open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Objectives: This preliminary study compared the effects of glide path establishing instruments prior to substantial root canal preparation. Materials and Methods: Glide path was established by enlargement of the 2nd mesiobuccal root canal of Dentalike by using three kinds of glide path preparation nickel-titanium file; PathFile, One G and ProGlider. The pre- and post-instrumented Dentalikes were weighed in the resolution of 1 / 10mg. In addition, after glide path preparation, torque generated during shaping using the WavoOne file was measured. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test at a significance level of 95%. Results: The ProGlider had the significantly larger amount of reduced weight than other instrument groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between group of glide path preparation with ProGlider and without glide path preparation in maximum torque and total stress generation during the shaping with WaveOne. Conclusions: Glide path preparation instruments may have different efficiency according to their geometries. The Dentalike artificial teeth were revealed to have discrepancies in the size of root canals by microCT examination. It is impossible to make a meaningful judgment of the results due to the reliability or resolution problem of the root canal size of the artificial tooth selected as the standardized tooth.
1. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004; 30:432-435.
2. Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickeltitanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009; 35:938-943.
3. Setzer FC, Kwon TK, Karabucak B. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences. J Endod 2010; 36:1226-1229.
4. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 2003; 36:246-255.
5. Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 2011; 37:429-438.
6. Reddy SA, Hicks ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1998; 24:180-183.
7. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000; 26:161-165.
8. Cheung GS. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2009; 16:1-26.
9. Arbab-Chirani R, Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani S, Calloch S. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending behavior through finite-element models of 5Ni-Ti endodontic instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111:115-121.
10. Tsujimoto M, Irifune Y, Tsujimoto Y, Yamada S, Watanabe I, Hayashi Y. Comparison of conventional and new-generation nickel-titanium files in regard to their physical properties. J Endod 2014; 40:1824-1829.
11. Baek SH, Lee CJ, Versluis A, Kim BM, Lee W, Kim HC. Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickeltitanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod 2011; 37:1283-1286.
12. Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012; 37:215-219.
13. Patino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005; 31:114-116.
14. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Chiandussi G, Pera F, Migliaretti G, Pasqualini D. Use of nickeltitanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path:comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009; 35:408-412.
15. Kwak SW, Ha JH, Lee CJ, El Abed R, Abu-Tahun IH, Kim HC. Effects of Pitch Length and Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of the Glide Path Preparation Instruments. J Endod 2016; 42:788-792.
16. Ha JH, Kim SK, Kwak SW, El Aded R, Bae YC, Kim HC. Debris extrusion by glide-path establishing endodontic instruments with different geometries. J Dent Sci 2016; 11:136-140.
17. Topcuoglu HS, Düzgün S, Akpek F, Top?uo?lu G, Aktı A. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals. Int Endod J 2016; 49:599-603.
18. Borges AH, Pereira TM, Porto AN, de Araujo Estrela CR, Miranda Pedro FL, Aranha AM, Guedes OA. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems. J Endod 2016; 42:465-469.
19. Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2014; 47:211-221.
20. Berutti E, Alovisi M, Pastorelli MA, Chiandussi G, Scotti N, Pasqualini D. Energy consumption of ProTaper Next X1 after glide path with PathFiles and ProGlider. J Endod 2014; 40:2015-2018.
21. Paleker F, van der Vyver PJ. Glide Path Enlargement of Mandibular Molar Canals by Using K-files, the ProGlider File, and G-Files: A Comparative Study of the Preparation Times. J Endod 2017; 43:609-612.
22. D'Amario M, Baldi M, Petricca R, De Angelis F, El Abed R, D'Arcangelo C. Evaluation of a new nickeltitanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals. J Endod 2013; 39:1581-1584.
23. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. J Endod 2014; 40:2053-2056.
24. Ha JH, Jeon HJ, Abed RE, Chang SW, Kim SK, Kim HC. Effect of repetitive pecking at working length for glide path preparation using G-file. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40:123-127.