open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Dental implants that restore lost teeth are no longer a difficult choice. In past years, osseointegration and mar ginal bone level stability were regarded as success criteria. However, clinicians and patients consider aesthetic requirements a critical success factor. Therefore, the review of literatures and cases was conducted from a surgi cal point of view when placing implants for the long-term results with desired requirements. The author demonstrated that 1) appropriate 3D implant placement position (vertical position of depth and distance considering the attachment level of adjacent teeth; horizontal position considering the outer edge of the jaw bone), 2) appropriate bone width around the implant and surrounding gingiva (buccal bone, keratinized gingiva, thickness above the implant, vestibular depth) area needed for esthetic and functional implants.
1. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Journal of dental research. 2012 Mar;91(3):242-8.
2. Su CY, Fu JH, Wang HL. The role of implant position on long-term success. Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2014Aug;4(3):187-93.
3. Sanz-Martín I, Regidor E, Navarro J, Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz M, Ortiz-Vigón A. Factors associated with the presence of periimplant buccal soft tissue dehiscences: A case-control study. Journal of Periodontology. 2020 Aug;91(8):1003-10.
4. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Clinical classification of bone defects concerning the placement of dental implants. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2003 Apr 1;23(2):147-56.
5. Funato A, Salama MA, Ishikawa T, Garber DA, Salama H. Timing, positioning, and sequential staging in esthetic implant therapy:a four-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2007 Aug 1;27(4).
6. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52.
7. Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets:an experimental study in dogs. Clinical oral implants research. 2006 Aug;17(4):351-8.
8. Schropp L, Isidor F. Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008 Jan;35:33-43.
9. Ryser MR, Block MS, Mercante DE. Correlation of papilla to crestal bone levels around single tooth implants in immediate or delayed crown protocols. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2005 Aug 1;63(8):1184-95.
10. Buser D, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Frei M, Belser UC. Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5-to 9-year follow-up. Journal of periodontology. 2013 Nov;84(11):1517-27.
11. Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla—a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan 1;29(Suppl):186-215.
12. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?. Periodontology 2000. 2017Feb;73(1):84-102.
13. Avila-Ortiz G, Gonzalez-Martin O, Couso-Queiruga E, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype.J Periodontol 2020Mar;91(3):283-288.
14. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations:a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2009Sep;20:113-23.
15. Schneider D, Grunder U, Ender A, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE. Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. Clinical oral implants research. 2011Jan;22(1):28-37.
16. Jung RE, Herzog M, Wolleb K, Ramel CF, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing. Clinical oral implants research. 2017 Mar;28(3):348-54.