open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Condylar fractures account for one-third of all mandibular fractures. There are many surgical methods for the open reduction of condylar fractures, such as the transoral, submandibular, preauricular, and retromandibular approaches. Two patients suffering from condylar fractures, a 45-year-old man and a 25-year-old man, were admitted to our hospital. Both patients’ condylar fractures were positioned too high for us to use the transoral approach. Therefore, we employed the retromandibular method to expedite the approach to the fracture site and minimize the size of the incision. After the surgical procedures in both cases, we experienced complications in the form of parotid gland fistulae, which rarely result from the retromandibular approach. A combination of botulinum toxin injection and amitriptyline medication was effective for the management of these parotid gland fistulae. Here, we report these two cases and offer a review of the literature on this article.
1. Sawazaki R, Lima Ju′nior SM, Asprino L et al :Incidence and patterns of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:1252-1259.
2. Chossegros C, Cheynet F, Blanc JL, et al : Short retromandibular approach of subcondylar fractures :Clinical and radiologic long-term evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 82:248-252.
3. Haug RH, Assael LA : Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59:370-375.
4. Brandt MT, Haug RH : Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61:1324-1332.
5. Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL et al : Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation of fractures of the mandibular condylar process: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study with special evaluation of fracture level. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:2537-2544.
6. Andersson J, Hallmer F, Eriksson L : Unilateral mandibular condylar fractures: a 31-year follow-up of non-surgical treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36:310-314.
7. Valiati R, Ibrahim D, Abreu MER et al : The treatment of condylar fractures: to open or not to open? A critical review of this controversy. Int J Med Sci 2008; 5:313-318.
8. Vesnaver A : Open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular fractures of the mandibular condyle:our first experiences. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:2123-2129.
9. Pilling E, Schneider M, Mai R et al : Minimally invasive fracture treatment with cannulated lag screws in intracapsular fractures of the condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 868-872.
10. He D, Yang C, Chen M et al : Intracapsular condylar fracture of the mandible: our classification and open treatment experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:1672-1679.
11. Tang W, Gao C, Long J et al : Application of modified retromandibular approach indirectly from the anterior edge of the parotid gland in the surgical treatment of condylar fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:552-558.
12. Kim B, Cha Y, Lim J, et al : Open reduction of mandibular condylar fracture via preauricular approach. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 32(6):521-528.
13. Bhagol A, Singh V and Singhal R: Management of mandibular fractures, INTECH 2013; 385-414.
14. Kshirsagar R, Singh V, Pawar S et al :Retromandibular approach in the management of condylar fractures by open reduction and internal fixation a prospective study. National J of Maxillofacial Surgery 2015; 6(2):180-184.
15. Bindra S, Choudhary K, Sharma P. et al :Management of mandibular sub condylar and condylar fractures using retromandibular approach and assessment of associated surgical complications. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2010; 9:355-362.
16. Lee SC, Kim TG, Ryu DM et al : A clinical and statistical study of condylar fracture of mandible. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 24:326-329.
17. Doo HT, Lee H. et al : Three cases of surgical repair of traumatic parotid duct injury. Korean J of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2011; 54(1):77-80.
18. Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Murakami K, Sugimura M : A comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis with lag screws, miniplates, or Kirschner wires for mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59:1161-1168.
19. Van Sickels JE : Management of parotid gland and duct injuries. Oral Maxillofac Surg Ckin North Am 2009; 21(2):243-246.
20. Lakshmi B, Chandra U, Shruthi S : Evaluation of anticholinergic property of amitriptyline and promethazine on salivary flow secretion in normal healthy human volunteers. Indo American J of Pham Research 2016; 6:3934-3940.
21. Beerens AJ, Snow GB : Botulium toxin A in the treatment of patients with Frey syndrome. Br J Surg 2002; 89(1):116-119.
22. Shilpa P, Kaul R et al : Botuinum toxin: The midas touch. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2014; 5(1):8-14.
23. Martos P, Bances R, Mancha M et al : Clinical results in the management of Frey’s syndrome with injections of Botulium toxin. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Buccal 2008; 13:248-252.
24. “Product Information. Pamelor (nortriptyline).”Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Crporation, East Hanover, NJ.
25. Rossi S, ed. eAMH [online]. Adelaide: Australian Medicines Handbook, 2012. www.amh.net.au.
26. Pathak S, Gupta R : Botulinum toxin: from a deadly toxin to a useful drug. J MGIMS 2009; 14:10-17.