바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 0376-4672

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

59권 4호

구치부에서 짧은 길이 임플란트의 임상적 효용성에 대한 고찰

Review on the clinical outcomes of short implants in posterior regions

홍지연 (경희대학교)
대한치과의사협회지 / The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, (P)0376-4672; (E)2713-7961
2021, v.59 no.4, pp.240-246
https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2021.59.4.005
홍지연. (2021). 구치부에서 짧은 길이 임플란트의 임상적 효용성에 대한 고찰. 대한치과의사협회지, 59(4), 240-246, https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2021.59.4.005

Abstract

Among the treatment options to overcome the reduced vertical height of atrophied ridges in both posterior maxilla and mandible, short-length implants have been studied for the clinical outcomes compared to the standard-length implants accompanied with advanced surgeries including sinus floor elevation and vertical ridge augmentation. In this paper, biomechanical considerations associated with short implants, clinical studies and results including the survival rates, marginal bone resorption and complications were reviewed as well as the treatment guidelines for the resorbed maxilla and mandible.

keywords
short dental implant, sinus floor elevation, vertical augmentation, survival rates

참고문헌

1.

1. Boioli, LT, Penaud, J, Miller N. A meta-analytic, quantitative assessment of osseointegration establishment and evolution of submerged and non-submerged endosseous titanium oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(6):579–588.

2.

2. Milinkovic I, Cordaro L. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43(5):606-625.

3.

3. Sanz M, Vignoletti F. Key aspects on the use of bone substitutes for bone regeneration of edentulous ridges. Dent Mater 2015;31(6):640-647.

4.

4. Raghoebar GM, Meijndert L, Kalk WW, Vissink A. Morbidity of mandibular bone harvesting: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(3):359-365.

5.

5. Del Fabbro M, Wallace SS, Testori T. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(6):773-783.

6.

6. Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46Suppl(21):307-318.

7.

7. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl(2): 35-51.

8.

8. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontol 2000 2014;66(1):72-96.

9.

9. Ante IH. The fundamental principles of abutments. Mich State Dent Soc Bullet 1926;8:14-23.

10.

10. Lulic M, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Salvi GE. ‘Ante’ (1926)law revisited: a systematic review on survival rates and complications of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) on severely reduced periodontal tissue support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18Suppl(3):63-72.

11.

11. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98(1):1-5.

12.

12. Schneider D, Witt L, Hämmerle CH. Influence of the crown-toimplant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(2):169-174.

13.

13. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(1):20-25.

14.

14. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implantsupported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillfac Implants 1998;13(2):204-211.

15.

15. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20(2):220-230.

16.

16. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(7):667-676.

17.

17. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (≤ 10 mm)dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(4):816-825.

18.

18. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26Suppl(11):154-169.

19.

19. Nisand D, Picard N, Rocchietta I. Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 Suppl(11):170-179.

20.

20. Pistilli R, Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Piatelli M, Corvino V, Barausse C, Buti J, Soardi E, Esposito M. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2013;6(4):359-72.

21.

21. Esposito M, Pistilli R, Barausse C, Felice P. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7(4):383-95.

22.

22. Thoma DS, Haas R, Sporniak-Tutak K, Garcia A, Taylor TD, Hämmerle CHF. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45(12):1465-1474.

23.

23. Guljé FL, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)2019;12(3):315-326.

24.

24. Esposito M, Cannizarro G, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone? Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4(4):301-11.

25.

25. Felice P, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: result at 8 years after loading from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2018;11(4):385-395.

26.

26. Thoma DS, Cha JK, Jung UW. Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: short implants versus long implants in augmented bone. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47(1):2-12.

27.

27. Schwartz SR. Short implants: are they a viable option in implant dentistry? Dent Clin North Am 2015;59(2):317-28.

logo

논문 투고
OA 정책