바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

성공적인 골재생유도술을 위한 고려사항

Considerations for successful Guided Bone Regeneration

Abstract

The advancement of guided bone regeneration (GBR), which restores various types of bone defects faster and more safely, broadens the implant indications and opens up many possibilities. However, planning sufficient regeneration in severe vertical and horizontal bone defects, especially in periodontally compromised patients, is not easy. For the successful guided bone regeneration procedure, the clinician must carefully analyze the form of bone destruction in three dimensions and strictly select the appropriate membrane and bone graft material accordingly. In addition, key factors for GBR success such as blood supply, graft material and membrane stability, and primary closure should always be considered. Soft-tissue management and optimized flap design, various membrane fixation techniques seem to be another important factor for long-term success.

keywords
guided bone regeneration, alveolar bone loss, ridge augmentation

참고문헌

1.

1. Benic GI, Hammerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:13-40.

2.

2. Hammerle CH, Schmid J, Lang NP, Olah AJ. Temporal dynamics of healing in rabbit cranial defects using guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:167-174.

3.

3. Retzepi M, Donos N. Guided Bone Regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:567-576.

4.

4. Cucchi A, Chierico A, Fontana F, et al. Statements and Recommendations for Guided Bone Regeneration: Consensus Report of the Guided Bone Regeneration Symposium Held in Bologna, October 15 to 16, 2016. Implant Dent 2019;28:388-399.

5.

5. Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2006;15:8-17.

6.

6. Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Nyengaard JR, Karring T. Fate of bone formed by guided tissue regeneration with or without grafting of Bio-Oss or Biogran. An experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:30-39.

7.

7. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, Dahlin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:13-29.

8.

8. Yamada Y, Tamura T, Hariu K, Asano Y, Sato S, Ito K. Angiogenesis in newly augmented bone observed in rabbit calvarium using a titanium cap. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1003-1009.

9.

9. Bornstein MM, Halbritter S, Harnisch H, Weber HP, Buser D. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1109-1116.

10.

10. Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:1048-1058.

11.

11. Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1983;4:437-453.

12.

12. Allen EP, Gainza CS, Farthing GG, Newbold DA. Improved technique for localized ridge augmentation. A report of 21 cases. J Periodontol 1985;56:195-199.

13.

13. Wang HL, Al-Shammari K. HVC ridge deficiency classification: a therapeutically oriented classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:335-343.

14.

14. Won JY, Park CY, Bae JH, et al. Evaluation of 3D printed PCL/PLGA/beta-TCP versus collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in a beagle implant model. Biomed Mater 2016;11:055013.

15.

15. Petre A, Balta C, Herman H, et al. A novel experimental approach to evaluate guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the rat femur using a 3D-printed CAD/CAM zirconia space-maintaining barrier. J Adv Res 2021;28:221-229.

16.

16. Winet H. The role of microvasculature in normal and perturbed bone healing as revealed by intravital microscopy. Bone 1996;19:39S57S.

17.

17. Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:10-29.

18.

18. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D. The role of bone decortication in enhancing the results of guided bone regeneration:a literature review. J Periodontol 2009;80:175-189.

19.

19. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:433-440.

20.

20. Yang C, Unursaikhan O, Lee JS, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH. Osteoconductivity and biodegradation of synthetic bone substitutes with different tricalcium phosphate contents in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102:80-88.

21.

21. Cordaro L, Bosshardt DD, Palattella P, Rao W, Serino G, Chiapasco M. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:796-803.

22.

22. Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:961-970.

23.

23. Lee JS, Cha JK, Thoma DS, Jung UW. Report of a human autopsy case in maxillary sinuses augmented using a synthetic bone substitute: Micro-computed tomographic and histologic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:339-345.

24.

24. Omar O, Elgali I, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect? J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:103-123.

25.

25. Elgali I, Turri A, Xia W, et al. Guided bone regeneration using resorbable membrane and different bone substitutes: Early histological and molecular events. Acta Biomater 2016;29:409-423.

26.

26. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering AH. Periimplant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:9-18.

27.

27. Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2013;84:1755-1767.

28.

28. Giannobile WV, Jung RE, Schwarz F, Groups of the 2nd Osteology Foundation Consensus M. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 15:7-10.

29.

29. Cho YD, Ku Y. Guided bone regeneration using K-incision technique. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2018;48:193-200.

30.

30. Lee C, Kim S, Kim J, Namgung D, Kim K, Ku Y. Supplemental periodontal regeneration by vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants. A preclinical in vivo experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:1118-1125.

logo