바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • E-ISSN2383-9449
  • SCOPUS

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia / Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, (E)2383-9449
2014, v.13 no.1, pp.39-55
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2014.13.1.039
Rho, Wha-Joon

Abstract

This study aims to examine and develop a Triple Helix model for social innovation to eradicate pervasive poverty in developing countries. To do this, this study explores and analyzes the Rural Saemaul Undong (RSU), a rural community development movement for eradicating poverty that was driven by the South Korean government during the 1970s. First of all, this study explores the characteristics of the RSU and explains why the RSU was a social innovation. To support and explain why the RSU was a successful social innovation, this study analyzes the roles and activities of three distinct actor groups: the chief policymaker and his aides who presented the vision and purpose, or the "why" of the Saemaul Undong; central and local government officials who were the planners and managers who showed "how" to plan and drive it; and village Saemaul leaders as the drivers and coaches showing rural villagers "what" to do. Based on this analysis, this study develops an actor-based Triple Helix model for social innovation to eradicate poverty.

keywords
Rural Saemaul Undong, Triple Helix, social innovation, eradicating poverty, Golden Circle

Reference

1.

Agricultural Cooperative Association. Agricultural Yearbook.

2.

Choi, Sang-Ho. (1977). The Background of Saemaul Leaders and the Motive of Their Roles. Korean Journal of Agricultural Education Society, 7(1), 78-96.

3.

Eom, Seok-Jin. (2011). The Rural Saemaul Undong Revisited from the Perspective of Good Governance. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(2), 17-43.

4.

Eom, Seok-Jin. (2011). Synergy Between State and Rural Society for Development: An Analysis of the Governance System of the Rural Saemaul Undong in Korea. Korean Observer, 42(4), 583-620.

5.

Eom, Seok-Jin. (2011). Between Mobilization and participation: A study on the roles of public officials in local administrations during the rural Saemaul Undong in the 1970s. Korean Public Administration Review, 45(3), 97-122.

6.

Eoyang, G.. Conditions for Self-organizing in Human Systems.

7.

Fukuyama, Francis. Social Capital and Civil Society.

8.

Funnell, Sue C. and Rogers, Patricia J.. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models.

9.

Goh, Kun. (2010). Saemaul (New Village) Undong in Korea (29-47). Saemaul Undong 40th Anniversary International Symposium.

10.

Goldstein, Jeffrey, Hazy, James K. and Benyamin B. Lichtenstein. Complexity and the Nexus of Leadership.

11.

Fonseca, Jose. Complexity and Innovation in Organization.

12.

Hwang, Y.. (2006). Reexamination of Rural Saemaul Undong. Research on Agricultural History, 5(2), 17-53.

13.

Han, Do-Hyun, Research Institute of Korean Spiritual Culture (ed.). Structural Changes of the Rural Society during the 1960s;Research on Social Change During the 1960s: 1963-1970.

14.

Han, Do-Hyun. The World Experienced by the Male Saemaul Leaders During the Saemaul Undong processes, Vol. 88.

15.

Hayden, F. Gregory. Policymaking for a Good Society: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach to Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation.

16.

Hazy, James K., Jeffrey Goldstein, and Benyamin B. Lichtenstein. Complex Systems Leadership Theory.

17.

Kim, Hae-Dong et.al. An Evaluation and Field Experimentation of Saemaul Movement in the Republic of Korea.

18.

Hong, In-Geun. (1965). People's Movement for National Reconstruction. Shin Dong-A, 10(2), 154-169.

19.

Im, Tobin. (2013). How Did the Saemaul Movement Succeed: Strategic Analysis Point of View. Journal of The Saemaul Undong & Community Development, 9, 73-105.

20.

Jun, Sang-In. (2010). Direct View and Re-recognition of Saemaul Undong . Review of the 40 year history and Future Perspective of Saemaul Undong in the 21st century, SMU 40th Anniversary International Symposium.

21.

Kim, Young-Pyoung. (2013). Korean Saemaul Undong and Its Implications for the Rural Development of Emerging Countries. Journal of Saemaul Undong & Community Development, 9, 37-72.

22.

Ministry of Home Affairs. History of Saemaul Undong: 1971-1980.

23.

Oh, Ryue-Suck, et al. Graphical Representation of Saemaul Undong System.

24.

Oh, Ryue-Suck, et al. Collections of Saemaul Statistics.

25.

Park, Chung-hee. Saemaul: Korea's New Community Movement.

26.

Park, Gil-Sung, Park, Gil-Sung, Kang Myung-Gu, Han Do-Hyun, Kang Sang-Hyun & Hong Seuk-Ryule (eds.). Demographic and Social Change in 1960s and Urbanization;The Study of the Social Change in 1960s: 1963-1970.

27.

Rho, Wha-Joon. (2013). The Role of Saemaul Leader as the social innovator. Journal of The Saemaul Undong & community Development, 9, 1-35.

28.

Park, Jin-Whan. The Ignition Process of the Saemaul Undong: Ideology and Practice of the Saemaul Undong (in Korean).

29.

Rho, Yukyeong. A Study on Coaching Leadership and Emergence of Innovative Behavior in Saemaul Undong.

30.

Rho, Wha-Joon. Saemaul Undong of Korea: Generative Leadership and Emergence of the Social Value.

31.

Ryu, Byeung-Ryeong, Choi Bong-Dae & Oh Ryu-Suck. Strategies for Modernization and Saemaul Undong.

32.

Sinek, Simon. Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action.

33.

So, Jin-Kwang. (2007). Local governance and Saemaul Undong in Korea. Korean Journal of Local Autonomy, 19(3), 93-176.

34.

United Nations. The Millennium Development Goal Report 2012.

35.

Whang, In-jung. Integrative rural development in Korea: Evaluation and prospect of Saemaul Undong.

36.

Whang, In-Jung. (1983). Innovations in local administration for rural development in Korea. Journal of East and West Studies, 12(2), 1-22. 10.1080/12265088308422695.

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia