바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

실내 굴진 시험을 통한 폼 주입 조건에 따른 인공 사질토 지반에서 EPB TBM 굴진성능에 대한 고찰

Study on EPB TBM performance by conducting lab-scaled excavation tests with different foam injection for artificial sand

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2019, v.21 no.4, pp.545-560
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.4.545
이효범 (고려대학교)
신다한
김대영 (현대건설(주) 기술연구소)
신영진 (현대건설)
최항석 (고려대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

During EPB TBM tunnelling, an appropriate application of additives such as foam and polymer is an essential factor to secure the stability of TBM as well as tunnelling performance. From the ’90s, there have been many studies on the optimal injection of additives worldwidely contrary to the domestic situation. Therefore, in this paper, the foam, which is widely adopted for soil conditioning, was selected as an additive in order to investigate the effect of foam injection on TBM performance through a series of laboratory excavation tests. The excavation experiments were carried out on artificial sandy soil specimens with consideration of the variance of FIR (Foam Injection Ratio), FER (Foam Expansion Ratio) and Cf (Surfactant Concentration), which indicate the amount and quality of the foam. During the tests, torque values were measured, and the workability of conditioned soil was evaluated by comparing the slump values of muck after each experiment. In addition, a weight loss of the replaceable aluminum cutter bits installed on the blade was measured to estimate the degree of abrasion. Finally, the foam injection ratio for the optimal TBM excavation for the typical soil specimen was determined by comparing the measured torque, slump value and abrasion. Note that the foam injection conditions satisfying the appropriate level of machine load, mechanical wear and workability are essential in the EPB TBM operational design.

keywords
EPB TBM, 굴진 성능, 쏘일 컨디셔닝, 폼, 실내시험, EPB TBM, TBM performance, Soil conditioning, Foam, Laboratory test

참고문헌

1.

1. ASTM (2015). ASTM C143, Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete, C143/C143M15a, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.

2.

2. Budach, C. (2012), Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckshilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein, Ph.D. Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, pp. 174-180.

3.

3. Budach, C., Thewes, M. (2015), “Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 50, pp. 296-304.

4.

4. EFNARC, A. (2005). Specifications and Guidelines for the use of specialist products for Mechanized Tunnelling (TBM) in Soft Ground and Hard Rock. Recommendation of European Federation of Producers and Contractors of Specialist Products for Structures.

5.

5. Gharahbagh, E.A., Rostami, J., Palomino, A.M. (2011), “New soil abrasion testing method for soft ground tunneling applications”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 604-613.

6.

6. Gharahbagh, E.A., Rostami, J., Talebi, K. (2014), “Experimental study of the effect of conditioning on abrasive wear and torque requirement of full face tunneling machines”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 41, pp. 127-136.

7.

7. Hedayatzadeh, M., Rostami, J., Peila, D., Forough, O., Salazar, C.G.O. (2017), “Development of a soil abrasion test and analysis of impact of soil conditioning on tool wear for soft ground mechanized tunneling using EPB machines”, Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2017, Bergen, pp. 1-6.

8.

8. Herrenknecht, M., Thewes, M., Budach, C. (2011), “The development of earth pressure shields: from the beginning to the present/Entwicklung der Erddruckschilde: Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart”Geomechanics and Tunnelling, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 11-35.

9.

9. Jakobsen, P.D., Bruland, A., Dahl, F. (2013a), “Review and assessment of the NTNU/SINTEF Soil Abrasion Test (SAT™) for determination of abrasiveness of soil and soft ground”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 37, pp. 107-114.

10.

10. Jakobsen, P.D., Langmaack, L., Dahl, F., Breivik, T. (2013b), “Development of the Soft Ground Abrasion Tester (SGAT) to predict TBM tool wear, torque and thrust”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 398-408.

11.

11. Kim, D.Y., Kang, H.B., Shin, Y.J., Jung, J.H., Lee, J.W. (2018a), “Development of testing apparatus and fundamental study for performance and cutting tool wear of EPB TBM in soft ground”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 453-467.

12.

12. Kim, T.H.., Kwon, Y.S., Chung, H., Lee, I.M. (2018b), “A simple test method to evaluate workability of conditioned soil used for EPB Shield TBM” Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 1049-1060.

13.

13. Langmaack, L. (2000), “Advanced technology of soil conditioning in EPB shield tunneling”, Proceedings of North American Tunneling Congress 2000, Boston, pp. 525-542.

14.

14. Lee, H., Shin, D., Kim, D.Y., Shin, Y.J., Choi, H. (2019), “Prediction of EPB shield TBM performance using a lab scale excavation test with different soil conditions”, Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Concgress 2019, Naples, pp. 2446-2454.

15.

15. Maidl, U. (1995), Erweiterung der Einsatzbereiche der Erddruckschilde durch bodenkonditionierung mit Schaum, Ph.D. Thesis, Institut für Konstruktiven Ingenieurbau, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, pp. 1-184.

16.

16. Mori, L. (2016), Advancing understanding of the relationship between soil conditioning and earth pressure balance tunnel boring machine chamber and shield annulus behavior, Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, pp. 1-191.

17.

17. Mori, L., Alavi, E., Mooney, M. (2017), “Apparent density evaluation methods to assess the effectiveness of soil conditioning”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 67, pp. 175-186.

18.

18. Mori, L., Mooney, M., Cha, M. (2018), “Characterizing the influence of stress on foam conditioned sand for EPB tunneling”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 71, pp. 454-465.

19.

19. Peila, D., Oggeri, C., Borio, L. (2009), “Using the slump test to assess the behavior of conditioned soil for EPB tunneling”, Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 167-174.

20.

20. Psomas, S. (2001), Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunnelling applications, Master Thesis, England:St Hugh’s College, University of Oxford, pp. 1-147.

21.

21. Quebaud, S., Sibai, M., Henry, J.P. (1998), “Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 173-180.

22.

22. Rostami, J., Gharahbagh, E.A., Palomino, A.M., Mosleh, M. (2012), “Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 28, pp. 245-256.

23.

23. Salazar, C.G.O., Todaro, C., Bosio, F., Bassini, E., Ugues, D., Peila, D. (2018), “A new test device for the study of metal wear in conditioned granular soil used in EPB shield tunneling”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 73, pp. 212-221.

24.

24. Vinai, R., Oggeri, C., Peila, D. (2008), “Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: A laboratory research”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 308-317.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회