes Off, the Harder It Falls.
Raghu K. Ganti, Fan Ye, and Hui Lei. Mobile Crowdsensing: Current State and Future Chal-lenges.
Dion Hinchcliffe. Does technology improve employee engagement?, Enterprise Web 2.0.
F. Phillips. (2007). On S-curves and Tipping Points. Tech. Forecasting & Social Change, 74(6), 715-730. 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.11.006.
Inga A. Ivanova, Loet Leydesdorff. Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations.
Loet Leydesdorff & Henry Etzkowitz. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Science and Public Policy, 23, 279-286.
H. Linstone and F. Phillips. (2013). The Simultaneous Localization-Globalization Impact ofInfor-mation/Communication Technology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80, 1438-1443. 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.011.
F. Phillips. (2011). The state of technological and social change: Impressions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(6), 1072-1078. 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.020.
F. Phillips, S. Alarakhia and P. Limprayoon, D.S. Oh & F. Phillips (Eds). The Triple Helix: International Cases and Critical Summary;Technopolis: Best Practices for Science and Technology Cities.
K. Prager, H. Posthumus, Napier TL.. Socio-economic factors influencing farmers' adoption of soil conservation practices in Europe;Human dimensions of Soil and Water Conservation.
David Sasaki. Beyond Technology for Transparency.
Alan M. Turing. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, 327, 37-72.
David Watson. .
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수