바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

dentification of damage states and damge indices of single box tunnel from inelastic seismic analysis

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2016, v.18 no.2, pp.119-128
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2016.18.2.119




Abstract

In a performance-based design, the structural safety is estimated from pre-defined damage states and corresponding damage indices. Both damage states and damage indices are well defined for above-ground structures, but very limited studies have been performed on underground structures. In this study, we define the damage states and damage indices of a cut-and-cover box tunnel which is one of typical structures used in metro systems, under a seismic excitation from a series of inelastic frame analyses. Three damage states are defined in terms of the number of plastic hinges that develop within the structure. The damage index is defined as the ratio of the elastic moment to the yield moment. Through use of the proposed index, the inelastic behavior and failure mechanism of box tunnels can be simulated and predicted through elastic analysis. In addition, the damage indices are linked to free-field shear strains. Because the free-field shear strain can be easily calculated from a 1D site response analysis, the proposed method can be readily used in practice. Further studies are needed to determine the range of shear strains and associated uncertainties for various types of tunnels and site profiles. However, the inter-linked platform of damage state – damage index – shear wave velocity – shear strain provides a novel approach for estimating the inelastic response of tunnels, and can be widely used in practice for seismic designs.

keywords
Inelastic analysis, Cut-and-cover box tunnel, Plastic hinge, Damage state, Damage index, 비탄성 해석, 개착식 터널, 소성 힌지, 손상 상태, 손상 지수

Reference

1.

1. Andreotti, G., Lai, C.G., Martinelli, M. (2013), “Seismic fragility functions of deep tunnels: a new cumulative damage model based on lumped plasticity and rotation capacity”, ICEGE Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 1-5.

2.

2. Argyroudis, S.A., Pitilakis, K.D. (2012), “Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 1-12.

3.

3. Bobet, A. (2003), “Effect of pore water pressure on tunnel support during static and seismic loading”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 377-393.

4.

4. Chang, J.H., Park, D., Kim, D.K. (2014), “Seismic analysis of shallow cut and cover tunnel via frame analysis”, Submitted to Journal of the Korean geotechnical Society.

5.

5. Dowding, C.H., Rozan, A. (1978), “Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 175-191.

6.

6. Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., John, I., Yao, C. (2001), “Seismic design and analysis of underground structures”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 247-293.

7.

7. Hashash, Y.M.A., Karina, K., Koutsoftas, D., O'Riordan, N. (2010), “Seismic design considerations for underground box structures”, Earth Retention Conference, 3, pp. 1-4.

8.

8. Hashash, Y.M.A., Park, D., Yao, J.I.C. (2005), “Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 435-441.

9.

9. Huo, H., Bobet, A., Fernández, G., Ramírez, J. (2006), “Analytical solution for deep rectangular structures subjected to far-field shear stresses”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 613-625.

10.

10. Iai, S. (2005), “International Standard (ISO) on seismic actions for designing geotechnical works–an overview”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 605-615.

11.

11. Liu, J., Liu, X. (2008), “Pushover analysis of Daikai subway station during the Osaka-Kobe earthquake in 1995”, The 14th world Conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, pp. 12-17.

12.

12. MLTM (2009), “Earthquake resistance design regulations for subway structures”: Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affais.

13.

13. Nakamura, S., Yoshida, N., Iwatate, T. (1996), “Damage to daikai subway station during the 1995Hyogoken-Namvu earthquake and its investigation”:JSCE, Committee of Earthquake Engineering, pp. 287-295.

14.

14. Owen, G.N., Scholl, R.E. (1981), Earthquake engineering of large underground structures : final report, FHWA/RD-80/195,The Division ; National Technical Information Service, Washington, D.C., pp.xvi, 279.

15.

15. Park, D., Sagong, M., Kwak, D.Y., Jeong, C.G. (2009), “Simulation of tunnel response under spatially varying ground motion”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 11-12, pp. 1417-1424.

16.

16. Penzien, J. (2000), “Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings”, International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 29, pp. 683-691.

17.

17. Sharma, S., Judd, W.R. (1991), “Underground opening damage from earthquakes”, Engineering Geology, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 263-276.

18.

18. Wang, J.M. (1985), “The distribution of earthquake damage to underground facilities during the 1976Tangshan Earthquake”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 741-757.

19.

19. Wang, J.N. (1993), “Seismic design of tunnels: a simple state-of-the-art approach”, Monograph 7. New York: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.

20.

20. Wang, W.L., Wang, T.T., Su, J.J., Lin, C.H., Seng, C.R., Huang, T.H. (2001), “Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 133-150.

21.

21. Wang, Z.Z., Zhang, Z. (2013), “Seismic damage classification and risk assessment of mountain tunnels with a validation for the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 45, pp. 45-55.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회