ISSN : 0376-4672
Alveolar ridge preservation was introduced many years ago however, the concept is not widely accepted among the patients as well as the clinicians. Recently, the author has newly proposed the terminology of 'imme diate guided bone regeneration, iGBR' and the relocated clinical knowhow and iGBR has received lots of inter est since then. The clinicians should choose the indication for iGBR carefully, and the selection of biomaterials, compression knowhow, the application of polydeoxyribonucleotide, and the suture technique, Hidden X should be also considered. Especially, the open healing concept using collagen 3D matrix can produce wide zone of keratinized tissue by secondary healing and it may prevent the future peri-implantitis. In conclusion, iGBR is a patient and clinician friendly technique with lots of advantages in terms of hard and soft tissue.
1. Avila-Ortiz, G., Chambrone, L. and Vignoletti, F. (2019) ‘Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction:A systematic review and meta-analysis’, Journal of clinical periodontology, 46 Suppl 21, pp. 195–223.
2. Barber, H.D. et al. (2007) ‘Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration’, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 65(4), pp. 748–752.
3. Barboza, E.P. et al. (2014) ‘Evaluation of a dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane to increase keratinized tissue: a randomized controlled clinical trial’, Implant dentistry, 23(3), pp. 289–294.
4. Barootchi, S. et al. (2022) ‘Alveolar ridge preservation: Complications and cost-effectiveness’, Periodontology 2000 [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12469.
5. Bitto, A. et al. (2013) ‘Adenosine receptor stimulation by polynucleotides (PDRN) reduces inflammation in experimental periodontitis’, Journal of clinical periodontology, 40(1), pp. 26–32.
6. Cha, J.-K. et al. (2019) ‘Alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior maxilla reduces vertical dimensional change: A randomized controlled clinical trial’, Clinical oral implants research, 30(6), pp. 515–523.
7. Choi, H.-K. et al. (2017) ‘Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes’, Journal of periodontal & implant science, 47(6), pp. 372–380.
8. Cho, I.-W., Park, J.-C. and Shin, H.-S. (2017) ‘A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preservation’, Journal of periodontal & implant science, 47(1), pp. 51–63.
9. Delgado-Ruiz, R. et al. (2018) ‘Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation:animal study’, Clinical oral implants research, 29(7), pp. 792–801.
10. Engler-Hamm, D. et al. (2011) ‘Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial’, Journal of periodontology, 82(3), pp. 377–387.
11. Hämmerle, C.H.F. et al. (2012) ‘Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets’, Clinical oral implants research, 23 Suppl 5, pp. 80–82.
12. Hoffmann, O. et al. (2008) ‘Alveolar bone preservation in extraction sockets using non-resorbable dPTFE membranes: a retrospective non-randomized study’, Journal of periodontology, 79(8), pp. 1355–1369.
13. Kim, Y.-J. et al. (2014) ‘Ridge preservation using demineralized bone matrix gel with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial’, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 72(7), pp. 1281–1290.
14. Lee, D. et al. (2023) ‘The impact of polydeoxyribonucleotide on early bone formation in lateral-window sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement’, Journal of periodontal &implant science, 53(2), pp. 157–169.
15. Lee, S.-J. et al. (2020) ‘Histological comparison of different compressive forces on particulate grafts during alveolar ridge preservation: a prospective proof-of-concept study’, Journal of periodontal & implant science, 50(3), pp. 197–206.
16. Mardas, N. et al. (2015) ‘Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods’, Clinical oral implants research, 26 Suppl 11, pp. 180–201.
17. Park, J.-C., Koo, K.-T. and Lim, H.-C. (2016) ‘The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation’, Journal of periodontal & implant science, 46(6), pp. 415–425.
18. Romanos, G.E. et al. (2018) ‘Role of mechanical compression on bone regeneration around a particulate bone graft material:an experimental study in rabbit calvaria’, Clinical oral implants research, 29(6), pp. 612–619.
19. Schropp, L. et al. (2003) ‘Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study’, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 23(4), pp. 313–323.
20. Tan, W.L. et al. (2012) ‘A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans’, Clinical oral implants research, 23 Suppl 5, pp. 1–21.
21. Wang, H.-L. and Boyapati, L. (2006) ‘“PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration’, Implant dentistry, 15(1), pp. 8–17.
