open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Dental education is gradually transitioning to competency-based education system, which aims to help dentists achieve certain core competencies by means of various systems, such as curriculum accreditation. This study examined satisfaction with dental school education and the differences in the perceived importance and self-assessment of competencies among general dentists, in an attempt to propose a desirable direction for dental education. A questionnaire was administered to new general dentists who graduated from a dental school within the past 10 years. The results of the survey were analyzed using the Importance-Performance Analysis to understand differences in dentists’ perceptions. Overall satisfaction with education was low in terms of the curriculum’s relevance to actual practice and its capacity for cultivating required competencies. Furthermore, many of the respondents strongly perceived the need to improve dental education. Additional investigations into the satisfaction with education showed no difference. Among the seven key competency domains, dentists perceived Health Promotion to be important and also assessed themselves as having high competence. However, regarding the perceived importance of the remaining domains, self-assessment of competence was low for Professionalism, Communication & Interpersonal Skills, Knowledge Base, Information Handling & Critical Thinking, Clinical Information Gathering, Diagnosis & Treatment Planning, and Establishment & Maintenance of Oral Health. The results of this study suggest that a competency-based education model should be developed and incorporated into dental education to set performance standards and to promote systematic self-assessment in order to foster the development of competence in dental students.
1. McClelland DC. Introduction. In: Spencer LM, Spencer SM, editors. Competence at work. New York, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1993.
2. Frank JR, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, Wang M, De Rossi S, Horsley T. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Med Teacher 2010; 32(8):631-37.
3. International Federation of Dental Educators and Associations; 2017 [updated 131 2017 Feb 6]. At: http://www.ifdea.org/about/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed: October 6, 2017.
4. Commission on Dental Accreditation. Accreditation Standards for Dental Education Program. Commission on Dental Accreditation 2015.
5. General Dental Council. Preparing for practice: dental team learning outcomes for registration. London: The General Dental Council, 2012. At: http://www.gdcuk.org/newsandpublications/publications/publications/gdc%20learning%20outcomes.pdf. Accessed: September 22, 2017.
6. Nine years of Dend Ed - a global perspective on dental education.
7. Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, Vinkka-puhakka H, Walmsley AD. Profile and competences for the graduating European dentist-update 2009. Eur J Dent Educ 2010; 14(4):193-202.
8. Australian Dental Council (ADC). Accreditation Standards for Dental Practitioner Programs. ADC Consultation Paper 2014.
9. Japan University Accreditation Association. University Standards and Explanation. Japan: Japan University Accreditation Association 2011. AT: http://juaa.or.jp/en/accreditation/university.html. Accessed: November 6, 2017.
10. KIDEE. Korean Institute of Dental Education & Evaluation At: http://www.kidee.org/Evaluation/Standard.asp Accessed: June 13, 2017.
11. Yoon BY, Choi IS, Kim SJ, Park HJ, Joo HJ, Lee BD, Lee JT. Suggestions for a successful application of competence-based medical education in Korea. KMER 2015;
12. Chi MT, Glaser R, Farr MJ, editors. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
13. Choi I, Yoon BY. New challenges for Korean medical education: Enhancing students’ abilities to deal with uncertain ill-defined problems. Korean Med Educ Rev 2014; 16(3):111-8.
14. Kim CY, Kim SM, Suh CD, Um YE, Ahn YO, Kim SK, Chae JI, Lee SH. A survey of students’ satisfaction with medical education. Korean J Med Educ 1996; 8(2):169-188.
15. Park JH, Kim WM, Lee WC, Lee YS. A study on the satisfaction of medical licensing examination and the present condition of skill test in medical schools. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2004; 1(1):77-86.
16. Foldevi M. Undergraduate medical students’ rating of clerkship in general practice. Fam Pract 1995; 12(2):207-13.
17. Irby DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995; 70(10):898-931.
18. Martilla J, James J. Importance-performance analysis. J Marketing 1977; 41(1):77-9.
19. Matzler K, Sauerwein E, Heischmidt K. Importance-performance analysis revisited: The role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. Serv Indus J 2003; 23(2):112-9.
20. Bacon D. A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. Int J Market Res 2003; 45(1):55-71.
21. Goldie J. AMEE education guide no. 29: Evaluating educational programmers. Med Teach 2006; 28(3):210-24.
22. Gruppen LD, Burkhardt JC, Fitzgerald JT, Funnell M, Haftel HM, Lypson ML, Mullan PB, Santen SA, Sheets KJ, Stalburg CM, Vasquez JA. Competency-based education: Programme design and challenges to implementation. J Med Educ 2016; 50(5):532-9.
23. Peter Mccrorie & Katharine A. M. Boursicot. Variations in medical school graduating., 2009.
24. McCrorie P, Boursicot KA. Variations in medical school graduating examinations in the United Kingdom: are clinical competence standards comparable? Med Teach 2009; 31(3):223-9.
25. McManus I, Elder AT, De Champlain A, Dacre JE, Mollon J, Chis L. Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP (UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations. BMC Med 2008; 6:5.
26. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77:1121-34.
27. Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell L. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: from programme design to curriculum change. Med Educ 2005; 39(2):127-36.