바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

ISSN : 2233-8292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.19 No.3

Citation Share

Development of evaluation model for optimum design of multi-utility tunnel in urban area

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2017, v.19 no.3, pp.437-447
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2017.19.3.437




& (2017). Development of evaluation model for optimum design of multi-utility tunnel in urban area. (사)한국터널지하공간학회, 19(3), 437-447, https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2017.19.3.437

Abstract

In current, there has not been the evaluation model for the optimum design of the multi-utility tunnel by considering urban type and size, the function of surrounding road and feasibility analyses with respect to construction method, and arrangement of accommodation facilities inside multi-utility tunnel. Thus, in this study, we developed the evaluation model for the optimum design of the multi-utility tunnel before and after the decision of the multi-utility tunnel installation. In this paper, we have selected the Deming cycle which is used in various fields among several decision methods for optimizing the design. For the purpose of reflecting the various factors in the design of the multi-utility tunnel, 11 higher indicators were set up to lead to more detailed approaches. In addition, based on the “Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA)” circulation method, we can realize the installation of the multi-utility tunnel and design more efficiently through the first phase for conception and the second phase for optimization, and develop the program for the evaluation model accordingly.

keywords
공동구, 설계용량최적화, 평가모델, 데밍사이클, PDCA, Multi-utility tunnel, Optimum design, Evaluation model, Deming cycle, PDCA

Reference

1.

1. Deming, W.E. (1950), “Elementary principles of the statistical control of quality”, JUSE.

2.

2. Kang, Y.K., Choi, I.C. (2015), “Economic Feasibility of Common Utility Tunnel based on Cost-Benefit Analysis”, Journal of Korean Society of Safety. Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 29-36.

3.

3. Lee, S.W., Sim, Y.J., Na, G.T. (2017), “A fundamental study on the development of feasibility assessment system for utility tunnel by urban patterns”, J. of Korean Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Assoc., Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 11-27.

4.

4. Oh, T.M., Park, E.S., Cheon, D.S., Cho, G.C., Joo, G.W. (2015), “A review of the effects of rock properties on waterjet rock cutting performance”, J. of Korean Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Assoc., Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 533-551.

5.

5. Park, J.D., Ahn, C.K., Kim, D.Y, Lee, S.W. (2016), “Experimental study on the behavior of retaining wall according to underground excavation distance”, J. of Korean Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Assoc., Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 155-164.

6.

6. Park, J.O., Yoo, Y.H., Park, B.J. (2015), “An analysis for reasonable installation of tunnel fire safety facility”, J. of Korean Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Assoc., Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 243-248.

7.

7. Seoul Development Institute (2009), “Urban form study of Seoul”.

8.

8. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2014), “A report of the feasibility and basic planning establishment for urban utility tunnel in Seoul”.

9.

9. Sim, Y.J., Jin, K.N., Choi, D.C., NA, G.T., Cho, Y.C. (2016), “Development of optimal design capacity assessment algorithm for urban multi-utility tunnel construction”, 2016 Annual Spring Conference of Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association, pp. 127-128.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

e-Submission OA Policy