바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 0376-4672

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

61권 7호

광경화성 액상수지경화방식 이용한 치과용 3D 프린터 종류와 특성

Introduction to photopolymerization-based dental 3D printers

문원준 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과생체재료과학교실)
Enshi Jiang (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과생체재료과학교실)
최유경 (독립연구자)
임범순 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과생체재료과학교실)
정신혜 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과생체재료과학교실)
대한치과의사협회지 / The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, (P)0376-4672; (E)2713-7961
2023, v.61 no.7, pp.470-478
https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2023.61.7.003
문원준, Enshi, J. , 최유경, 임범순, & 정신혜. (2023). 광경화성 액상수지경화방식 이용한 치과용 3D 프린터 종류와 특성. 대한치과의사협회지, 61(7), 470-478, https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2023.61.7.003

Abstract

3D printing is an additive manufacturing technique with popularity in dental fields for fabricating a wide range of structures and complex geometries. Photosensitive resin-based materials are the most widely used in dental clinics, from manufacturing orthodontic devices to implant surgical guides. Each device for 3D printing carries advantages and disadvantages as well as specific requirements for understanding the printing process. This article contains an introduction of the vat photopolymerization-based dental 3D printing devices to en hance understanding, thus gaining feasibility of the clinical use.

keywords
3d, printing, vat polymerization, stereolithography

참고문헌

1.

1. ISO/ASTM (2017) ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology. https://www.iso.org/standard/69669.html.

2.

2. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chemical reviews. 2017 Aug 9;117(15):10212-90.

3.

3. Al-Dulaijan YA, Alsulaimi L, Alotaibi R, Alboainain A, Akhtar S, Khan SQ, Al-Ghamdi M, Gad MM. Effect of Printing Orientation and Postcuring Time on the Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Resins. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2022 Aug 16.

4.

4. Piedra-Cascón W, Krishnamurthy VR, Att W, Revilla-León M. 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and postprocessing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative review. Journal of Dentistry. 2021 Jun 1;109:103630.

5.

5. Lee EH, Ahn JS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on the color stability and stainability of a 3D-printed resin material. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022 Feb 25.

6.

6. Puebla K, Arcaute K, Quintana R, Wicker RB. Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2012 Jul 27;18(5):374-88.

7.

7. Aati S, Akram Z, Shrestha B, Patel J, Shih B, Shearston K, Ngo H, Fawzy A. Effect of post-curing light exposure time on the physico–mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of 3D-printed denture base material. Dental Materials. 2022 Jan 1;38(1):57-67.

8.

8. Chang J, Choi Y, Moon W, Chung SH. Impact of postpolymerization devices and locations on the color, translucency, and mechanical properties of 3D-printed interim resin materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022 Sep 28.

9.

9. Moon W, Kim S, Lim BS, Park YS, Kim RJ, Chung SH. Dimensional accuracy evaluation of temporary dental restorations with different 3D printing systems. Materials. 2021 Mar 18;14(6):1487.

10.

10. Groth CH, Kravitz ND, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Three-dimensional printing technology. J Clin Orthod. 2014Aug 1;48(8):475-85.

11.

11. SAHA, Sourabh K., et al. Scalable submicrometer additive manufacturing. Science, 2019, 366.6461: 105-109.

12.

12. Methani MM, Revilla-León M, Zandinejad A. The potential of additive manufacturing technologies and their processing parameters for the fabrication of all-ceramic crowns: A review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2020Mar;32(2):182-92.

13.

13. He R, Liu W, Wu Z, An D, Huang M, Wu H, Jiang Q, Ji X, Wu S, Xie Z. Fabrication of complex-shaped zirconia ceramic parts via a DLP-stereolithography-based 3D printing method. Ceramics International. 2018 Feb 15;44(3):3412-6.

14.

14. Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M, Zhang B, Ge Q, Magdassi S. Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Advanced Materials. 2017Apr;29(15):1606000.

15.

15. Tsolakis IA, Papaioannou W, Papadopoulou E, Dalampira M, Tsolakis AI. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Dentistry Journal. 2022 Sep 28;10(10):181.

16.

16. Madžarević M, Ibrić S. Evaluation of exposure time and visible light irradiation in LCD 3D printing of ibuprofen extended release tablets. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 Mar 1;158:105688.

17.

17. Santoliquido, O., Colombo, P., & Ortona, A. (2019). Additive Manufacturing of ceramic components by Digital Light Processing:A comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 39(6), 2140-2148.

18.

18. Kessler A, Hickel R, Reymus M. 3D printing in dentistry—State of the art. Operative dentistry. 2020;45(1):30-40.

logo

논문 투고
OA 정책