바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

치과의사 자율규제 논의를 위한 해외 치과의사관리기구 검토

Review of overseas dental regulatory authorities for a discussion on self-regulation of the dentist

Abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the regulation of medical & dental profession in South Korea due to various medical scandals & exacerbated commercialism. Consequently, the voice asking for strengthening the license management of medical & dental profession is rising. However, there is an absolutely lacking discussion on self-regulation of the Korean dentist community. This study investigated International Society of Dental Regulators and dental regulatory authorities in the U.K., Ontario in Canada, California in the U.S. and Australia. In addition, this study examined what situations Japan was in, which was similar to Korea in terms of systems. In the U.K., the U.S., Canada and Australia, there are independent dental regulatory authorities, which place emphasis on lay personnel participation. In addition, the organizations prepared very specific and detailed ethics, standards, and punishment guidelines to be followed by professionals. And, various efforts are being made to secure transparency and trust. As a result of this study, self-regulation in Korea seems to require an open approach that embraces civil society, and it is considered that dentist should lead social discussion more positively.

keywords
self-regulation, dental regulatory authority, Overseas case review

참고문헌

1.

1) 국제의료인관리기구협회 공식 홈페이지(https://www.iamra.com/) 참고

2.

2) 국제치과의료인관리협의회 공식 홈페이지(http://isdronline.org) 참고

3.

3)“ 교정치과 진료사기 논란, 부작용 이슈까지.‘.. 국민적 신뢰회복’어떻게”. 치위협보 2018년 5월 30일자 기사 참고

4.

4) “치협, ‘전문가평가제’시범사업 시행”. 덴탈아리랑 2018년 12월 21일자 기사 참고

5.

5) “영국 사례로 본‘자율규제’이상과 현실”. 건치신문 2017년 12월 11일자 기사 참고

6.

6) 홍순호, 김각균, 서정택, 신제원, 김경년, 박상현, 권재성. 치과의료인 자율규제 및 관리기구 설립에관한 연구. 대한치과의사협의회 치과의료정책연구소 2017

7.

7) 뉴질랜드 치과위원회 홈페이지(www.dcnz.org.nz/resources-and-publications/links/international-dental-regulators-examination-and-accreditaiton-bodies)의 ISDR 설명참고

8.

8) General Dental Council. Annual report and account 2016

9.

9) General Dental Council Homepage (https://www.gdc-uk.org/) 자료 참고

10.

10) 2001 No. 3926. DENTIST. The Dentist Act 1984(Amendment) Order 2001

11.

11) General Dental Council. Continuing Professional Development for dental professionals 2013

12.

12) General Dental Council. Annual report and account 2015

13.

13) General Medical Council. The Good medical practice framework for appraisal and revalidation 2013

14.

14) General Medical Council. Revalidation: a statement of intent. London 2010

15.

15) Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario 홈페이지(www.rcdso.org) 참고

16.

16) Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario. Annual report 2015

17.

17) Professional standards authority (2013). A review conducted for the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario. Professioanl Standards Authority for Health and Social Care

18.

18) Cantelon, L. (2014). A Study of Ethics in the Profession of Dentistry. Athabasca University

19.

19) 캘리포니아 치과면허국 홈페이지(www.dbc.ca.gov), 캘리포니아 소비자보호국(California Department of Consumer Affairs)의 2016년 연례보고서, 캘리포니아 치과면허국 2014년 연말보고서(Sunset)참고

20.

20) Cook R. Dental Dangers: How the Dental Board of California investigates dentists. Center for Health Journalism 2014 July 21

21.

21) Dental Board of Australia, Annual report summary 2016/2017

22.

22) Australian Health Practitionaer Regulation Agency, 2017/2018 Annual report

23.

23) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 - reprinted as in forced on 1 July 2010

24.

24) 医道審議會道分科會. 医師及び齒科?師に医する行政處分の考え方について. 厚生勞働省 2015

25.

25) 樋口範雄. 厚生勞働医 道審議會の組織と機能. 日本師會2012

26.

26) Shaw K, Cassel CK, Black C, Levinson W. Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2009;302(18):2008-2014

logo