바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

디지털 환경에서 학술지 인용의 분산화 현상에 관한 연구

The Dispersion Phenomenon of Journal Citations in a Digital Environment

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.2, pp.211-222
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.2.211
신은자 (세종대학교)

Abstract

Electronic publishing has influenced, and in some ways changed, information seeking, reading patterns and citation behaviours. This study collected the Cited Half-Lives, the indicator implies the life-span of scholarly journals, from JCR Social Science edition the before and after of the prevalence of electronic journals, and observed if there are some changes in these two periods. The analysis results of eight disciplines show that the average Cited Half-Lives increased in 2007 than in 1994 for seven disciplines except the demography. Especially in the four disciplines of economics, education, finance and sociology, the average Cited Half-Lives increased significantly. This results show that the concentration, researchers cite more recent articles and concentrate their citations on fewer ones, is lightening and the dispersion of citations is actually increasing. With the online availability of articles and journals the old online materials can be often accessed, used and cited more frequently, the more growth potential of Cited Half-Lives are made in a digital environment. Further research needs to investigate if the phenomenon will become more obvious in various disciplines after a few years.

keywords
인용반감기, 분산화현상, 학술지, 이용, 인용, 수명, Cited Half-Life, dispersion phenomenon, journal, usage, citation, life span, Cited Half-Life, dispersion phenomenon, journal, usage, citation, life span

참고문헌

1.

Eldredge, J.D. (1998). The vital few meet the trivial many: unexpected use patterns in a monographs collection. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(4), 496-503.

2.

Fleming, T.P. (1964). Moderately and heavily used biomedical journals. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 52(1), 234-241.

3.

Garfield, E. (2009). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93.

4.

Guthrie, K.M. (2000). Revitalizing older published literature: preliminary lessons from the use of JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/news/prelimLessons.jsp.

5.

Herman, E. (2004a). Research in progress: some preliminary and key insights into the information needs of the contemporary academic researcher. Part 1. Aslib Proceedings, 56(1), 34-47.

6.

Herman, E. (2004b). Research in progress: some preliminary and key insights into the information needs of the contemporary academic researcher. Part 2. Aslib Proceedings, 56(2), 118-131.

7.

Huntington, P. (2006). Article decay in the digital environment: An analysis of Usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1840-1851.

8.

King, D.W. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.

9.

Laarhoven, P.V. (2005). Usage statistics of online journals: background, trends, and prospects with a local elaboration (-). LIBER 34th annual Conference 2005. University Library of Groningen, the Netherlands.

10.

Lariviere, V. (2007). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858-862.

11.

Nicholas D. (2005). Revisiting 'obsolescence' and journal article 'decay' through usage data: an analysis of digital journal use by year of publication. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1441-1461.

12.

Odlyzko, A. (2002). The Rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing, 15(1), 7-19.

13.

Starr, S. (2008). The long tail: a usage analysis of pre-1993 print biomedical journal literature. Journal of Medical Library Association, 96(1), 20-27.

14.

Tenopir, C. (2000). The Use and value of scholarly journals (60-62). Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting.

15.

Tenopir, C. (2005). Relying on electronic journals: reading patterns of astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 786-802.

16.

Tenopir, C. (2009). Aslib Proceedings. 61(1), 5-31.

17.

Tsay, M.Y. (1998). Library journal use and citation half-life in medical science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1283-1292.

정보관리학회지