바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

Shapiro, Matthew A.(Department of Social Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology) ; Brunner, Elizabeth(Department of Communication, Media, & Persuasion, Idaho State University) ; Li, Hui() pp.147-175 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.147
초록보기
초록

Abstract

Under authoritarian regimes, citizen-led NGOs such as environmental NGOs (ENGOs) often operate under close scrutiny of the government. While this presents a challenge to a single ENGO, we propose here - in line with existing research on network effects - that there are opportunities for multiple ENGOs to coordinate and thus work in ways that supersede government controls, affect public opinion, and contribute to policy revision and/or creation. In this paper, we specifically examine the possibility that the gamut of citizen-based ENGOs in China are coordinating. Based on network analysis of ENGOs web pages as well as interviews with more than a dozen ENGO leaders between 2014 and 2016, we find that ENGOs have few direct and public connections to each other, but social media sites and personal connections offline provide a crucial function in creating bridges. A closer examination of these bridges reveals, however, that they can be substantive to the environmental discussion or functional to the dissemination of web page information but typically not both. In short, ENGOs in China are not directly connected but rather are connected in a way that responds to the available social media and the government's censorship practices.

Lee, Junku(University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences) ; Tkach-Kawasaki, Leslie(University of Tsukuba, Faculty of School of Humanities and Social Sciences) pp.176-198 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.176
초록보기
초록

Abstract

Environmental issues are among the most critical issues nowadays. These issues are no longer confined to individual countries, and international society has been progressing in building global dialogues since the early 1970s. Within these international efforts, Germany and Japan have played essential roles in global environmental governance. However, there are major differences in nation-level environmental policies in both countries. Governance based on network structure is more efficient than that based on hierarchy for solving complex problems. The network structure is formed through horizontal cooperation among various autonomous actors, and the relationship intensity among actors is one of the key concepts in the governance. Using social network analysis as a framework to explain complicated societal structures explains how interaction among actors creates networks, and these networks further affect their interactions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the structure of environmental policy governance as collaborative governance in Germany and Japan. To address this goal, this paper analyzes the relationship between the informational dimension of governance networks and its complement resource-sharing networks in both countries. The results show that the information-sharing networks have lower-level network influence on the resource-sharing networks as higher-level networks even if not all of the information factors have singular influences. The results suggest that the information-sharing networks may be one of the pieces of the puzzle for explaining this phenomenon in environmental governance in Germany and Japan.

Sharif, Naubahar(Division of Social Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) ; Ritter, Waltraut(Knowledge Dialogues, Hong Kong SAR, Open Data Hong Kong) ; Davidson, Robert L(Open Data Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, TwoCloaks Ltd) ; Edmunds, Scott C(Open Data Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, GigaScience, BGI HK Limited) pp.200-221 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.200
초록보기
초록

Abstract

Open Science is an umbrella term that involves various movements aiming to remove the barriers to sharing any kind of output, resources, methods or tools at any stage of the research process. While the study of open science is relatively advanced in Western countries, we know of no scholarship that attempts to understand open science in Hong Kong. This paper provides a broad-based background on the major research data management organisations, policies and institutions with the intention of laying a foundation for more rigorous future research that quantifies the benefits of open access and open data policies. We explore the status and prospects for open science (open access and open data) in the context of Hong Kong and how open science can contribute to innovation in Hong Kong. Surveying Hong Kong's policies and players, we identify both lost research potential and provide positive examples of Hong Kong's contribution to scientific research. Finally, we offer suggestions regarding what changes can be made to address the gaps we identify.

Haruki, Wada(Emeritus of the Institute of Social Science, Tokyo University) pp.222-228 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.222
Novikova, Natalia(Tamagawa University) pp.229-233 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.229
Valero, Jesus N.(Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, The University of Utah) pp.234-236 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.234
Li, Jiang(Nanjing University, Zhejiang University) ; Xu, Weiai Wayne(UMass-Amherst) ; Wang, Fang(Nanjing University) ; Chen, Si(Nanjing University) ; Sun, Jianjun(Nanjing University) pp.237-253 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2018.17.2.237
초록보기
초록

Abstract

In order to understand China's internet governance, this paper examined 1,931 Internet policies of China by bibliometric techniques. Specifically, the bibliometric techniques include simple document counting, co-word analysis, collaboration network analysis and citation analysis. The findings include: (1) China's Internet legislations mainly emphasized e-commerce and Internet governance, and, to some extent, neglected personal data protection; (2) China's Internet is under intensive multiple regulatory controls by central government. A large number of government agencies are involved in Internet policy-making. The Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Information Leading Group of the State Council, enforced fewer policy documents, but occupy higher positions in the Internet governance hierarchy; (3) China's Internet legislation system is primarily composed of industry-specific administrative rules, rather than laws or administrative regulations. Nevertheless, laws and administrative regulations received significantly more citations owing to their superior force. This paper also discussed current gaps in China's internet governance and how the country's internet policies are situated in the broader global context.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia