오픈액세스 학술지는 무료로 원문에 접근할 수 있다는 특성을 부각시키면서 학술 연구자들이 학술정보를 찾는 주요 정보서비스로 자리를 잡아가고 있다. 그러나 최근 들어 정보환경이 변화하면서 오픈액세스 학술지 서비스의 실효성을 확보하기 위해서 서비스의 개선과 확장에 대한 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 이 연구에서는 이와 같은 환경적 변화를 반영하여 차세대 오픈액세스 학술지 서비스에 대한 방안을 기존 학술정보서비스의 서비스 요소를 분석하여 도출하고자 하였다. 분석결과 기존 학술정보서비스에서는 이용자의 참여를 유도하는 서비스가 부족한 것으로 나타났고 개방성 역시 미흡한 것으로 나타났다. 오픈액세스 차세대 모형을 위해 제시된 요소는 총 4개 영역으로 학술논문 구성 요소별 제공 및 멀티미디어 제공, 부가 정보 검색, 개방형 학술정보 공유 서비스, 모바일 서비스 등이다.
Open access journal has been one of the major academic information sources for researchers characterizing itself as free resource. Recently, as competition among academic information service provides becomes intense, open access journal also needs to enhance its service and expand information service function. This study aims to propose service features for next generation service of open access journals by analyzing service features of leading journal database services. As a result, four service features are suggested such as journal article components and multimedia features, expanded searching features, social service features and mobile information service.
Altaman, K.. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater citaion impact. College and Research Libraries, 65(5), 372-382.
Davis, Philip. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337, a568-.
Frandsen, Tover Faber. (2009). The effect of open access on un-publishing documents: A case study of economics working papers. Journal of Informatrics, (3), 124-133.
Guest editorial. (2008). Expanding the value of scholarly, open access e-journals. Library and Information Science Research, 30, 237-241.
Hajjem, C.. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comaprison of the growth of open access and how it increase research citation impact. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 28(4), 39-47.
Kostoff, R. N.. (1988). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation: Commnets on the theories of citation?. Scientometrics, 43, 27-43.
Latronico, N.. (2008). Who cares for citation advantage? Rapid response to Davis, P., Lewenstein, B., Simon, D., Booth, J., & Connolly, M.(2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337, a568-.
MacRoberts, M. H.. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
Mukherajee, Bhaskar. (2009). The hyperlinking pattern of open-access journals in library and information science: A cited citing reference study. Library & Information Science Research, 31, 113-125.
Massie, B. M.. (2002). What is the significance of a journal's impact factor?. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 8, 363-364.
Olle, Candela. (2010). A quality study of the impact of electronic journals on scholarly information behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 32, 221-228.
Olson, J. E.. (2005). Top 25 business school professors rate journals in operations management and related fields. Interface, 35(4), 323-338.
Tenopir, C.. (2001). Electronic journals: How user behaviour is changing. In Online Information 2001 (75-181). Proceedings of the International Online Information Meeting.
Tenopir, C.. (2008). Electronic journals and changing in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. D-Lib Magazine, 14(11), -.