바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2233-8292

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.3
Citation Share

쉴드 TBM 굴진 주요 영향인자분석 및 굴진율 예측모델 제시

Study on the effective parameters and a prediction model of the shield TBM performance

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2019, v.21 no.3, pp.347-362
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.3.347
조선아 (한국전력연구원 차세대송변전연구소 연구원)
김경열 (한국전력공사 전력연구원)
류희환 (한국전력공사)
조계춘 (한국과학기술원)
조선아, 김경열, 류희환, & 조계춘. (2019). 쉴드 TBM 굴진 주요 영향인자분석 및 굴진율 예측모델 제시. (사)한국터널지하공간학회, 21(3), 347-362, https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.3.347
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

도심지 터널 공사가 많아지면서 이에 따른 소음, 진동, 교통불편 및 민원 저감을 위해 TBM 굴착이 증가하고 있다. 그러나 이러한 추세에도 불구하고 국내 TBM 공동구 설계 및 시공을 위한 기준들은 대부분 해외기술(일본, 독일 등)을 이용하고 있어 국내환경을 고려하지 못하고 있다. 특히, 공동구 TBM 설계의 주요 기준이 되는 굴진율은 대부분 일축압축강도만으로 산정되며 이마저도 실제 현장 특성과 맞지 않아 개선이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 국내 현장에 적합한 굴진율을예측하기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위해 시공 중인 소단면 쉴드 TBM 굴착 현장의 지반 및 굴진데이터를 수집하고 상관관계 분석을 통해 굴진율에 영향을 미치는 주요인자를 파악하였다. 도출된 영향인자들은 통계적 분석기법을 기반으로 한다중선형 회귀분석에 적용되어 굴진율을 예측하는 회귀식의 예측변수로 이용되었다. 결과적으로 회귀분석을 통해 도출된 회귀식은 일축압축강도와 절리간격을 예측변수로 추정되었으며, 해외 경험식과 비교하여 국내현장 굴진율의 예측 정확도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 다만, 이 회귀식을 타 국내 현장에 적용할 경우 예측오차가 다소 증가하였다. 회귀식이 갖는 이와 같은 적용 한계를 개선하기 위해서는 추가적인 연구를 통해 현장조건에 제약을 받지 않는 굴진율 예측모델 도출이 필요할 것으로 보인다.

keywords
TBM 굴진성능, 굴진율, 일축압축강도, 암반특성, 회귀분석, TBM performance, Penetration rate, Uniaxial compressive strength, Rock mass properties, Regression analysis

Abstract

Underground excavation using TBM machines has been increasing to reduce complaints caused by noise, vibration, and traffic congestion resulted from the urban underground construction in Korea. However, TBM excavation design and construction still need improvement because those are based on standards of the technologically advanced countries (e.g., Japan, Germany) that do not consider geological environment in Korea at all. Above all, although TBM performance is a main factor determining the TBM machine type, duration and cost of the construction, it is estimated by only using UCS (uniaxial compressive strength) as the ground parameters and it often does not match the actual field conditions. This study was carried out as part of efforts to predict penetration rate suitable for Korean ground conditions. The effective parameters were defined through the correlation analysis between the penetration rate and the geotechnical parameters or TBM performance parameters. The effective parameters were then used as variables of the multiple regression analysis to derive a regression model for predicting TBM penetration rate. As a result, the regression model was estimated by UCS and joint spacing and showed a good agreement with field penetration rate measured during TBM excavation. However, when this model was applied to another site in Korea, the prediction accuracy was slightly reduced. Therefore, in order to overcome the limitation of the regression model, further studies are required to obtain a generalized prediction model which is not restricted by the field conditions.

keywords
TBM 굴진성능, 굴진율, 일축압축강도, 암반특성, 회귀분석, TBM performance, Penetration rate, Uniaxial compressive strength, Rock mass properties, Regression analysis

참고문헌

1.

1. Armetti, G., Migliazza, M.R., Ferrari, F, Berti, A., Padovese, P. (2018), “Geological and mechanical rock mass conditions for TBM performance prediction. The case of “La Maddalena” exploratory tunnel, Chiomonte (Italy)”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 77, pp. 115-126.

2.

2. Barton, N. (1999), “TBM performance estimation in rock using QTBM”, Tunnels and Tunnelling International, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 30-34.

3.

3. Benato, A., Oreste, P. (2015), “Prediction of penetration per revolution in TBM tunneling as a function of intact rock and rock mass characteristics”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 74, pp. 119-127.

4.

4. Von Preinl, Z.T., Tamames, B.C., Fernandez, J.M., Hernandez, M.A. (2006), “Rock mass excavability indicator: New way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 21, pp. 237.

5.

5. Bruland, A. (1998), Hard rock tunnel boring - background and discussion, Doctoral Theses, NTNU, pp.81.

6.

6. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Bae, G.J., Jeon, S. (2007), “A parametric study of rock properties and mechanical cutting conditions for deriving an optimum design model of a TBM cutterhead equipped with disc cutters”, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27, No. 1C, pp. 87-98.

7.

7. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Lee, G.P., Bae, G.J. (2011), “Rock TBM design model derived from the multi-variate regression analysis of TBM driving data”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 531-555.

8.

8. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Park, Y.T., Lee, G.P., Bae G.J. (2012), “Characterization of the deformation of a disc cutter in linear rock cutting test”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 197-213.

9.

9. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Park, Y.T., Lee, G.P., Bae, G.J. (2013), “Experimental evaluation of the effects of cutting ring shape on cutter acting forces in a hard rock”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 225-235.

10.

10. Delisio, A., Zhao, J. (2014), “A new model for TBM performance prediction in blocky rock conditions”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 43, pp. 440-452.

11.

11. Farmer, I.W., Glossop, N.H. (1980), “Mechanics of disc cutter penetration”, Tunnels and Tunnelling, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 22-25.

12.

12. Graham, P.C. (1976), Rock exploration for machine manufacturers, Exploration for Rock Engineering, Balkema, Johannesburg, pp. 173-180.

13.

13. Hamidi, J.K., Shahriar, K., Rezai, B., Rostami, J. (2010), “Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 333-345.

14.

14. Hassanpour, J., Rostami, J., Zhao, J. (2011), “A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 595-603.

15.

15. Hughes, H.M. (1986), “The relative cuttability of coal measures stone”, Mining Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 95-109.

16.

16. Kim, S.H., Park, I.J., Chang, S.H. (2013), “Evaluation of disc cutter penetration depth of shield TBM in practice”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 321-331.

17.

17. Lee, H., Song, K.I., Cho, G.C. (2016), “Analysis on prediction models of TBM performance: A review”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling underground Space Association, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 245-256.

18.

18. Rostami, J., Ozdemir, L. (1993), “A new model for performance prediction of hard rock TBMs”, Proceedings of the 11th Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, Boston, pp. 793-809.

19.

19. Sapigni, M., Berti, M., Bethaz, E., Busillo, A., Cardone, G. (2002), “TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 771-788.

20.

20. Shahriar, K., Ahangari, K., Kamali-Bandpey, H. (2012), “A statistical model for prediction TBM performance using rock mass characteristics in the TBM driven Alborz Tunnel Project”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 23, pp. 5048-5054.

21.

21. Tarkoy, P.J. (1986), Practical geotechnical and engineering properties for tunnel-boring machine performance analysis and prediction, Transportation Research Record 1087, Washington, D.C., pp. 62-78.

22.

22. Yagiz, S. (2008), “Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 326-339.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

논문 투고 OA 정책