바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.54 No.1

Citation Share

Who Are Venerated in Contemporary Domestic Ancestral Rites? An Aspect of Ritual Change among Urbanites in Korea

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2014, v.54 no.1, pp.85-104
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2014.54.1.85

(2014). Who Are Venerated in Contemporary Domestic Ancestral Rites? An Aspect of Ritual Change among Urbanites in Korea. Korea Journal, 54(1), 85-104, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2014.54.1.85

Abstract

Ancestral rites have a long tradition in Korea. The norms applied to traditional “Confucian-style” ancestral rites were likely adopted in the eighteenth century when Neo-Confucianism was firmly established as the state ideology of the Joseon dynasty. According to these norms, ancestors up to four generations removed are venerated at the home of the primogeniture descendants on their death days and on holidays. However, since the start of industrialization in the 1960s and the ensuing urbanization, ancestral rites have undergone a variety of changes. In the 1970s and 1980s, changes occurred in the ritual procedures, food offerings, and the time of day that the domestic rites begin. In the 1990s, another major change occurred when the range of ancestors covered by the domestic rites shrank. Most urbanites now venerate ancestors no more than two generations removed at domestic rites, especially on death-day rites, instead of the four generations removed prescribed by the traditional norms. This study presents several patterns in current domestic rites, and provides reasons for such a change, including urban lifestyles, the rise of female employment, changing inheritance patterns, and the waning importance of yangban status.

keywords
ancestral rites, domestic rites, Korean tradition, Confucian norms, range of ancestors, ritual change, effects of urbanization

Reference

1.

Academy of Korean Studies, ed. 2001. Dongasia munhwa jeontong-gwa hanguk sahoe (East Asian Cultural Tradition and Korean Society). Seoul: Baeksan Seodang.

2.

Asakura, Toshio. 1998. “Aspects of Yangbanization.” In The Anthropology of Korea:East Asian Perspectives, edited by Mutsuhiko Shima and Roger L. Janelli, 191-211. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.

3.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford:Stanford University.

4.

Harrell, Stevan. 1982. Ploughshare Village: Culture and Context in Taiwan. Seattle:University of Washington Press.

5.

Ikels, Charlotte, ed. 2004. Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

6.

Janelli, Roger L., and Dawnhee Yim Janelli. 1982. Ancestor Worship and Korean Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

7.

Kim, Song-Chul. 1997. “Jongjok-gwa sahoe: hanguk-gwa jungguk-ui bigyo” (Lineage and Society: A Comparison between Korea and China). Bigyo munhwa yeongu (Cross-Cultural Studies) 3: 109-129.

8.

Kim, Song-Chul. 2001. “Hanguk gieop-eseoui gajokjuui-ui pyochul” (The Presence of Familism in Korean Corporations). In Dongasia munhwa jeontong-gwa hanguk sahoe (East Asian Cultural Tradition and Korean Society), edited by the Academy of Korean Studies, 236-258. Seoul: Baeksan Seodang.

9.

Lee, Kwang-Kyu. 1975. Hanguk gajok-ui gujo bunseok (Structural Analysis of Korean Family). Seoul: Iljisa.

10.

Lee, Kwang-Kyu. 1977a. “Chinjok chegye-wa chinjok jojik” (Lineage System and Lineage Organization). Hanguk munhwa illyuhak (Korean Cultural Anthropology) 9: 119-122.

11.

Lee, Kwang-Kyu. 1977b. “Chinjok jipdan-gwa josang sungbae” (Descent Groups and Ancestor Worship). Hanguk munhwa illyuhak (Korean Cultural Anthropology) 9: 1-24.

12.

Lee, Kwang-Kyu. 1987. “Ancestor Worship and Kinship Structure in Korea.” In Religion and Ritual in Korean Society, edited by Laurel Kendall and Griffin Dix, 56-70. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California.

13.

Lee, Kwang-Kyu. 1989. “The Practice of Traditional Family Rituals in Contemporary Urban Korea.” Journal of Ritual Studies 3.2: 167-183.

14.

Sorensen, Clark, and Song-Chul Kim. 2004. “Filial Piety in Contemporary Urban Southeast Korea: Practices and Discourses.” In Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia, edited by Charlotte Ikels, 153-181. Stanford:Stanford University Press.

15.

Statistics Korea. 2009. 2008 Gyeongje hwaldong ingu yeonbo (Annual Report on the Economically Active Population Survey, 2008). Seoul: Statistics Korea.

Korea Journal

e-Submission OA Policy