바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Journal of Wellbeing Management and Applied Psychology / Journal of Wellbeing Management and Applied Psychology, (E)2586-6036
2024, v.7 no.3, pp.73-95
https://doi.org/10.13106/jwmap.2024.vol7.no3.73
Dong-Myung CHO
Ju-Yeon LEE
Woo-Taeg KWON

Abstract

Purpose: Since August 2000, the small-scale environmental impact assessment system has prevented indiscriminate development. However, its qualitative reports lack objectivity and consistency. This study analyzes these issues through literature and expert surveys and proposes improvements. Research Methodology: Samples were selected based on regional consultation numbers. Mitigation measures were categorized into qualitative and quantitative factors. Issues were identified, and improvements suggested. The Delphi method helped select evaluation items and propose a scoring table. Results and Conclusions: The Delphi method selected 14 absolute and 22 relative evaluation items, excluding 3 invalid ones. A 100-point scoring table was created, with points assigned based on element significance. A 1-point bonus was added for top-scoring elements to promote eco-friendly planning.

keywords
Small-scale environmental impact assessment, Qualitative and Quantitative assessment factor, Delphi Method, Environmental Impact Assessment Information Support System(EIASS)

Journal of Wellbeing Management and Applied Psychology