바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Lee Dong Yeun Consuming Spaces in the Global Era: Distinctions between Consumer Spaces in Seoul

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2004, v.44 no.3, pp.108-137

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The urbanization process of marginalized locals can be observed within the globalization process of capital. Seouls consumer spaces in the global era have diversified in a complicated pattern. When the changing logic of consumer spaces is examined closely, it can be described as a process of decentralization of and distinctions within spaces. The re-centralization and specialization of spaces constitute a factor that deepens the distinction of cultural capital within diversified consumer spaces. How the enormous consumer space of Seoul becomes distinct on the basis of cultural tastes will be reviewed through a detailed analysis of two different consumer spaces, Apgujeong-dong and Dongdaemun.A comparison of Apgujeong-dong with Dongdaemun as consumer spaces has three cultural implications. First, Apgujeong-dong and Dongdaemun are defined here not as mere individual consumer spaces, but as symbolic spaces possessing different living standards and lifestyles. Second, the comparison deals with the economic base of customers of these consumer spaces, along with their related lifestyles and cultural tastes. Distinctions within consumer spaces expose disparities between consumption standards by class. Third, a spatial analysis is needed to understand what regional significance Apgujeong-dong and Dongdaemun hold in this age of global consumerism.

keywords
globalization, urban space, consumer spaces, distinction, cultural taste and lifestyle, spatial practice Urban Space in the Global Era: A Review of TheoryOf the various definitions (interpretations?) of globalization, hybridization is the concept th, globalization, urban space, consumer spaces, distinction, cultural taste and lifestyle, spatial practice Urban Space in the Global Era: A Review of TheoryOf the various definitions (interpretations?) of globalization, hybridization is the concept th

Reference

1.

Appadurai, Arjun, (1996) Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Culture Economy(In Modernity at Large), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

2.

Mulder,Arjen , (2002) The Right to Participate in the Work of the Imagination (In Transurbanism), Rotterdam: V2_Publishing/NAI Publishers

3.

Ashcroft, Bill, (2000) Globalizations(In Postcolonial Studies: The Key Concepts), London and New York: Routledge

4.

Bakhtin, Mikhail, (1984) Rabelais and His World. Translated by Helene Iswolsky, Bloomington: Indiana University Press

5.

Bourdieu, Pierre, (1994) Hondon-eul ireukineun gwahak=A Science that Makes Trouble/Sociology in Question, Seoul: Sol

6.

Jong-cheol,Choe , (1995) Gubyeol jitgi (sang): munhwa-wa chwihyang-ui sahoehak=Distinctions I: a Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Seoul: Saemulgyeol

7.

Certeau, Michel de, (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkley: University of California Press.

8.

Davis, Mike, (1992) Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space(In Variations on a Theme Park, edited by Michael Sorkin), New York: The Noonday Press

9.

Dirlik, Arif, (1997) The Global in the Local(In The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism), Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press

10.

Do, Jeong-il, (1992) Apgujeong-dong: yutopia, diseutopia=Apgujeong-dong: Utopia or Dystopia(In Apgujeong-dong: yutopia, diseutopia=Apgujeong-dong: Utopia or Dystopia13-31), Seoul: Hyeonsil Munhwa Yeongu

11.

Featherstone, Mike, (1996) Localism, Globalism, and Cultural Identity(In Global/Local: Cultural Production and Transnational Imaginary), Durham and London: Duke University Press.

12.

Fiske, John, (1992) Cultural Studies and the Culture of Everyday Life(In Cultural Studies), New York and London: Routledge.

13.

Giddens, Anthony, (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press

14.

Harvey, David, (1989) Urban Experiences, Oxford: Basil Blackwell

15.

Jo, Hye-jeong, (1992) Apgujeong ‘gonggan’-eul baraboneun siseondeul: munhwa jeongchijeok silcheon-eul wihayeo=Eyes Looking at Apgujeong-dong “Space”: For Culture Political Practices(In Apgujeong-dong: yutopia,diseutopia),

16.

Jo, Myeong-rae, (2004) Sin sangnyucheung-ui bangju-roseoui gangnam=Gangnam as the Ark of New Upper Class, Hwanghae munhwa

17.

Kang, Nae-hui, (1992) Apgujeong-dong-ui munje seoljeong: hanguk jabonjuui-ui yongmang gujo=Problematic Nature of Apgujeong-dong: Desire Structure of Capitalism(In Apgujeong-dong: yutopia, diseutopia),

18.

(2004) Gangnam-ui gyegeup-gwa munhwa=Classes and Culture of Gangnam, Hwanghae munhwa =Hwanghae Culture

19.

Kim, Hyeong-guk, (2004) Gangnam-ui tansaeng=The Birth of Gangnam, Hwanghae munhwa

20.

Mulder, Arje, (2002) Transurbanism(In Transurbanism), Rotterdam: V2_Publishing/NAI Publishers

21.

Pieterse, Jan Nederveen, (1996) Globalization as Hybridization(In Global Modernities), London: Sage

22.

Robertson, Roland, (1992) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: Sage

23.

(1995) Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity(In Global Modernities),

24.

Shields, Rob. , (1997) Ethnography in the Crowd: The Body, Sociality, and Globalization in Seoul, Focaal, Tijdschrift voor Antropologie

25.

Soja, Edward, (2000) Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions, Oxford: Basil Blackwell

26.

Thomlinson, John, (1994) Munhwa jegukjuui=Cultural Imperialism, Seoul: Nanam

27.

Wallerstein, Immanuel, Historical Capitalism/Capital Civilization,

Korea Journal