- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
기관단위 연구성과 평가방법에 관한 연구: h-지수 및 변형지수를 중심으로
A Study on the Evaluation Methods of Research Institution: Based on the h-index and its Variants
김정은 (대외경제정책연구원)
민윤경 (포스코경영연구소)
초록
h-지수는 개인의 연구성과를 측정하는 지표로 지수의 강건성과 계산의 용이성 등이 인정되면서 이를 보완하는 다양한 변형지수들이 연구되었으며, 이 지수들을 이용하여 연구자 개인의 영향력 평가는 물론, 저널, 학과, 대학, 연구소 등 기관단위 평가를 하려는 시도가 이루어지고 있다. h-지수를 이용한 기관단위의 평가 방법으로는 기관 h-지수, 평균 h-지수, 메타 h-지수 등 세 가지가 있으며, 본 연구에서는 국내 10개 경영대학을 대상으로 h-지수 및 변형지수들의 특징 및 상관관계를 살펴 본 후, 위의 세 가지 방법을 모두 적용하여 각 방법론을 비교 분석하였다.
- keywords
- h-index, mean h-index, meta h-index, research output, institutional evaluation, 기관평가, h-지수, h 변형지수, 연구성과, 평균 h-지수, 메타 h-지수
Abstract
The h-index is a new tool for measuring research outputs based on citation and many variants of h-index have been proposed to improve the weaknesses of h-index. The h-index and its variants can be applied to institutional evaluation in three different ways. We worked out 447 practical cases of professors from 10 business schools and examined h-index and its variants. And then we compared three evaluation methods of research institution based on the h-index and its variants.
- keywords
- h-index, mean h-index, meta h-index, research output, institutional evaluation, 기관평가, h-지수, h 변형지수, 연구성과, 평균 h-지수, 메타 h-지수
참고문헌
이재윤. (2006). 연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(3), 167-186.
Arencibia-Jorge, R.. (2008). Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 155-157.
Arencibia-Jorge, R.. (2009). Influence of individual researcher's visibility on institutional impact: an example of Prathap's approach to successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 79(3), 507-516.
Batista, P.D.. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across discipline. Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.
Bornmann, L.. (2007). What do we know about the h index?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385.
Bornmann, L.. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A Comparison of nine variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830-837.
Bornmann, L.. (2009). Do we need the h-index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1286-1289.
Braun, T.. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.
Cronin, B.. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientist. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278.
Egghe, L.. (2006). An improvement of the h-index: the g-index. IISI Newsletter, 2(1), 8-9.
Grant, J.. (2007). Academic Institutions in the US and Canada ranked according to research productivity in the field of Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology, 21, 1139-1144.
Hirsch, J. E.. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (16569-16572). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
Jin, B.. (2006). h-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8-9.
Quoted in Rousseau, R.. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. http://eprints.rclis.org/6376.
Jin, B.. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855-863.
Kosmulski, M.. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(3), 4-6.
Lazaridis, T.. (2010). Ranking university departments using the mean h-index. Scientometrics, 82(2), 211-216.
Lehmann. S., A. D. Jackson, and B. Lautrup. (2006). Measures and mismeasures of scientific quality. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512238.
Luz, M.. (2008). Institutional h-index: The performance of a new metric in the evaluation of Brazilian Psychiatric Postgraduation Programs. Scientometrics, 77(2), 361-368.
Molinari, A.. (2008). Mathematical aspects of new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics, 75(2), 339-356.
Oppenheim, C.. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British Researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 297-301.
Prathap, G.. (2006). Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions' scientific research output. Current Science, 91(11), 1439-.
Ravichandra Rao, I.K.. (2007). Distributions of Hirsch-index and G-index: An empirical study (655-658). Proceedings of the 11th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. Spanish Research Council.
Quoted in Bornmann, L.. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A Comparison of nine variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830-837.
Ruane, F.. (2008). Rational(succes sive) h-indices: an application to economics in the republic of Ireland. Scientometrics, 75(2), 395-405.
Schubert, A.. (2007). Successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 70(1), 201-205.
Schreiber, M.. (2008). An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1513-1522.
Schreiber, M.. (2010). Revisiting the g-index: the average number of citations in the g-Core. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 169-174.
Tol, Richard S. J.. (2009). The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics, 80(2), 317-324.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수